切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06) : 665 -671. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.06.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

胎儿脐动脉舒张末期血流缺失及脑-胎盘率降低与妊娠结局及存活儿早期预后
张海燕1, 俞兆儿2, 王一枭2, 高明明2, 贾瑞喆2,()   
  1. 1. 南京医科大学附属逸夫医院妇产科 211100
    2. 南京医科大学附属妇产医院(南京市 妇幼保健院)产科 210004
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-03 修回日期:2020-11-20 出版日期:2020-12-01
  • 通信作者: 贾瑞喆

Fetal umbilical artery absent end-diastolic flow and decreased cerebral-placental ratio and pregnancy outcome and prognosis of survival children

Haiyan Zhang1, Zhaoer Yu2, Yixiao Wang2, Mingming Gao2, Ruizhe Jia2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211100, Jiangsu Province, China
    2. Department of Obstetrics, Women′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital), Nanjing 210004, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2020-11-03 Revised:2020-11-20 Published:2020-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Ruizhe Jia
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81971393)
引用本文:

张海燕, 俞兆儿, 王一枭, 高明明, 贾瑞喆. 胎儿脐动脉舒张末期血流缺失及脑-胎盘率降低与妊娠结局及存活儿早期预后[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(06): 665-671.

Haiyan Zhang, Zhaoer Yu, Yixiao Wang, Mingming Gao, Ruizhe Jia. Fetal umbilical artery absent end-diastolic flow and decreased cerebral-placental ratio and pregnancy outcome and prognosis of survival children[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2020, 16(06): 665-671.

目的

探讨胎儿脐动脉舒张末期血流缺失(AEDF)和(或)脑-胎盘率降低(CRP<1),对妊娠结局及存活儿早期预后影响。

方法

选取2015年1月至2019年12月,在南京医科大学附属妇产医院住院治疗的发生胎儿脐动脉AEDF和(或)CRP<1,并且符合本研究纳入与排除标准的103例孕妇为研究对象。根据临床对孕妇的综合评估,将其分为终止妊娠组(n=64)与继续妊娠组(n=39)。收集2组孕妇的年龄、身高、体重,发生胎儿脐动脉AEDF和(或)CRP<1时孕妇孕龄,孕妇及新生儿妊娠结局,以及存活儿早期预后。采用成组t检验或χ2检验,对上述指标进行统计学比较。2组孕妇年龄、身高、体重等一般临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究遵循的程序符合南京医科大学附属妇产医院伦理委员会审核批准(审批文号:宁妇伦字[2019]KY-046)。

结果

①终止妊娠组孕妇发生胎儿脐动脉AEDF和(或)CRP<1时,孕妇孕龄为(34.6±3.0)孕周,显著大于继续妊娠组的(29.3±3.5)孕周,并差异有统计学意义(t=8.286,P<0.001)。②2组孕妇分娩孕龄比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。继续妊娠组新生儿的出生体重为(1 527.5± 828.3) g,显著低于终止妊娠组的(1 894.3±696.5) g,并且差异有统计学意义(t=2.289,P=0.029)。继续妊娠组新生儿窒息发生率为16.7%(5/30),显著低于终止妊娠组的1.5%(1/65),并且差异亦有统计学意义(χ2=5.589,P=0.018)。③继续妊娠组39例孕妇中,9例(23.1%)发生胎死宫内,发生胎死宫内时间为发生胎儿脐动脉AEDF和(或)CRP<1后第4~33天(平均为第16.6天)。终止妊娠组孕妇无一例发生胎死宫内,继续妊娠组孕妇胎死宫内发生率,显著高于终止妊娠组,并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=13.420,P<0.001)。④终止妊娠组与继续妊娠组存活儿的营养不良、孤独症谱系障碍、运动发育落后、发育迟缓、语言障碍、视力障碍、听力障碍发生率分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

孕妇发生胎儿脐动脉AEDF和(或)CRP<1时,提示宫内缺氧严重,甚至已较长时间,即使采取急诊剖宫产术终止妊娠,部分患儿仍然遗留神经发育异常症状。对此类孕妇采取期待妊娠治疗,延长孕龄的同时,也可能增加胎死宫内及新生儿窒息发生率,在期待妊娠治疗中加强胎心监护,并适时终止妊娠尤为重要。

Objective

To explore influences of fetal umbilical artery absent end-diastolic flow (AEDF) and/or decreased cerebral-placental ratio (CRP)<1 on pregnancy outcome and prognosis of survival children.

Methods

A total of 103 pregnant women who hospitalized in Women′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2015 to December 2019, with fetal umbilical artery AEDF or CRP<1 and met inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study were selected as research subjects. According to clinical comprehensive evaluation results of pregnant women, they were divided into two groups: termination group (n=64) and continued pregnancy group (n=39). Data were collected concerning the age, height, weight of two groups of pregnant women, gestational age when fetal umbilical artery AEDF and/or CRP<1 occurred, pregnancy outcome of pregnant women and neonates, as well as early prognosis of surviving children. Using independent-samples t test or chi-square test, the above indicators were statistically compared. There were no statistically significant differences between two groups of pregnant women in terms of their age, height, weight and other general clinical data (P>0.05). The procedure followed in this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Women′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Approval No.[2019]KY-046).

Results

①The gestational age when fetal umbilical artery AEDF or CRP<1 occurred in pregnant women in termination group was (34.6±3.0) gestational weeks, which was significantly greater than (29.3±3.5) gestational weeks of continued pregnancy group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=8.286, P<0.001). ②There was no significant difference in gestational age of delivery between two groups (P>0.05). The neonatal birth weight in continued pregnancy group was (1 527.5±828.3) g, which was significantly lower than that of termination group (1 894.3± 696.5) g, and the difference was statistically significant (t=2.289, P=0.029). The incidence of neonatal asphyxia was 16.7% (5/30) in continued pregnancy group, which was significantly lower than 1.5% (1/65) in termination group, and the difference also was statistically significant (χ2=5.589, P=0.018). ③Among 39 pregnant women in continued pregnancy group, 9 cases (23.1%) had intrauterine fetal death, and the time of intrauterine fetal death was 4 to 33 days after the occurrence of fetal umbilical artery AEDF and/or CRP<1 (average 16.6 days). There was no intrauterine fetal death in pregnant women in termination group. Incidence of intrauterine fetal death of pregnant women in continued pregnancy group was significantly higher than that in termination group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=13.420, P<0.001). ④There were no statistically significant differences in incidence of malnutrition, autism spectrum disorder, motor development retardation, developmental delay, language disorders, visual disorders, and hearing disorders among surviving children in termination group and continued pregnancy group (P>0.05).

Conclusions

When fetal umbilical artery AEDF and/or CRP<1 occurs in pregnant women, it indicates that intrauterine hypoxia has been quite serious, and has even existed for a long time. Even if the pregnancy is terminated by emergency cesarean section, some children would still have symptoms of abnormal neuro-development. Expectant pregnancy treatment for such pregnant women will not only prolong the gestational age, but also may increase the incidence of intrauterine death and neonatal asphyxia. It is of particular importance to strengthen the antepartum fetal heart surveillance and adopt timely termination of pregnancy in treatment of expectant pregnancy.

表1 2组胎儿脐动脉AEDF和(或)CRP<1孕妇一般临床资料比较(±s)
表2 2组胎儿脐动脉AEDF和(或)CRP<1孕妇分娩新生儿的妊娠结局比较
表3 2组存活儿早期预后比较[例数(%)]
[1]
景柏华,陈倩. 胎儿大脑中动脉血流检测的临床意义[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2019, 35(12): 893-896.
[2]
周漾,丁依玲. 脐动脉血流监测临床应用的研究进展[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2019, 35(12): 890-893.
[3]
Oros D, Ruiz-Martinez S, Staines-Urias E, et al. Reference ranges for Doppler indices of umbilical and fetal middle cerebral arteries and cerebroplacental ratio: systematic review[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 53(4): 454-464. DOI: 10.1002/uog.20102.
[4]
Meher S, Hernandez-Andrade E, Basheer SN, et al. Impact of cerebral redistribution on neurodevelopmental outcome in small-for-gestational-age or growth-restricted babies: a systematic review[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 46(4): 398-404. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14818.
[5]
Flood K, Unterscheider J, Daly S, et al. The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO study[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 211(3): 288.e1-288.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.008.
[6]
Binder J, Monaghan C, Thilaganathan B, et al. Reduced fetal movements and cerebroplacental ratio: evidence for worsening fetal hypoxemia[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 51(3): 375-380. DOI: 10.1002/uog.18830.
[7]
Bhide A, Acharya G, Bilardo CM, er al. ISUOG practice guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 41(2): 233-239. DOI: 10.1002/uog.12371.
[8]
Hadders-Algra M. General movements: a window for early identification of children at high risk for developmental disorders[J]. J Pediatr, 2004, 145(2 Suppl): S12-S18. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.05.017.
[9]
Guo C, Luo M, Wang X, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of modified checklist for autism in toddlers, revised, with follow-up (M-CHAT-R/F)[J]. J Autism Dev Disord, 2019, 49(1): 185-196. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-018-3682-y.
[10]
You J, Shamsi BH, Hao MC, et al. A study on the neurodevelopment outcomes of late preterm infants[J]. BMC Neurol, 2019, 19(1): 108. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-019-1336-0.
[11]
WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age[J]. Acta Paediatr Suppl, 2006, 450: 76-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.tb02378.x.
[12]
Simonazzi G, Curti A, Cattani L, et al. Outcome of severe placental insufficiency with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler prior to fetal viability[J]. BJOG, 2013, 120(6): 754-757. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12133.
[13]
Caradeux J, Martinez-Portilla RJ, Basuki TR, et al. Risk of fetal death in growth-restricted fetuses with umbilical and/or ductus venosus absent or reversed end-diastolic velocities before 34 weeks of gestation: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 218(2S): S774.e21-S782.e21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.566.
[14]
Gratacós E, Lewi L, Carreras E, et al. Incidence and characteristics of umbilical artery intermittent absent and/or reversed end-diastolic flow in complicated and uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 23(5): 456-460. DOI: 10.1002/uog.1013.
[15]
Mose JC. The role of maternal & fetal doppler in pre-eclampsia[J].Pregnancy Hypertens, 2014, 4(3): 242. DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2014.04.010.
[16]
Khalil A, Morales-Roselló J, Townsend R, et al. Value of third-trimester cerebroplacental ratio and uterine artery Doppler indices as predictors of stillbirth and perinatal loss[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 47(1): 74-80. DOI: 10.1002/uog.15729.
[17]
Baschat AA. Planning management and delivery of the growth-restricted fetus[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2018, 49: 53-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.02.009.
[18]
王晓银,肖兵. 脐动脉舒张期血流的缺失[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2007, 22(8): 1125-1127. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4411.2007.08.075.
[19]
Yagel S, Kivilevitch Z, Cohen SM, et al. The fetal venous system, part Ⅱ:ultrasound evaluation of the fetus with congenital venous system malformation or developing circulatory compromise[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 36(1): 93-111. DOI: 10.1002/uog.7622.
[20]
Turan S, Turan OM, Berg C, et al. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 30(5): 750-756. DOI: 10.1002/uog.4101.
[21]
Thapar A, Cooper M, Rutter M. Neurodevelopmental disorders[J]. Lancet Psychiatry, 2017, 4(4): 339-346. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30376-5.
[1] 戴飞, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声定量多参数对主动脉缩窄胎儿心脏结构及功能的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[2] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[3] 杜祖升, 赵博文, 张帧, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺. 应用二维斑点追踪成像技术评估孕周及心尖方向对中晚孕期正常胎儿左心房应变的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 843-851.
[4] 张商迪, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺, 陈阳, 袁华, 陈燕. 中晚孕期胎儿心房内径定量评估心房比例失调胎儿心脏畸形的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 785-793.
[5] 王秋莲, 张莹, 李春敏, 徐树明, 张玉奇. 胎儿主动脉弓部梗阻伴发复杂心内畸形的产前超声诊断及漏误诊分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 718-725.
[6] 顾莉莉, 姜凡. 安徽省超声产前筛查切面图像质量现状调查情况及分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 671-674.
[7] 曾晴, 文华轩, 袁鹰, 廖伊梅, 秦越, 罗丹丹, 梁美玲, 李胜利. 经腹二维超声评价胎儿大脑外侧裂的新参数——外侧裂平台角度[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 454-459.
[8] 王水清, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 马明明, 狄敏. 16~40周正常胎儿左心房后间隙指数及其Z评分的定量研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 460-469.
[9] 王濛, 王華麟, 王鉴, 孙锟. 先天性心脏病宫内诊疗现状与展望[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 481-485.
[10] 钱警语, 郑明明. 《2024意大利妇产科学会非侵入性和侵入性产前诊断指南》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
[11] 黄蓉, 梁自毓, 祁文瑾. NLRP3炎症小体在胎膜早破孕妇血清中的表达及其意义[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 540-548.
[12] 何霞, 黄蓉, 祁文瑾. 胎膜早破孕妇胎盘与胎膜菌群丰度的高通量测序研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 549-555.
[13] 谢江燕, 王亚菲, 贺芳. 妊娠合并血栓性血小板减少性紫癜2例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 556-563.
[14] 谢井伟, 王森, 王非, 郭永坤. STA-MCA血管搭桥术治疗烟雾病[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 318-320.
[15] 鲁珊, 姚蕴珊, 廖色坭, 陈子恩, 张一剑, 蓝健皓, 魏薇, 刘艳杨, 陈艳红, 陈敦金. 妊娠合并急性阑尾炎100例临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 214-219.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?