切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (01) : 86 -92. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.01.013

所属专题: 文献

论著

电子胎心监护Ⅱ类图形反复性变异减速产妇分娩终止时限对新生儿结局的影响
王珊珊, 都凌云, 孙青, 李楠()   
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-17 修回日期:2021-01-02 出版日期:2021-02-01
  • 通信作者: 李楠

Influences of delivery termination time on neonatal outcomes in patients with type Ⅱ graphical repetitive variation deceleration of electronic fetal monitoring

Shanshan Wang, Lingyun Du, Qing Sun, Nan Li()   

  • Received:2020-10-17 Revised:2021-01-02 Published:2021-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Nan Li
  • Supported by:
    Health Development Research Special Project of Tongzhou District, Beijing(TF-2017-PT-01-11)
引用本文:

王珊珊, 都凌云, 孙青, 李楠. 电子胎心监护Ⅱ类图形反复性变异减速产妇分娩终止时限对新生儿结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(01): 86-92.

Shanshan Wang, Lingyun Du, Qing Sun, Nan Li. Influences of delivery termination time on neonatal outcomes in patients with type Ⅱ graphical repetitive variation deceleration of electronic fetal monitoring[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2021, 17(01): 86-92.

目的

探讨电子胎心监护(EFM)Ⅱ类图形反复性变异减速(VD)产妇的分娩终止时限对新生儿结局的影响。

方法

选择2015年1月1日至2018年12月31日在北京市通州区妇幼保健院住院分娩,并且胎儿心率出现EFM Ⅱ类图形反复性VD的829例产妇为研究对象。其中,胎儿心率发生轻、中、重度反复性VD的产妇分别为392、246及191例。按照分娩终止时限不同,将其分为3组,A组(n=380,分娩终止时限≤30 min),B组(n=251,分娩终止时限为30~60 min)和C组(n=198,分娩终止时限≥60 min)。392例轻度反复性VD产妇中,分娩终止时限≤30 min、30~60 min和≥60 min者分别为98、163、131例;246例中度VD产妇中,分娩终止时限≤30 min、30~60 min和≥60 min者分别为152、62和32例;191例重度VD产妇中,分娩终止时限≤30 min、30~60 min和≥60 min者分别为96、62和33例。采用χ2检验,对3组不同分娩终止时限产妇的新生儿不良结局进行统计学分析,进一步对轻、中、重度反复性VD产妇不同分娩终止时限所致新生儿不良结局发生率分别进行统计学比较。本研究遵循的程序符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》要求。

结果

①829例EFM Ⅱ类图形反复性VD产妇的年龄为(29.3±3.7)岁,人体质量指数(BMI)为(22.6±3.5) kg/m2;存在脐带异常为578例(69.7%)。②A、B、C组新生儿不良结局发生率分别为2.6%(10/380)、8.8%(22/251)和20.2%(40/198),3者比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=50.675,P<0.001)。③392例轻度反复性VD产妇中,分娩终止时限≤30 min、30~60 min和≥60 min者分娩新生儿不良结局发生率分别为1.0%(1/98)、0.6%(1/162)和1.5%(2/129),3者比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.600,P=0.741)。④246例中度反复性VD产妇中,分娩终止时限≤30 min、30~60 min和≥60 min者分娩新生儿不良结局发生率分别为2.0%(3/152)、9.7%(6/56)和50.0%(16/32), 3者比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=66.805,P<0.001)。⑤191例重度反复性VD产妇中,分娩终止时限≤30 min、30~60 min和≥60 min者分娩新生儿不良结局发生率分别为6.2%(6/96)、24.2%(15/62)和66.7%(22/33),3者比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=51.535,P<0.001)。

结论

EFM Ⅱ类图形中反复性VD产妇,随着分娩终止时限延长,可增加新生儿不良结局发生率。EFM Ⅱ类图形为中至重度反复性VD产妇,应分别在60 min和30 min内及时娩出新生儿。

Objective

To investigate the influences of delivery termination time on neonatal outcomes in patients with type Ⅱ graphical repetitive variation deceleration of electronic fetal monitoring (EFU).

Methods

A total of 829 pregnant women who were hospitalized in Tongzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Beijing from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018 and had repetitive VD of EFM type Ⅱ were selected into this study. According to different delivery termination time, 829 patients were divided into 3 groups, group A (n=380, delivery termination time ≤ 30 min), group B (n=251, delivery termination time was 30-60 min ) and group C (n=198, delivery termination time ≥ 60 min ). In 392 cases of mild VD patients, 98, 163, and 131 patients had delivery termination time ≤30 min, 30-60 min, and ≥60 min, respectively. Among 246 moderate VD patients, 152, 62 and 32 cases had delivery termination time ≤30 min, 30-60 min and ≥60 min, respectively. In 191 severe VD patients, 96, 62 and 33 cases had delivery termination time ≤30 min, 30-60 min and ≥60 min, respectively. Chi-square test was used to statistically compare the incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes caused by different delivery termination time among 3 groups. This study met requirements of World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013.

Results

① Among 829 pregnant women with EFM type Ⅱ repetitive VD, the age was (29.3±3.7) years old, body mass index (BMI) was (22.6±3.5) kg/m2, and 578 cases (69.7%) had umbilical cord abnormalities. ②The incidence of adverse outcomes in group A, B and C was 2.6% (10/380), 8.8% (22/251) and 20.2% (40/198), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=50.675, P<0.001). ③Among 392 patients with mild repetitive VD, the incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes were 1.0% (1/98), 0.6% (1/162) and 1.5% (2/129) for the delivery termination time ≤30 min, 30-60 min and ≥60 min, respectively. There was no significant difference among them (χ2=0.600, P=0.741). ④ In 246 patients with moderate repetitive VD, the incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes in patients with termination time ≤30 min, 30-60 min and ≥60 min were 2.0% (3/152 ), 9.7% (6/56) and 50.0% (16/32), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=66.805, P<0.001). ⑤ In 191 patients with severe repetitive VD, the incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes in patients with termination time ≤30 min, 30-60 min and ≥60 min were 6.2% (6/96 ), 24.2% (15/62) and 66.7% (22/33), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=51.535, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Patients with repetitive VD in EFM type Ⅱ graphical repetitive VD can increase the incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes with prolonged delivery termination time. Neonates with moderate to severe repetitive VD should be delivered within 60 minutes and 30 minutes, respectively.

表1 本研究纳入829例EFM Ⅱ类图形反复性VD产妇的一般临床资料[例数(%)]
表2 3组不同分娩终止时限的EFM Ⅱ类图形出现反复性VD产妇分娩新生儿不良结局比较[例数(%)]
[1]
Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM, et al. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 2: CD006066. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006066.pub3.
[2]
Stout MJ, Cahill AG. Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present, and future[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2011, 38(1): 127-142, vii. DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2010.12.002.
[3]
中华医学会围产医学分会. 电子胎心监护应用专家共识[J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2015, 18(7): 486-490. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2015.07.002.
[4]
孙开琳. 电子胎心监护的临床应用及效果分析[J].河南大学学报(医学版),2014, 33(1): 64-65.
[5]
漆洪波. 产时电子胎心监护的认识[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2008, 4(2): 65-68. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5250.2008.02.001.
[6]
刘菁,董琛琛. 产前电子胎心率变化(EFM)与产后新生儿酸血症的相关性研究[J].中国性科学,2019, 28(4): 98-101. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1993.2019.04.027.
[7]
陈练,李淑芳,王妍. 产时电子胎心监护减速区面积在新生儿酸中毒预测中的价值[J].实用妇产科杂志,2016,32(9):681-684.
[8]
Cahill AG, Tuuli MG, Stout MJ, et al. A prospective cohort study of fetal heart rate monitoring: deceleration area is predictive of fetal acidemia[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 218(5): 523. e1-523. e12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.026.
[9]
孔北华,段涛. 妇产科学[M]. 9版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018.
[10]
Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines[J]. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, 2008, 37(5): 510-515. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00284.x.
[11]
李博雅,杨慧霞. 产时电子胎心监护规范化临床应用的研究进展[J].中华妇产科杂志,2014,49(5):385-388. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2014.05.016.
[12]
姚强,刘兴会. 胎心电子监护国外指南解读[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2010,6(1): 11-13. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5250.2010.01.004.
[13]
李玲. 产程时间相关影响因素分析[J].中国保健营养,2017,27(30): 379-380. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7484.2017.30.612.
[14]
林英.无负荷试验中变异减速波形的临床意义[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2007, 3(3): 158-160. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2007.03.111.
[15]
李娟,杨哲锋.产妇胎心监护中异常情况临床分析及护理措施研究[J].中国保健营养,2019, 29(20): 249-250.
[16]
阮建容,李绍楠. 胎心监护异常的观察与临床护理心得体会[J].中国卫生标准管理,2018,9(1):163-164. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2018.01.094.
[17]
Blankenship SA, Raghuraman N, Delhi A, et al. Association of abnormal first stage of labor duration and maternal and neonatal morbidity[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 223(3): 445.e1-445.e15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.053.
[18]
韩淑娟,齐卫红. 第一产程胎心监护图形异常对围生儿结局的影响[J].山东医药,2008, 48(31): 77-78. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2008.31.037.
[19]
宗晓亮,王晓春. 第一产程胎心监护图形异常对围生儿结局的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践,2017, 2(10): 100-101. DOI: 10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413.201710051.
[20]
李璠璠,邓东锐. 第二产程胎心监护异常标准化评判和处理[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2014,30(6): 421-425. DOI: 10.7504/fk2014050108.
[21]
赵淑芬,汤本才. 第二产程反复性变异减速伴正常变异对新生儿结局的影响[J].医药前沿,2018, 8(2): 136-138. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1752.2018.02.116.
[22]
Clark SL, Nageotte MP, Garite TJ, et al. Intrapartum management of category Ⅱ fetal heart rate tracings: towards standardization of care[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 209(2): 89-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.04.030.
[23]
Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines[J]. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, 2008, 37(5): 510-515. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00284.x.
[24]
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 114(1): 192-202. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181aef106.
[1] 戴飞, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声定量多参数对主动脉缩窄胎儿心脏结构及功能的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[2] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[3] 杜祖升, 赵博文, 张帧, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺. 应用二维斑点追踪成像技术评估孕周及心尖方向对中晚孕期正常胎儿左心房应变的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 843-851.
[4] 张商迪, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺, 陈阳, 袁华, 陈燕. 中晚孕期胎儿心房内径定量评估心房比例失调胎儿心脏畸形的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 785-793.
[5] 王秋莲, 张莹, 李春敏, 徐树明, 张玉奇. 胎儿主动脉弓部梗阻伴发复杂心内畸形的产前超声诊断及漏误诊分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 718-725.
[6] 顾莉莉, 姜凡. 安徽省超声产前筛查切面图像质量现状调查情况及分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 671-674.
[7] 王濛, 王華麟, 王鉴, 孙锟. 先天性心脏病宫内诊疗现状与展望[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 481-485.
[8] 李霞林, 贺芳. 产后出血风险评估和早期预警系统[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 498-503.
[9] 刘子洋, 崔俭俭, 赵茵. 产科弥散性血管内凝血及其评分系统的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 511-518.
[10] 曾凡英, 阮洁, 刘兴会, 何国琳. 新生育形势下的围产医学研究现状及孕期保健中的应对策略[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 519-524.
[11] 李小飞, 刘洪莉, 石丘玲, 田静, 李莉, 漆洪波, 罗欣. 自然分娩产妇低强度聚焦超声子宫复旧治疗防治产后出血的前瞻性随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 534-539.
[12] 邵世锋, 肖钦, 沈方龙, 张迅, 郝志鹏, 伍正彬, 谢晓娟, 王耀丽. 老年胸主动脉钝性伤的重症救治分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 762-767.
[13] 刘春峰, 徐朝晖, 施红伟, 陈瑢, 马腾飞, 李鹏飞, 袁蓉, 陈建荣, 徐爱明. 机械通气患者肌肉减少症的诊断及其对预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 820-825.
[14] 张平骥, 徐钰, 李天水, 庞文翼, 符师宁, 张梦圆. 重症患者镇静治疗现状及期望的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 562-567.
[15] 李璇, 邓岚, 郭微, 邓永梅, 刘杰昕. 标准化皮肤管理流程在防治脑卒中患者失禁相关性皮炎中的应用[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 479-482.
阅读次数
全文


摘要