切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06) : 679 -684. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.06.009

论著

中、晚孕期胎儿超声检查对胎儿颅内出血的临床诊断价值
雷晓霞, 罗红()   
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-08 修回日期:2021-11-08 出版日期:2021-12-01
  • 通信作者: 罗红

Diagnostic value of fetal intracranial hemorrhage by fetal ultrasonography in the second and third trimesters

Xiaoxia Lei, Hong Luo()   

  • Received:2021-07-08 Revised:2021-11-08 Published:2021-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Hong Luo
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Project(2016YFC1000102)
引用本文:

雷晓霞, 罗红. 中、晚孕期胎儿超声检查对胎儿颅内出血的临床诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(06): 679-684.

Xiaoxia Lei, Hong Luo. Diagnostic value of fetal intracranial hemorrhage by fetal ultrasonography in the second and third trimesters[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2021, 17(06): 679-684.

目的

探讨中、晚孕期胎儿超声检查诊断胎儿颅内出血(FICH)的临床价值。

方法

选择2014年9月至2020年1月,在四川大学华西第二医院经胎儿MRI确诊为FICH的40例胎龄为(28.3±4.2)周(22~36周)胎儿为研究对象,其孕母年龄为(27.5±4.4)岁(19~34岁)。采用Fisher确切概率法,对胎儿超声和MRI检查对中、晚孕期FICH检出率进行统计学比较。本研究遵循的程序符合2013年修订的《世界医学会赫尔辛基宣言》要求。

结果

这40例FICH均于中、晚孕期被发现:①胎儿头颅超声检查结果提示FICH为33例,包括室管膜下稍强回声(3例)、无回声(1例);脑室内稍强回声(10例)、不均匀回声(2例);脉络丛稍强回声(2例)、无回声(2例)、弱回声(1例)、不均匀回声(3例);脑实质稍强回声(3例)、无回声(2例)、弱回声(2例)、不均匀回声(2例)。②这33例FICH胎儿中,17例为胎儿侧脑室增宽(6例为轻度增宽,6例为中度增宽,5例为脑积水)。③40例FICH胎儿的MRI表现为:脑室内出血(15例)、脑实质出血(8例),生发层出血(16例),硬膜下出血(1例)。④中、晚孕期胎儿超声的FICH检出率分别为94.4%(17/18)、72.7%(16/22)。晚孕期胎儿超声与MRI对FICH检出率比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.010)。

结论

胎儿超声对FICH诊断具有较高准确性,并且方便、安全、经济,可实时采集图像而被作为FICH检查的首选方法。晚孕期胎儿超声对胎儿头颅切面显示困难时,MRI的胎儿头颅检查结果可作为补充。

Objective

To explore clinical application value of diagnosis of fetal intracranial hemorrhage (FICH) by fetal ultrasonography in the second and third trimester of pregnancy.

Methods

A total of 40 fetuses diagnosed as FICH by fetal MRI during the second and third trimesters in West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University from September 2014 to January 2020 were enrolled. The gestational age of 40 fetuses were (28.3±4.2) weeks (22-36 gestational weeks), and their maternal age was (27.5±4.4) years (19-34 years). The detection rates of FICH by fetal ultrasonography and MRI during the second and third trimesters were compared by Fisher exact probability test.The procedure followed in this study met requirements of the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association revised in 2013.

Results

The prenatal imaging examination results of 40 cases of FICH by fetal ultrasonography in the second and third trimester were as follows. ①33 cases were diagnosed as FICH. Among their ultrasounic images, subependymal slightly strong echo and echoless were 3 cases and 1 case, respectively; intraventricular slightly strong echo and uneven echo were 10 and 2 cases, respectively; choroid plexus slightly strong and anechoic were 2 cases, choroid plexus weak echo was 1 case and 3 cases of uneven echo respectively; 3 cases of slightly strong brain parenchyma, 2 cases of echoless, weak echo and uneven echo of brain parenchyma. ②Among these 33 cases of FICH, 17 cases were complicated by lateral ventricle widened(slightly widened, moderately widened and hydrocephalus were 6, 6, 5 cases, respectively). ③Among 40 cases of FICH, their imaging features were intraventricular hemorrhage (15 cases), cerebral parenchymal hemorrhage (8 cases), mucous layer hemorrhage (16 cases) and subdural hemorrhage (1 case). ④The detection rate of FICH by fetal ultrasonography in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy were 94.4%(17/18), 72.7%(16/22), respectively. In the third trimester of pregnancy, the detection rate of FICH by fetal MRI was much higher than that by fetal ultrasonography, and the difference was significant (P=0.010).

Conclusions

Diagnostic of FICH by fetal ultrasonography has advantage of convenience, safety and economy, fetal ultrasonography can be used as the first choice method. If the ultrasound section of fetal head shows difficulty, fetal MRI can be used as a supplementary imaging assisted examination method to provide more accurate information for FICH.

表1 33例FICH胎儿超声检查的胎儿头颅声像特征(例)
图3 1例胎龄为26+3周FICH胎儿(女性)的头颅超声声像图(红色箭头示右侧侧脑室扩张伴稍强回声)
图5 1例FICH胎儿(男性)的头颅影像学检查结果(图5A:胎龄为28+6周时的头颅超声声像图,仅提示右侧侧脑室增宽,红色箭头所示;图5B:胎龄为29+5周时的胎儿头颅MRI检查示T2W少许线状低信号影,右侧侧脑室增宽伴前角少量出血,红色箭头所示)
[1]
Cavaliere AF, Turrini I, Pallottini M, et al. Genetic profiling of idiopathic antenatal intracranial haemorrhage: what we know?[J]. Genes, 2021, 12(4): 573. DOI: 10.3390/genes12040573.
[2]
Adiego B, Martínez-Ten P, Bermejo C, et al. Fetal intracranial hemorrhage. Prenatal diagnosis and postnatal outcomes[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2019, 32(1):21-30. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1369521.
[3]
Qi W, Luo JY, Li ZL, et al. Clinical analysis of eight cases of fetal intracranial hemorrhage in pregnancy[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2021, 34(16): 2609-2615. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1670791.
[4]
王彤,张军.磁共振成像评价胎儿颅内出血:与超声对照分析[J].中国医学影像技术201632(7): 1088-1091. DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289.2016.07.027.
[5]
周立霞,寇晨光,卜静英,等.胎儿颅内出血的MRI诊断[J].中国医学影像学杂志2018, 26(4): 252-257. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2018.04.003.
[6]
李军. 产前诊断技术与胎儿畸形评估[M].西安:世界图书出版公司,2018: 355-356.
[7]
欧阳鲁平,覃秀云,韦慧,等. 单核苷酸多态性微阵列芯片技术在侧脑室增宽胎儿产前诊断中的应用价值[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)2020, 16(3): 322-328. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.03.010,.
[8]
Funamoto K, Ito T, Funamoto K, et al. Ultrasound imaging of mouse fetal intracranial hemorrhage due to ischemia/reperfusion[J]. Front Physiol, 2017, 8: 340. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00340.
[9]
Capasso L, Coppola C, Vendemmia M, et al. Severe fetal intracranial hemorrhage: congenital cytomegalovirus infection may play a role? A case report and review of literature[J]. IDCases, 2021, 25: e01188. DOI: 10.1016/j.idcr.2021.e01188.
[10]
Sotodate G, Matsumoto A, Konishi Y, et al. Fetal intracranial hemorrhage due to maternal subclinical vitamin K deficiency associated with long-term eating disorder[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2019, 45(2): 461-465. DOI: 10.1111/jog.13825.
[11]
Yamasato K, Kurata N, Towner D. Delayed appearance of a traumatic fetal intracranial hemorrhage[J]. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 2018: 1465034. DOI: 10.1155/2018/1465034.
[12]
Hausman-Kedem M, Malinger G, Modai S, et al. Monogenic causes of apparently idiopathic perinatal intracranial hemorrhage[J]. Ann Neurol, 2021, 89(4): 813-822. DOI: 10.1002/ana.26033.
[13]
王璟,曾慧慧,李东阳,等. 2014—2019年北京市早产儿出生状况及围生结局分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(6): 647-655. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.06.005.
[14]
Adiego B, Martínez-Ten P, Bermejo C, et al. Fetal intracranial hemorrhage. Prenatal diagnosis and postnatal outcomes[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2019, 32(1): 21-30. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1369521.
[15]
李秀梅,陈俊雅,侯新琳,等. 脑室出血胎儿的结局和预后[J]. 中华围产医学杂志2021, 24(1): 3-10. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113903-20200807-00751.
[16]
Mooney NC, Wu L, Vrablik ME. Traumatic fetal intracranial hemorrhage suggested by point-of-care ultrasound[J]. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med, 2018, 2(1): 64-66. DOI: 10.5811/cpcem.2017.11.36214.
[17]
Baburaj R, Rangasami R, Chandrasekharan A, et al. Utility of various ultrafast magnetic resonance sequences in the detection of fetal intracranial hemorrhage[J]. Ann Indian Acad Neurol, 2018, 21(4): 275-279. DOI: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_431_17.
[18]
Tanacan A, Ozgen B, Fadiloglu E, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system abnormalities; neurosonography versus fetal magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2020, 250(1): 195-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.05.013.
[19]
Sanapo L, Whitehead MT, Bulas DI, et al. Fetal intracranial hemorrhage: role of fetal MRI[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2017, 37(8): 827-836. DOI: 10.1002/pd.5096.
[20]
Di Mascio D, Sileo FG, Khalil A, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses with mild or moderate ventriculomegaly in the era of fetal neurosonography: systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 54(2): 164-171. DOI: 10.1002/uog.20197.
[21]
李秀梅,陈俊雅. 胎儿颅内出血的产前诊断及预后研究进展[J]. 现代妇产科进展202130(1):77-80. DOI:10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2021.01.015.
[1] 戴飞, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声定量多参数对主动脉缩窄胎儿心脏结构及功能的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[2] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[3] 杜祖升, 赵博文, 张帧, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺. 应用二维斑点追踪成像技术评估孕周及心尖方向对中晚孕期正常胎儿左心房应变的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 843-851.
[4] 张商迪, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺, 陈阳, 袁华, 陈燕. 中晚孕期胎儿心房内径定量评估心房比例失调胎儿心脏畸形的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 785-793.
[5] 顾莉莉, 姜凡. 安徽省超声产前筛查切面图像质量现状调查情况及分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 671-674.
[6] 王秋莲, 张莹, 李春敏, 徐树明, 张玉奇. 胎儿主动脉弓部梗阻伴发复杂心内畸形的产前超声诊断及漏误诊分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 718-725.
[7] 曾晴, 文华轩, 袁鹰, 廖伊梅, 秦越, 罗丹丹, 梁美玲, 李胜利. 经腹二维超声评价胎儿大脑外侧裂的新参数——外侧裂平台角度[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 454-459.
[8] 王水清, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 马明明, 狄敏. 16~40周正常胎儿左心房后间隙指数及其Z评分的定量研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 460-469.
[9] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[10] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[11] 王濛, 王華麟, 王鉴, 孙锟. 先天性心脏病宫内诊疗现状与展望[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 481-485.
[12] 钱警语, 郑明明. 《2024意大利妇产科学会非侵入性和侵入性产前诊断指南》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
[13] 刘明辉, 葛方明. MRI 对腹股沟疝修补术后患者早期并发症的评估价值研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 579-583.
[14] 张立俊, 孙存杰, 胡春峰, 孟冲, 张辉. MSCT、DCE-MRI 评估术前胃癌TNM 分期的准确性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
[15] 金安松, 邹玉松, 刘玖涛, 薛凤麟, 庞爱兰. 孤立性颅内浆细胞瘤一例及相关文献复习[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 495-500.
阅读次数
全文


摘要