切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06) : 665 -671. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.06.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

胎儿脐动脉舒张末期血流缺失及脑-胎盘率降低与妊娠结局及存活儿早期预后
张海燕1, 俞兆儿2, 王一枭2, 高明明2, 贾瑞喆2,()   
  1. 1. 南京医科大学附属逸夫医院妇产科 211100
    2. 南京医科大学附属妇产医院(南京市 妇幼保健院)产科 210004
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-03 修回日期:2020-11-20 出版日期:2020-12-01
  • 通信作者: 贾瑞喆

Fetal umbilical artery absent end-diastolic flow and decreased cerebral-placental ratio and pregnancy outcome and prognosis of survival children

Haiyan Zhang1, Zhaoer Yu2, Yixiao Wang2, Mingming Gao2, Ruizhe Jia2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211100, Jiangsu Province, China
    2. Department of Obstetrics, Women′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital), Nanjing 210004, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2020-11-03 Revised:2020-11-20 Published:2020-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Ruizhe Jia
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81971393)
引用本文:

张海燕, 俞兆儿, 王一枭, 高明明, 贾瑞喆. 胎儿脐动脉舒张末期血流缺失及脑-胎盘率降低与妊娠结局及存活儿早期预后[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(06): 665-671.

Haiyan Zhang, Zhaoer Yu, Yixiao Wang, Mingming Gao, Ruizhe Jia. Fetal umbilical artery absent end-diastolic flow and decreased cerebral-placental ratio and pregnancy outcome and prognosis of survival children[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2020, 16(06): 665-671.

目的

探讨胎儿脐动脉舒张末期血流缺失(AEDF)和(或)脑-胎盘率降低(CRP<1),对妊娠结局及存活儿早期预后影响。

方法

选取2015年1月至2019年12月,在南京医科大学附属妇产医院住院治疗的发生胎儿脐动脉AEDF和(或)CRP<1,并且符合本研究纳入与排除标准的103例孕妇为研究对象。根据临床对孕妇的综合评估,将其分为终止妊娠组(n=64)与继续妊娠组(n=39)。收集2组孕妇的年龄、身高、体重,发生胎儿脐动脉AEDF和(或)CRP<1时孕妇孕龄,孕妇及新生儿妊娠结局,以及存活儿早期预后。采用成组t检验或χ2检验,对上述指标进行统计学比较。2组孕妇年龄、身高、体重等一般临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究遵循的程序符合南京医科大学附属妇产医院伦理委员会审核批准(审批文号:宁妇伦字[2019]KY-046)。

结果

①终止妊娠组孕妇发生胎儿脐动脉AEDF和(或)CRP<1时,孕妇孕龄为(34.6±3.0)孕周,显著大于继续妊娠组的(29.3±3.5)孕周,并差异有统计学意义(t=8.286,P<0.001)。②2组孕妇分娩孕龄比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。继续妊娠组新生儿的出生体重为(1 527.5± 828.3) g,显著低于终止妊娠组的(1 894.3±696.5) g,并且差异有统计学意义(t=2.289,P=0.029)。继续妊娠组新生儿窒息发生率为16.7%(5/30),显著低于终止妊娠组的1.5%(1/65),并且差异亦有统计学意义(χ2=5.589,P=0.018)。③继续妊娠组39例孕妇中,9例(23.1%)发生胎死宫内,发生胎死宫内时间为发生胎儿脐动脉AEDF和(或)CRP<1后第4~33天(平均为第16.6天)。终止妊娠组孕妇无一例发生胎死宫内,继续妊娠组孕妇胎死宫内发生率,显著高于终止妊娠组,并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=13.420,P<0.001)。④终止妊娠组与继续妊娠组存活儿的营养不良、孤独症谱系障碍、运动发育落后、发育迟缓、语言障碍、视力障碍、听力障碍发生率分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

孕妇发生胎儿脐动脉AEDF和(或)CRP<1时,提示宫内缺氧严重,甚至已较长时间,即使采取急诊剖宫产术终止妊娠,部分患儿仍然遗留神经发育异常症状。对此类孕妇采取期待妊娠治疗,延长孕龄的同时,也可能增加胎死宫内及新生儿窒息发生率,在期待妊娠治疗中加强胎心监护,并适时终止妊娠尤为重要。

Objective

To explore influences of fetal umbilical artery absent end-diastolic flow (AEDF) and/or decreased cerebral-placental ratio (CRP)<1 on pregnancy outcome and prognosis of survival children.

Methods

A total of 103 pregnant women who hospitalized in Women′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2015 to December 2019, with fetal umbilical artery AEDF or CRP<1 and met inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study were selected as research subjects. According to clinical comprehensive evaluation results of pregnant women, they were divided into two groups: termination group (n=64) and continued pregnancy group (n=39). Data were collected concerning the age, height, weight of two groups of pregnant women, gestational age when fetal umbilical artery AEDF and/or CRP<1 occurred, pregnancy outcome of pregnant women and neonates, as well as early prognosis of surviving children. Using independent-samples t test or chi-square test, the above indicators were statistically compared. There were no statistically significant differences between two groups of pregnant women in terms of their age, height, weight and other general clinical data (P>0.05). The procedure followed in this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Women′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Approval No.[2019]KY-046).

Results

①The gestational age when fetal umbilical artery AEDF or CRP<1 occurred in pregnant women in termination group was (34.6±3.0) gestational weeks, which was significantly greater than (29.3±3.5) gestational weeks of continued pregnancy group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=8.286, P<0.001). ②There was no significant difference in gestational age of delivery between two groups (P>0.05). The neonatal birth weight in continued pregnancy group was (1 527.5±828.3) g, which was significantly lower than that of termination group (1 894.3± 696.5) g, and the difference was statistically significant (t=2.289, P=0.029). The incidence of neonatal asphyxia was 16.7% (5/30) in continued pregnancy group, which was significantly lower than 1.5% (1/65) in termination group, and the difference also was statistically significant (χ2=5.589, P=0.018). ③Among 39 pregnant women in continued pregnancy group, 9 cases (23.1%) had intrauterine fetal death, and the time of intrauterine fetal death was 4 to 33 days after the occurrence of fetal umbilical artery AEDF and/or CRP<1 (average 16.6 days). There was no intrauterine fetal death in pregnant women in termination group. Incidence of intrauterine fetal death of pregnant women in continued pregnancy group was significantly higher than that in termination group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=13.420, P<0.001). ④There were no statistically significant differences in incidence of malnutrition, autism spectrum disorder, motor development retardation, developmental delay, language disorders, visual disorders, and hearing disorders among surviving children in termination group and continued pregnancy group (P>0.05).

Conclusions

When fetal umbilical artery AEDF and/or CRP<1 occurs in pregnant women, it indicates that intrauterine hypoxia has been quite serious, and has even existed for a long time. Even if the pregnancy is terminated by emergency cesarean section, some children would still have symptoms of abnormal neuro-development. Expectant pregnancy treatment for such pregnant women will not only prolong the gestational age, but also may increase the incidence of intrauterine death and neonatal asphyxia. It is of particular importance to strengthen the antepartum fetal heart surveillance and adopt timely termination of pregnancy in treatment of expectant pregnancy.

表1 2组胎儿脐动脉AEDF和(或)CRP<1孕妇一般临床资料比较(±s)
表2 2组胎儿脐动脉AEDF和(或)CRP<1孕妇分娩新生儿的妊娠结局比较
表3 2组存活儿早期预后比较[例数(%)]
[1]
景柏华,陈倩. 胎儿大脑中动脉血流检测的临床意义[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2019, 35(12): 893-896.
[2]
周漾,丁依玲. 脐动脉血流监测临床应用的研究进展[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2019, 35(12): 890-893.
[3]
Oros D, Ruiz-Martinez S, Staines-Urias E, et al. Reference ranges for Doppler indices of umbilical and fetal middle cerebral arteries and cerebroplacental ratio: systematic review[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 53(4): 454-464. DOI: 10.1002/uog.20102.
[4]
Meher S, Hernandez-Andrade E, Basheer SN, et al. Impact of cerebral redistribution on neurodevelopmental outcome in small-for-gestational-age or growth-restricted babies: a systematic review[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 46(4): 398-404. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14818.
[5]
Flood K, Unterscheider J, Daly S, et al. The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO study[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 211(3): 288.e1-288.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.008.
[6]
Binder J, Monaghan C, Thilaganathan B, et al. Reduced fetal movements and cerebroplacental ratio: evidence for worsening fetal hypoxemia[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 51(3): 375-380. DOI: 10.1002/uog.18830.
[7]
Bhide A, Acharya G, Bilardo CM, er al. ISUOG practice guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 41(2): 233-239. DOI: 10.1002/uog.12371.
[8]
Hadders-Algra M. General movements: a window for early identification of children at high risk for developmental disorders[J]. J Pediatr, 2004, 145(2 Suppl): S12-S18. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.05.017.
[9]
Guo C, Luo M, Wang X, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of modified checklist for autism in toddlers, revised, with follow-up (M-CHAT-R/F)[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2019, 49(1): 185-196. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-018-3682-y.
[10]
You J, Shamsi BH, Hao MC, et al. A study on the neurodevelopment outcomes of late preterm infants[J]. BMC Neurol, 2019, 19(1): 108. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-019-1336-0.
[11]
WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age[J]. Acta Paediatr Suppl, 2006, 450: 76-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.tb02378.x.
[12]
Simonazzi G, Curti A, Cattani L, et al. Outcome of severe placental insufficiency with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler prior to fetal viability[J]. BJOG, 2013, 120(6): 754-757. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12133.
[13]
Caradeux J, Martinez-Portilla RJ, Basuki TR, et al. Risk of fetal death in growth-restricted fetuses with umbilical and/or ductus venosus absent or reversed end-diastolic velocities before 34 weeks of gestation: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 218(2S): S774.e21-S782.e21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.566.
[14]
Gratacós E, Lewi L, Carreras E, et al. Incidence and characteristics of umbilical artery intermittent absent and/or reversed end-diastolic flow in complicated and uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 23(5): 456-460. DOI: 10.1002/uog.1013.
[15]
Mose JC. The role of maternal & fetal doppler in pre-eclampsia[J].Pregnancy Hypertens, 2014, 4(3): 242. DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2014.04.010.
[16]
Khalil A, Morales-Roselló J, Townsend R, et al. Value of third-trimester cerebroplacental ratio and uterine artery Doppler indices as predictors of stillbirth and perinatal loss[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 47(1): 74-80. DOI: 10.1002/uog.15729.
[17]
Baschat AA. Planning management and delivery of the growth-restricted fetus[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2018, 49: 53-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.009.
[18]
王晓银,肖兵. 脐动脉舒张期血流的缺失[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2007, 22(8): 1125-1127. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4411.2007.08.075.
[19]
Yagel S, Kivilevitch Z, Cohen SM, et al. The fetal venous system, part Ⅱ:ultrasound evaluation of the fetus with congenital venous system malformation or developing circulatory compromise[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 36(1): 93-111. DOI: 10.1002/uog.7622.
[20]
Turan S, Turan OM, Berg C, et al. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 30(5): 750-756. DOI: 10.1002/uog.4101.
[21]
Thapar A, Cooper M, Rutter M. Neurodevelopmental disorders[J]. Lancet Psychiatry, 2017, 4(4): 339-346. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30376-5.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 武玺宁, 欧阳云淑, 张一休, 孟华, 徐钟慧, 张培培, 吕珂. 胎儿心脏超声检查在抗SSA/Ro-SSB/La抗体阳性妊娠管理中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1056-1060.
[3] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[4] 赵红娟, 赵博文, 潘美, 纪园园, 彭晓慧, 陈冉. 应用多普勒超声定量分析正常中晚孕期胎儿左心室收缩舒张时间指数[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 951-958.
[5] 张璟璟, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 毛彦恺, 潘陈可, 朱玲艳, 朱琳琳, 蓝秋晔. 胎儿超声心动图测量McGoon指数在评价胎儿肺血管发育中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 860-865.
[6] 旺久, 陈军, 朱霞, 米玛央金, 赵胜, 陈欣林, 李建华, 王双. 山南市妇幼保健院开展胎儿系统超声筛查的效果分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 728-733.
[7] 徐鹏, 李军, 高巍伦, 王峥, 庞珅, 李春妮, 朱霆. 快速旋转扫查法在胎儿超声心动图检查中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 761-766.
[8] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 沈玉琴, 李炎菲海, 王海蕊, 范思涵, 纪学芹. 胎儿心脏定量分析技术对正常胎儿心脏形态及收缩功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 598-604.
[9] 罗刚, 泮思林, 陈涛涛, 许茜, 纪志娴, 王思宝, 孙玲玉. 超声心动图在胎儿心脏介入治疗室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 605-609.
[10] 黄佳, 石华, 张玉国, 胡佳琪, 陈茜. 胎儿左头臂静脉正常与异常超声图像特征及其临床意义[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 610-617.
[11] 袁泽, 庄丽. 超声检测胎儿脐动脉和大脑中动脉血流对胎儿宫内窘迫的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 618-621.
[12] 刘镭, 杨昕, 许晓华, 林胜谋, 熊初琴, 农丽录, 董振宇, 李胜利. 中孕期胎儿鼻前皮肤厚度及鼻骨长度筛查胎儿染色体病的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(05): 506-510.
[13] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[14] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[15] 李变, 王莉娜, 桑田, 李珊, 杜雪燕, 李春华, 张兴云, 管巧, 王颖, 冯琪, 蒙景雯. 亚低温技术治疗缺氧缺血性脑病新生儿的临床分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
阅读次数
全文


摘要