切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 732 -739. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.06.016

论著

布拉酵母菌散联合蒙脱石散对轮状病毒性肠炎患儿的疗效、免疫功能及肠道微生态影响
陈彩华1,1, 钟丽花1,,1(), 朱道谋2,2   
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-13 修回日期:2021-11-09 出版日期:2021-12-01
  • 通信作者: 钟丽花

Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii sachets combined with montmorillonite powder in children with rotavirus enteritis and its influence on immune function and intestinal microecology

Caihua Chen1,1, Lihua Zhong1,1,(), Daomou Zhu2,2   

  • Received:2021-01-13 Revised:2021-11-09 Published:2021-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Lihua Zhong
  • Supported by:
    Health and Family Planning Industry Research Project of Hainan Province(15A200096)
引用本文:

陈彩华, 钟丽花, 朱道谋. 布拉酵母菌散联合蒙脱石散对轮状病毒性肠炎患儿的疗效、免疫功能及肠道微生态影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(06): 732-739.

Caihua Chen, Lihua Zhong, Daomou Zhu. Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii sachets combined with montmorillonite powder in children with rotavirus enteritis and its influence on immune function and intestinal microecology[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2021, 17(06): 732-739.

目的

探讨布拉酵母菌散联合蒙脱石散治疗轮状病毒性肠炎(RVE)患儿的临床疗效,以及对患儿免疫功能与肠道微生态影响。

方法

选择2018年5月至2020年5月,于海南省妇女儿童医学中心就诊的126例RVE患儿为研究对象。采用随机数字表法,将其随机分为研究组(n=63,采取布拉酵母菌散+蒙脱石散治疗)与对照组(n=63,采取双歧杆菌+蒙脱石散治疗)。采用χ2检验,进行2组患儿临床疗效及不良反应率比较。采用成组t检验与配对t检验,对2组患儿临床症状持续时间、住院时间,治疗前、后血清肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α、白细胞介素(IL)-8,免疫功能指标CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+水平,以及肠道菌群数量等进行比较。2组患儿性别构成比、年龄、体重、轻与中度脱水发生率等临床资料,治疗前2组患儿血清TNF-α、IL-8及CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+水平,以及拟杆菌、大肠埃希菌、肠球菌、乳酸杆菌与双歧杆菌数量比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究经过海南省妇女儿童医学中心伦理委员会批准(审批文号:Z20180111),与患儿监护人均签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①研究组患儿的治疗总有效率为96.8%(61/63),显著高于对照组的87.3%(55/63),并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.910、P=0.048)。②研究组患儿腹泻、呕吐、腹痛持续时间及住院时间分别为(32.4±5.5) h、(23.4±4.4) h、(25.6±3.9) h、(46.3±6.7) h,均显著短于对照组的(54.4±7.3) h、(46.8±6.6) h、(49.9±5.9) h、(66.3±7.5) h,并且差异均有统计学意义(t=7.498、16.427、11.944、8.420, P<0.001)。③治疗后,2组患儿血清TNF-α、IL-8水平组内比较,均较治疗前显著降低;研究组亦均较对照组显著降低,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。④治疗后,2组患儿CD4+、CD4+/CD8+水平组内比较均显著增高,而CD8+水平组内比较,则显著降低;治疗后,研究组CD4+、CD4+/CD8+水平,亦较对照组显著增高,而CD8+水平则较对照组显著降低,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。⑤治疗后,2组患儿拟杆菌、乳酸杆菌及双歧杆菌数量组内比较,均较治疗前显著增高;研究组亦均较对照组显著增高;2组患儿肠球菌、大肠埃希菌数量,均较治疗前显著下降,研究组亦均较对照组显著下降,并且上述差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。⑥治疗中,2组患儿治疗相关不良反应率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

布拉酵母菌散联合蒙脱石散治疗RVE患儿的临床疗效良好,可降低患儿炎症反应、改善机体免疫功能、调节肠道菌群,并且安全性较高。

Objective

To explore clinical effect of Saccharomyces boulardii sachets combined with montmorillonite powder in treatment of children with rotavirus enteritis (RVE) and its influence on immune function and intestinal microecology.

Methods

From May 2018 to May 2020, a total of 126 cases of RVE children were selected as research subjects. They were randomly divided into study group (n=63) and control group (n=63) according to random digital table method. Children in study group were treated with Saccharomyces boulardii sachets and montmorillonite powder, and children in control group were treated with Bifidobacterium and montmorillonite powder. The clinical effect and incidence of adverse reactions between two groups were compared by chi-square test. Duration of clinical symptoms, length of hospital stay, and levels of inflammatory factors [tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-8], immune function indexes (CD4+ , CD8+ and CD4+ /CD8+ ), and amount of intestinal flora before and after treatment were compared between two groups by independent-samples t test and paired-samples t test. There were no statistically significant differences between two groups of children in clinical data, such as gender composition, age, weight, and incidence of mild and moderate dehydration, and serum levels of TNF-α and IL-8, levels of CD4+ , CD8+ , CD4+ /CD8+ , and amount of Bacteroides, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium between two groups before treatment (P>0.05). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hainan Women and Children Medical Center (approval No. Z20180111), and informed consent was signed with the guardians of children.

Results

①Total effective rate of study group was 96.8% (61/63), which was statistically higher than 87.3% (55/63) of control group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=3.910, P=0.048). ②Duration of diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain and length of hospital stay in study group were (32.4±5.5) h, (23.4±4.4) h, (25.6±3.9) h, and (46.3±6.7) h, respectively, which all were shorter than those in control group (54.4±7.3) h, (46.8±6.6) h, (49.9±5.9) h, (66.3±7.5) h, and all differences were statistically significant (t=7.498, 16.427, 11.944, all P<0.001). ③After treatment, serum TNF-α and IL-8 levels of two groups were significantly lower than those within each group before treatment, serum TNF-α and IL-8 levels in study group after treatment were significantly lower than those of control group after treatment, and all differences were statistically significant (P<0.001). ④After treatment, levels of CD4+ and CD4+ /CD8+ of two groups were significantly higher than those within each group before treatment, while levels of CD8+ were significantly lower than those within each group before treatment, and levels of CD4+ and CD4+ /CD8+ in study group after treatment were significantly higher than those of control group after treatment, while levels of CD8+ were significantly lower than those of control group after treatment, and all differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). ⑤After treatment, amount of Bacteroides, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium of two groups were significantly higher than those within each group before treatment, and amount of the above flora in study group after treatment were significantly higher than those of control group after treatment, while amount of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli of two groups were significantly lower than those within each group before treatment, and amount of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli in study group after treatment were significantly lower than those of control goup after treatment and all differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). ⑥Incidence of adverse reactions during treatment in study group was 4.8% (3/63), and the control group was 6.3% (4/63), there was no statistically significant difference between two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Saccharomyces boulardii sachets combined with montmorillonite powder has a good clinical effect in treatment of children with RVE, which can improve the inflammatory reaction and immune function, regulate intestinal flora of children, and has high safety.

表1 2组RVE患儿临床疗效比较[例数(%)]
表2 2组RVE患儿临床症状持续时间及住院时间比较(h,±s)
表3 2组RVE患儿治疗前、后血清TNF-α、IL-8水平组内与组间比较(±s)
表4 2组RVE患儿治疗前、后CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+水平组内与组间比较(±s)
表5 2组RVE患儿治疗前、后肠道菌群数量组内与组间比较[lg(CFU/g),±s]
[1]
Girish Kumar CP, Giri S, Chawla-Sarkar M, et al. Epidemiology of rotavirus diarrhea among children less than 5 years hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis prior to rotavirus vaccine introduction in India[J]. Vaccine, 2020, 38(51): 8154-8160. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.084.
[2]
中华预防医学会. 儿童轮状病毒胃肠炎免疫预防专家共识(2020版)[J]. 中华流行病学杂志2021, 42(1): 44-57. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20201103-01298.
[3]
Verdu EF, Riddle MS. Chronic gastrointestinal consequences of acute infectious diarrhea: evolving concepts in epidemiology and pathogenesis[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2012, 107(7): 981-989. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2012.65.
[4]
郑欣,黄永生,罗立川,等. 葡萄糖酸锌治疗小儿轮状病毒性腹泻75例疗效观察[J]. 陕西医学杂志2017, 9(5): 647-649. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2017.05.045.
[5]
李传义. 口服补液盐联合蒙脱石散混悬液治疗小儿腹泻的临床疗效观察[J]. 中国处方药2018, 16(3): 67-68. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-945X.2019.03.048.
[6]
宋恩杰. 轮状病毒性肠炎患儿体内免疫功能的变化及临床意义[J]. 中国疗养医学2017, 26(10): 1089-1090. DOI: 10.13517/j.cnki.ccm.2017.10.035.
[7]
Troeger C, Khalil IA, Rao PC, et al. Rotavirus vaccination and the global burden of rotavirus diarrhea among children younger than 5 years[J]. JAMA Pediatr, 2018, 172(10): 958-965. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1960.
[8]
雷菊芳,余丽萍,张娜. 参苓白术颗粒联合布拉氏酵母菌散治疗小儿抗生素相关性腹泻临床研究[J]. 国际中医中药杂志2018, 40(7): 613-615. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4246.2018.07.009.
[9]
中华医学会儿科学分会消化学组,中华医学会儿科学分会感染学组,《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会. 儿童腹泻病诊断治疗原则的专家共识[J]. 中华儿科杂志2009, 47(8): 634-636. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2010.04.005.
[10]
中华医学会儿科学分会消化学组,《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会. 中国儿童急性感染性腹泻病临床实践指南[J]. 中华儿科杂志2016, 54(7): 483-488. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2016.07.002.
[11]
冯娜. 中西医结合治疗小儿病毒性腹泻的疗效观察[J]. 陕西中医2015, 5(10): 1365, 1439. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7369.2015.10.052.
[12]
宋关茹,姚萍. 应用实时荧光定量PCR定量检测溃疡性结肠炎肠道大肠埃希菌、乳酸杆菌及双歧杆菌属的变化[J]. 中国微生态学杂志2012, 24(3): 239-243.
[13]
沈开慧,张孟孝,周金玲,等. 锌剂辅助治疗小儿轮状病毒性肠炎的近期疗效及对短期复发的影响[J]. 解放军医药杂志2018, 30(1): 78-81.
[14]
盛欢,吕伟. 轮状病毒性肠炎患儿肝功能、心肌损伤及免疫功能的变化及临床意义[J]. 哈尔滨医科大学学报2019, 53(1): 87-90.
[15]
余玮,孙攀,彭谦,等. 上海市嘉定区儿童感染性腹泻病原菌检测结果分析[J]. 中国卫生标准管理2019, 10(7): 82-85. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2019.07.035.
[16]
陈磊,高志妹,高艳. 运脾化湿方对轮状病毒性肠炎湿热证患儿的免疫调节作用[J]. 国际免疫学杂志2018, 41(1): 41-45. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4394.2018.01.009.
[17]
李卫军. 布拉氏酵母菌散剂联合蒙脱石散治疗小儿病毒性腹泻的疗效[J]. 实用临床医药杂志2018, 22(19): 85-87, 97. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201819024.
[18]
张楠,朱华栋. 益生菌对不同病因所致腹泻的防治作用研究进展[J]. 中国全科医学2020, 23(3): 362-368. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.251.
[19]
王宽锋,屈晖,钟红平,等. 布拉酵母菌对轮状病毒性胃肠炎患儿临床症状及血清IL-10、CD8+的影响[J]. 贵州医药2019, 43(6): 932-933. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2019.06.034.
[20]
高治华,刘菲. 四联康和布拉酵母菌对轮状病毒性腹泻患儿的治疗效果及对心肌酶的影响[J]. 山西医药杂志2019, 48(1): 77-80. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2019.01.030.
[21]
江晓丽,万盛华. 布拉氏酵母菌治疗小儿轮状病毒肠炎的Meta分析[J]. 中国微生态学杂志2019, 31(7): 781-786. DOI: 10.13381/j.cnki.cjm.201907008.
[22]
穆速,李俊江,刘成远,等. 益生菌及布拉氏酵母菌对炎症相关结直肠癌小鼠模型肠道菌群的作用[J]. 中华实验外科杂志2020, 37(2): 236-238. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9030.2020.02.010.
[23]
令狐恩强,杨云生. 肠易激综合征患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群分析[J]. 中华消化杂志2002, 22(7): 423-425. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn:0254-1432.2002.07.011.
[24]
李艳丽,王阳,王实,等. 布拉氏酵母菌对NEC新生鼠肠组织中NOD1、RIP2和NF-κB表达的影响[J]. 四川医学2019, 40(4): 352-358. DOI: 10.16252/j.cnki.issn1004-0501-2019.04.007.
[25]
董江贺,卢小爽,赵艳芳. 葡萄糖酸锌辅助治疗婴幼儿轮状病毒肠炎的临床研究[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(5): 601-604. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2015.05.010.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 罗晨, 宗开灿, 李世颖, 傅应亚. 微小RNA-199a-3p调控CD4T细胞表达参与肺炎支原体肺炎患儿免疫反应研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 569-574.
[7] 姚咏明. 如何精准评估烧伤脓毒症患者免疫状态[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 552-552.
[8] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[9] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[10] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
[11] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[12] 屈霄, 王靓, 陆萍, 何斌, 孙敏. 外周血炎症因子及肠道菌群特征与活动性溃疡性结肠炎患者病情的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 466-470.
[13] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[14] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[15] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要