切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 732 -739. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.06.016

论著

布拉酵母菌散联合蒙脱石散对轮状病毒性肠炎患儿的疗效、免疫功能及肠道微生态影响
陈彩华1,1, 钟丽花1,,1(), 朱道谋2,2   
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-13 修回日期:2021-11-09 出版日期:2021-12-01
  • 通信作者: 钟丽花

Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii sachets combined with montmorillonite powder in children with rotavirus enteritis and its influence on immune function and intestinal microecology

Caihua Chen1,1, Lihua Zhong1,1,(), Daomou Zhu2,2   

  • Received:2021-01-13 Revised:2021-11-09 Published:2021-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Lihua Zhong
  • Supported by:
    Health and Family Planning Industry Research Project of Hainan Province(15A200096)
引用本文:

陈彩华, 钟丽花, 朱道谋. 布拉酵母菌散联合蒙脱石散对轮状病毒性肠炎患儿的疗效、免疫功能及肠道微生态影响[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(06): 732-739.

Caihua Chen, Lihua Zhong, Daomou Zhu. Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii sachets combined with montmorillonite powder in children with rotavirus enteritis and its influence on immune function and intestinal microecology[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2021, 17(06): 732-739.

目的

探讨布拉酵母菌散联合蒙脱石散治疗轮状病毒性肠炎(RVE)患儿的临床疗效,以及对患儿免疫功能与肠道微生态影响。

方法

选择2018年5月至2020年5月,于海南省妇女儿童医学中心就诊的126例RVE患儿为研究对象。采用随机数字表法,将其随机分为研究组(n=63,采取布拉酵母菌散+蒙脱石散治疗)与对照组(n=63,采取双歧杆菌+蒙脱石散治疗)。采用χ2检验,进行2组患儿临床疗效及不良反应率比较。采用成组t检验与配对t检验,对2组患儿临床症状持续时间、住院时间,治疗前、后血清肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α、白细胞介素(IL)-8,免疫功能指标CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+水平,以及肠道菌群数量等进行比较。2组患儿性别构成比、年龄、体重、轻与中度脱水发生率等临床资料,治疗前2组患儿血清TNF-α、IL-8及CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+水平,以及拟杆菌、大肠埃希菌、肠球菌、乳酸杆菌与双歧杆菌数量比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究经过海南省妇女儿童医学中心伦理委员会批准(审批文号:Z20180111),与患儿监护人均签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①研究组患儿的治疗总有效率为96.8%(61/63),显著高于对照组的87.3%(55/63),并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.910、P=0.048)。②研究组患儿腹泻、呕吐、腹痛持续时间及住院时间分别为(32.4±5.5) h、(23.4±4.4) h、(25.6±3.9) h、(46.3±6.7) h,均显著短于对照组的(54.4±7.3) h、(46.8±6.6) h、(49.9±5.9) h、(66.3±7.5) h,并且差异均有统计学意义(t=7.498、16.427、11.944、8.420, P<0.001)。③治疗后,2组患儿血清TNF-α、IL-8水平组内比较,均较治疗前显著降低;研究组亦均较对照组显著降低,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。④治疗后,2组患儿CD4+、CD4+/CD8+水平组内比较均显著增高,而CD8+水平组内比较,则显著降低;治疗后,研究组CD4+、CD4+/CD8+水平,亦较对照组显著增高,而CD8+水平则较对照组显著降低,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。⑤治疗后,2组患儿拟杆菌、乳酸杆菌及双歧杆菌数量组内比较,均较治疗前显著增高;研究组亦均较对照组显著增高;2组患儿肠球菌、大肠埃希菌数量,均较治疗前显著下降,研究组亦均较对照组显著下降,并且上述差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。⑥治疗中,2组患儿治疗相关不良反应率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

布拉酵母菌散联合蒙脱石散治疗RVE患儿的临床疗效良好,可降低患儿炎症反应、改善机体免疫功能、调节肠道菌群,并且安全性较高。

Objective

To explore clinical effect of Saccharomyces boulardii sachets combined with montmorillonite powder in treatment of children with rotavirus enteritis (RVE) and its influence on immune function and intestinal microecology.

Methods

From May 2018 to May 2020, a total of 126 cases of RVE children were selected as research subjects. They were randomly divided into study group (n=63) and control group (n=63) according to random digital table method. Children in study group were treated with Saccharomyces boulardii sachets and montmorillonite powder, and children in control group were treated with Bifidobacterium and montmorillonite powder. The clinical effect and incidence of adverse reactions between two groups were compared by chi-square test. Duration of clinical symptoms, length of hospital stay, and levels of inflammatory factors [tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-8], immune function indexes (CD4+ , CD8+ and CD4+ /CD8+ ), and amount of intestinal flora before and after treatment were compared between two groups by independent-samples t test and paired-samples t test. There were no statistically significant differences between two groups of children in clinical data, such as gender composition, age, weight, and incidence of mild and moderate dehydration, and serum levels of TNF-α and IL-8, levels of CD4+ , CD8+ , CD4+ /CD8+ , and amount of Bacteroides, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium between two groups before treatment (P>0.05). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hainan Women and Children Medical Center (approval No. Z20180111), and informed consent was signed with the guardians of children.

Results

①Total effective rate of study group was 96.8% (61/63), which was statistically higher than 87.3% (55/63) of control group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=3.910, P=0.048). ②Duration of diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain and length of hospital stay in study group were (32.4±5.5) h, (23.4±4.4) h, (25.6±3.9) h, and (46.3±6.7) h, respectively, which all were shorter than those in control group (54.4±7.3) h, (46.8±6.6) h, (49.9±5.9) h, (66.3±7.5) h, and all differences were statistically significant (t=7.498, 16.427, 11.944, all P<0.001). ③After treatment, serum TNF-α and IL-8 levels of two groups were significantly lower than those within each group before treatment, serum TNF-α and IL-8 levels in study group after treatment were significantly lower than those of control group after treatment, and all differences were statistically significant (P<0.001). ④After treatment, levels of CD4+ and CD4+ /CD8+ of two groups were significantly higher than those within each group before treatment, while levels of CD8+ were significantly lower than those within each group before treatment, and levels of CD4+ and CD4+ /CD8+ in study group after treatment were significantly higher than those of control group after treatment, while levels of CD8+ were significantly lower than those of control group after treatment, and all differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). ⑤After treatment, amount of Bacteroides, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium of two groups were significantly higher than those within each group before treatment, and amount of the above flora in study group after treatment were significantly higher than those of control group after treatment, while amount of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli of two groups were significantly lower than those within each group before treatment, and amount of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli in study group after treatment were significantly lower than those of control goup after treatment and all differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). ⑥Incidence of adverse reactions during treatment in study group was 4.8% (3/63), and the control group was 6.3% (4/63), there was no statistically significant difference between two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Saccharomyces boulardii sachets combined with montmorillonite powder has a good clinical effect in treatment of children with RVE, which can improve the inflammatory reaction and immune function, regulate intestinal flora of children, and has high safety.

表1 2组RVE患儿临床疗效比较[例数(%)]
表2 2组RVE患儿临床症状持续时间及住院时间比较(h,±s)
表3 2组RVE患儿治疗前、后血清TNF-α、IL-8水平组内与组间比较(±s)
表4 2组RVE患儿治疗前、后CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+水平组内与组间比较(±s)
表5 2组RVE患儿治疗前、后肠道菌群数量组内与组间比较[lg(CFU/g),±s]
[1]
Girish Kumar CP, Giri S, Chawla-Sarkar M, et al. Epidemiology of rotavirus diarrhea among children less than 5 years hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis prior to rotavirus vaccine introduction in India[J]. Vaccine, 2020, 38(51): 8154-8160. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.084.
[2]
中华预防医学会. 儿童轮状病毒胃肠炎免疫预防专家共识(2020版)[J]. 中华流行病学杂志2021, 42(1): 44-57. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20201103-01298.
[3]
Verdu EF, Riddle MS. Chronic gastrointestinal consequences of acute infectious diarrhea: evolving concepts in epidemiology and pathogenesis[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2012, 107(7): 981-989. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2012.65.
[4]
郑欣,黄永生,罗立川,等. 葡萄糖酸锌治疗小儿轮状病毒性腹泻75例疗效观察[J]. 陕西医学杂志2017, 9(5): 647-649. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2017.05.045.
[5]
李传义. 口服补液盐联合蒙脱石散混悬液治疗小儿腹泻的临床疗效观察[J]. 中国处方药2018, 16(3): 67-68. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-945X.2019.03.048.
[6]
宋恩杰. 轮状病毒性肠炎患儿体内免疫功能的变化及临床意义[J]. 中国疗养医学2017, 26(10): 1089-1090. DOI: 10.13517/j.cnki.ccm.2017.10.035.
[7]
Troeger C, Khalil IA, Rao PC, et al. Rotavirus vaccination and the global burden of rotavirus diarrhea among children younger than 5 years[J]. JAMA Pediatr, 2018, 172(10): 958-965. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1960.
[8]
雷菊芳,余丽萍,张娜. 参苓白术颗粒联合布拉氏酵母菌散治疗小儿抗生素相关性腹泻临床研究[J]. 国际中医中药杂志2018, 40(7): 613-615. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4246.2018.07.009.
[9]
中华医学会儿科学分会消化学组,中华医学会儿科学分会感染学组,《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会. 儿童腹泻病诊断治疗原则的专家共识[J]. 中华儿科杂志2009, 47(8): 634-636. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2010.04.005.
[10]
中华医学会儿科学分会消化学组,《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会. 中国儿童急性感染性腹泻病临床实践指南[J]. 中华儿科杂志2016, 54(7): 483-488. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2016.07.002.
[11]
冯娜. 中西医结合治疗小儿病毒性腹泻的疗效观察[J]. 陕西中医2015, 5(10): 1365, 1439. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7369.2015.10.052.
[12]
宋关茹,姚萍. 应用实时荧光定量PCR定量检测溃疡性结肠炎肠道大肠埃希菌、乳酸杆菌及双歧杆菌属的变化[J]. 中国微生态学杂志2012, 24(3): 239-243.
[13]
沈开慧,张孟孝,周金玲,等. 锌剂辅助治疗小儿轮状病毒性肠炎的近期疗效及对短期复发的影响[J]. 解放军医药杂志2018, 30(1): 78-81.
[14]
盛欢,吕伟. 轮状病毒性肠炎患儿肝功能、心肌损伤及免疫功能的变化及临床意义[J]. 哈尔滨医科大学学报2019, 53(1): 87-90.
[15]
余玮,孙攀,彭谦,等. 上海市嘉定区儿童感染性腹泻病原菌检测结果分析[J]. 中国卫生标准管理2019, 10(7): 82-85. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2019.07.035.
[16]
陈磊,高志妹,高艳. 运脾化湿方对轮状病毒性肠炎湿热证患儿的免疫调节作用[J]. 国际免疫学杂志2018, 41(1): 41-45. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4394.2018.01.009.
[17]
李卫军. 布拉氏酵母菌散剂联合蒙脱石散治疗小儿病毒性腹泻的疗效[J]. 实用临床医药杂志2018, 22(19): 85-87, 97. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201819024.
[18]
张楠,朱华栋. 益生菌对不同病因所致腹泻的防治作用研究进展[J]. 中国全科医学2020, 23(3): 362-368. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.251.
[19]
王宽锋,屈晖,钟红平,等. 布拉酵母菌对轮状病毒性胃肠炎患儿临床症状及血清IL-10、CD8+的影响[J]. 贵州医药2019, 43(6): 932-933. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2019.06.034.
[20]
高治华,刘菲. 四联康和布拉酵母菌对轮状病毒性腹泻患儿的治疗效果及对心肌酶的影响[J]. 山西医药杂志2019, 48(1): 77-80. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2019.01.030.
[21]
江晓丽,万盛华. 布拉氏酵母菌治疗小儿轮状病毒肠炎的Meta分析[J]. 中国微生态学杂志2019, 31(7): 781-786. DOI: 10.13381/j.cnki.cjm.201907008.
[22]
穆速,李俊江,刘成远,等. 益生菌及布拉氏酵母菌对炎症相关结直肠癌小鼠模型肠道菌群的作用[J]. 中华实验外科杂志2020, 37(2): 236-238. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9030.2020.02.010.
[23]
令狐恩强,杨云生. 肠易激综合征患者外周血T淋巴细胞亚群分析[J]. 中华消化杂志2002, 22(7): 423-425. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn:0254-1432.2002.07.011.
[24]
李艳丽,王阳,王实,等. 布拉氏酵母菌对NEC新生鼠肠组织中NOD1、RIP2和NF-κB表达的影响[J]. 四川医学2019, 40(4): 352-358. DOI: 10.16252/j.cnki.issn1004-0501-2019.04.007.
[25]
董江贺,卢小爽,赵艳芳. 葡萄糖酸锌辅助治疗婴幼儿轮状病毒肠炎的临床研究[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(5): 601-604. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2015.05.010.
[1] 陶宏宇, 叶菁菁, 俞劲, 杨秀珍, 钱晶晶, 徐彬, 徐玮泽, 舒强. 右心声学造影在儿童右向左分流相关疾病中的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 959-965.
[2] 刘琴, 刘瀚旻, 谢亮. 基质金属蛋白酶在儿童哮喘发生机制中作用的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 564-568.
[3] 向韵, 卢游, 杨凡. 全氟及多氟烷基化合物暴露与儿童肥胖症相关性研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 569-574.
[4] 刘冉佳, 崔向丽, 周效竹, 曲伟, 朱志军. 儿童肝移植受者健康相关生存质量评价的荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 302-309.
[5] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
[6] 刘春军, 严方方, 王宝锋, 常婷婷, 郭红红, 李志强. 替加环素联合人免疫球蛋白治疗XDRAB致VAP 的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 797-800.
[7] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中华医学会外科学分会外科手术学学组, 中华医学会外科学分会移植学组, 华南劈离式肝移植联盟. 劈离式供肝儿童肝移植中国临床操作指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 593-601.
[8] 刘军, 丘文静, 孙方昊, 李松盈, 易述红, 傅斌生, 杨扬, 罗慧. 在体与离体劈离式肝移植在儿童肝移植中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 688-693.
[9] 董晓斌, 张静, 苏莎莎, 莎比亚·沙吾提, 盛好. 溃疡性结肠炎患者相关环状RNA 差异表达谱分析及功能研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 499-509.
[10] 李元新, 徐田磊, 刘伯涛. 第四代达芬奇机器人辅助慢性放射性肠炎确定性手术一例(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 435-440.
[11] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[12] 陈利, 杨长青, 朱风尚. 重视炎症性肠病和代谢相关脂肪性肝病间的串话机制研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 385-389.
[13] 孙文恺, 沈青, 杭丽, 张迎春. 纤维蛋白原与清蛋白比值、中性粒细胞与白蛋白比值、C反应蛋白与溃疡性结肠炎病情评估和预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 426-431.
[14] 陈晓胜, 何佳, 刘方, 吴蕊, 杨海涛, 樊晓寒. 直立倾斜试验诱发31 秒心脏停搏的植入心脏起搏器儿童一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 488-494.
[15] 曹亚丽, 高雨萌, 张英谦, 李博, 杜军保, 金红芳. 儿童坐位不耐受的临床进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?