切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 646 -654. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.06.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

早孕期筛查唐氏综合征或18-三体综合征不同风险值与胎儿染色体异常及妊娠结局分析
王宏1, 段纯1, 袁晖2, 吴晓霞2, 谢建生2,(), 赵光临3   
  1. 1. 南方医科大学附属深圳市妇幼保健院检验科 518028
    2. 南方医科大学附属深圳市妇幼保健院产前诊断中心 518028
    3. 南方医科大学附属深圳市妇幼保健院妇幼信息科 518028
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-13 修回日期:2019-11-12 出版日期:2019-12-01
  • 通信作者: 谢建生

Analysis of different risk values of Down syndrome or 18 trisomy syndrome in the first trimester screening and fetal chromosomal abnormalities and pregnancy outcomes of pregnant women

Hong Wang1, Chun Duan1, Hui Yuan2, Xiaoxia Wu2, Jiansheng Xie2,(), Guanglin Zhao3   

  1. 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518028, Guangdong Province, China
    2. Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518028, Guangdong Province, China
    3. Department of Information, Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518028, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2019-06-13 Revised:2019-11-12 Published:2019-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Jiansheng Xie
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xie Jiansheng, Email:
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(31471204)
引用本文:

王宏, 段纯, 袁晖, 吴晓霞, 谢建生, 赵光临. 早孕期筛查唐氏综合征或18-三体综合征不同风险值与胎儿染色体异常及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(06): 646-654.

Hong Wang, Chun Duan, Hui Yuan, Xiaoxia Wu, Jiansheng Xie, Guanglin Zhao. Analysis of different risk values of Down syndrome or 18 trisomy syndrome in the first trimester screening and fetal chromosomal abnormalities and pregnancy outcomes of pregnant women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 15(06): 646-654.

目的

探讨孕妇早孕期筛查结果为唐氏综合征(DS)或18-三体综合征高风险、临界风险与低风险的胎儿染色体异常率及其妊娠结局。

方法

选择2017年1至12月,于南方医科大学附属深圳市妇幼保健院接受早孕期筛查,并获得明确妊娠结局的14 598例单胎孕妇为研究对象。对其妊娠结局随访,分别采取查询本院产前诊断中心、深圳市妇幼保健信息管理系统或电话随访受试者本人的方式完成,对其随访截止时间设定为活产儿1岁,或胎儿自然流产/死胎发生时。其中,接受早孕期血清学筛查孕妇为6 825例,接受早孕期血清学联合胎儿超声颈项透明层(NT)筛查为7 773例;早孕期筛查结果为DS或18-三体综合征高风险、临界风险、低风险的孕妇分别为1 082例、1 903例及11 613例;高龄(预产年龄≥35岁)孕妇为2 223例(15.23%,2 223/14 598)。采用回顾性研究方法,收集所有孕妇早孕期筛查与胎儿染色体异常结果及其妊娠结局。对于预产年龄<35岁与≥35岁孕妇的胎儿DS、18-三体综合征筛查阳性率(SPR)比较,早孕期筛查结果为胎儿DS或18-三体综合征高风险、临界风险、低风险的胎儿染色体异常率及不良妊娠结局发生率比较,采用χ2检验。本研究遵循的程序符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》要求。

结果

①高龄孕妇的胎儿DS与18-三体综合征SPR分别为22.22%(494/2 223)与1.30%(29/2 223),均显著高于预产年龄<35岁孕妇的4.00%(495/12 375)与0.52%(649/12 375),并且差异均有统计学意义(χ2=990.737、18.456,P<0.001)。②本研究14 598例孕妇中,经产前诊断确诊为胎儿染色体异常者为49例,经新生儿外周血核型分析确诊为胎儿染色体异常者为2例,胎儿染色体异常率为0.35%(51/14 598)。51例异常染色体胎儿中,26例为DS胎儿。其中,早孕期筛查结果为胎儿DS高风险为22例,临界风险及低风险为4例,DS胎儿检出率为84.62%(22/26),胎儿DS发生率为0.18%(26/14 598);胎儿18-三体综合征为3例,早孕期筛查结果均为胎儿18-三体综合征高风险,胎儿18-三体综合征检出率为100.00%(3/3);胎儿性染色体异常为15例,胎儿性染色体异常率为0.10%(15/14 598);2例为13-三体综合征胎儿,5例为染色体结构异常胎儿。③早孕期筛查结果为胎儿DS或18-三体综合征高风险、临界风险、低风险孕妇中,确诊胎儿为染色体异常者分别为31例、7例及13例,胎儿染色体异常率分别为2.87%(31/1 082)、0.37%(7/1 903)及0.11%(13/11 613)。在胎儿DS或18-三体综合征临界风险和低风险孕妇中,确诊胎儿为DS或18-三体综合征者共计20例,其中19例经产前诊断确诊,包括17例无创产前检测(NIPT)结果显示异常、1例孕妇为高龄及1例为胎儿NT增厚;1例为产后确诊胎儿染色体异常。④排除51例胎儿染色体异常的孕妇之外,其余14 547例孕妇中,早孕期筛查结果为高风险孕妇,因胎儿超声结构异常而终止妊娠、自然流产/死胎、早产、伴出生缺陷等不良妊娠结局发生率为9.32%(98/1 051),临界风险孕妇为5.17%(98/1 896),低风险孕妇为4.19%(486/11 600),3者比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=57.989,P<0.001)。

结论

早孕期筛查对DS和18-三体综合征胎儿具有较高检出率,但是不能检出所有的染色体异常胎儿。在早孕期筛查结果为临界风险、低风险孕妇中,其胎儿仍然存在染色体异常可能,对此类孕妇进一步进行NIPT,有助于检出染色体异常胎儿。早孕期筛查结果为高风险孕妇,除胎儿染色体异常率高外,因胎儿超声结构异常而终止妊娠、自然流产/死胎、早产、伴出生缺陷等不良妊娠结局发生率亦较高。

Objective

To explore high risk, intermediate risk and low risk values of Down syndrome (DS) or 18 trisomy syndrome in first trimester screening in pregnant women and their fetal chromosomal abnormalities and pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

From January to December 2017, a total of 14 598 singleton pregnant women who received first trimester screening in Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University and with pregnancy outcomes were selected as research subjects. Their pregnancy outcomes were followed-up by searching information from Prenatal Diagnosis Center of our hospital or Shenzhen Maternal and Child Health Information Management System or telephoning the research subjects. Follow-up of pregnancy outcomes for live births was conducted from 1-12 months after birth or the occurrence of spontaneous abortion/stillbirth or termination of pregnancy. Among them, 6 825 cases received first trimester serological screening only, and 7 773 cases received first trimester serological screening combined with fetal ultrasound nuchal translucency (NT) detection. And 1 082 cases were with high risk of fetal DS or 18 trisomy syndrome in first trimester screening, 1 903 cases were with intermediate risk, and 11 613 cases were with low risk. There were 2 223 cases of pregnant women with advanced age (≥35-year old at parturition), accounting for 15.23% (2 223/14 598). Retrospective research method was used to collect first trimester screening results, fetal chromosomal abnormalities and pregnancy outcomes of all pregnant women. Chi-square test was used to compare screening positive rate (SPR) of fetal DS and 18 trisomy syndrome in pregnant women of different ages (<35-year old and ≥35-year old at parturition), rate of fetal chromosomal abnormalities and incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with high risk, intermediate risk and low risk of fetal DS or 18 trisomy syndrome in first trimester screening. The procedures in this study were in line with the requirements of World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013.

Results

①The SPR of fetal DS and 18 trisomy syndrome of first trimester pregnant women with advanced maternal age were 22.22% (494/2 223) and 1.30% (29/2 223), respectively, which were statistically higher than those 4.00% (495/12 375) and 0.52% (649/12 375) of pregnant women <35-year old, and both the differences were statistically significant (χ2=990.737, 18.456; P<0.001). ②There were 51 cases of fetal chromosomal abnormalities among 14 598 cases of pregnant women, 49 cases were prenatally diagnosed and 2 cases were postnatally diagnosed by neonate peripheral blood karyotype analysis, and the rate of fetal chromosomal abnormalities was 0.35% (51/14 598). Among the 51 cases of fetal chromosomal abnormalities, 26 cases were DS, and 22 case of them were high-risk of DS in first trimester screening, and 4 cases were intermediate and low risk of DS in first trimester screening, the DS detection rate was 84.62% (22/26), the rate of fetal DS was 0.18% (26/14 598); and 3 cases were 18 trisomy syndrome, all of them were high risk of 18 trisomy syndrome in first trimester screening, the detection rate of 18 trisomy syndrome was 100.00% (3/3); and 15 cases were sex chromosome abnormalities, the rate of sex chromosome abnormalities was 0.10% (15/14 598); 2 cases were 13 trisomy syndrome and 5 cases were structural chromosome abnormalities. ③Among pregnant women with high risk, intermediate risk, and low risk of fetal DS or 18 trisomy syndrome in first trimester screening, 31 cases, 7 cases and 13 cases of fetuses respectively were diagnosed as fetal chromosomal abnormalities, and rate of fetal chromosomal abnormalities of them were 2.87% (31/1 082), 0.37% (7/1 903), and 0.11% (13/11 613), respectively. Among pregnant women with intermediate risk and low risk of fetal DS or 18 trisomy syndrome in first trimester screening, 20 cases were diagnosed as fetal chromosomal abnormalities, 19 cases were prenatally diagnosed, including 17 cases with abnormal results in noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT), 1 cases of advanced age and 1 case of NT thickening; and 1 case was postnatally diagnosed. ④Excluding 51 cases of pregnant women with fetal chromosomal abnormalities, among another 14 547 cases of pregnant women with different risks of first trimester screening, the incidences of adverse pregnancy outcomes including termination of pregnancy due to fetal ultrasound abnormality, spontaneous abortion/stillbirth, premature delivery and birth defects of pregnant women with high risk, intermediate risk and low risk of first trimester screening were 9.32% (98/1 051), 5.17% (98/1 896) and 4.19% (486/11 600), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=57.989, P<0.001).

Conclusions

The detection rates of fetal DS and 18 trisomy syndrome are high in first trimester screening, but not all fetal chromosomal abnormalities can be detected out. In pregnant women with intermediate risk and low risk of fetal DS or 18 trisomy syndrome in first trimester screening, fetal chromosomal abnormalities still may be found among them, and further NIPT can be helpful to detect fetal chromosomal abnormal in those pregnant women. In pregnant women with high risk of fetal DS or 18 trisomy syndrome in first trimester screening, except for high rate of fetal chromosomal abnormalities, the incidences of other adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as termination of pregnancy due to fetal ultrasound abnormality, spontaneous abortion/stillbirth, premature birth, and birth defects are also relatively high.

表1 不同年龄孕妇的胎儿DS和18-三体综合征SPR比较[例数(%)]
表2 14 598例孕妇早孕期筛查结果为DS或18-三体综合征不同风险值的胎儿染色体异常情况
表3 20例孕妇早孕期筛查结果为DS或18-三体综合征临界风险和低风险的胎儿染色体异常情况
孕妇编号(No.) 年龄(岁) 孕龄(周) DS风险值 18-三体综合征 NT厚度(mm) 血清PAPP-A MoM 血清fβ-HCG MoM 产前诊断指征(NIPT结果) 胎儿染色体核型异常情况 妊娠结局
1 31 12+2 1/353 低风险 2.2 0.70 1.11 DS高风险 47,XN+21 终止妊娠
2 42 12+6 1/508 低风险 1.4 0.82 1.45 高龄 47,XXY 终止妊娠
3 28 13+0 1/577 低风险 1.8 2.48 5.38 45,X[4]/46,XY[56] 活产
4 38 12+5 1/583 低风险 1.5 0.69 1.89 性染色体数目增多 47,XXX 终止妊娠
5 34 12+0 1/625 低风险 1.7 0.34 0.58 DS高风险 47,XN+21 终止妊娠
6 41 12+1 1/777 低风险 1.3 0.74 1.08 性染色体数目增多 47,XXY 终止妊娠
7 44 12+1 1/898 低风险 1.40 0.48 性染色体数目增多 47,XXY 终止妊娠
8 28 12+5 1/1 032 低风险 0.37 0.80 性染色体数目减少 45,XO 终止妊娠
9 24 12+1 1/1 152 低风险 0.63 1.51 DS高风险 47,XN+21 终止妊娠
10 30 13+2 1/1 172 低风险 2.0 0.58 1.46 DS高风险 47,XN+21 终止妊娠
11 34 12+5 1/1 818 低风险 1.4 0.64 1.66 性染色体数目增多 47,XXY 终止妊娠
12 28 10+0 1/1 907 低风险 1.16 0.65 性染色体数目增多 47,XXX 活产
13 34 12+6 1/2 095 低风险 0.45 0.42 NT厚度为5.6 mm 47,XN+13 终止妊娠
14 27 11+1 1/2 357 低风险 0.51 0.74 性染色体数目增多 47,XXX 终止妊娠
15 37 13+4 1/3 193 低风险 0.43 1.44 性染色体数目增多 47,XXY 终止妊娠
16 37 11+5 1/8 502 低风险 0.28 0.96 性染色体数目增多 47,XXX 活产
17 31 11+1 1/14 499 低风险 1.03 0.67 性染色体数目增多 47,XXY 终止妊娠
18 31 12+0 1/30 382 低风险 1.2 0.69 0.42 18号染色体微缺失 染色体结构异常 终止妊娠
19 33 11+2 1/14 809 低风险 1.2 0.46 0.42 性染色体数目增多 47,XXY 终止妊娠
20 29 13+5 1/21 157 低风险 0.6 0.63 1.40 性染色体减少 染色体微重复、微缺失 终止妊娠
表4 14 547例孕妇(排除51例胎儿染色体异常孕妇)早孕期筛查结果为DS或18-三体综合征不同风险值的不良妊娠结局比较
[1]
Nicolaides KH, Azar G, Byrne D, et al. Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects in first trimester of pregnancy[J]. BMJ, 1992, 304(6831): 867-869.
[2]
Snijders RJ, Noble P, Sebire N, et al. UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10-14 weeks of gestation. Fetal Medicine Foundation First Trimester Screening Group[J]. Lancet, 1998, 352(9125): 343-346.
[3]
Schaelike M, Kossakiewicz M, Kossakiewicz A, et al. Examination of a first-trimester Down syndrome screening concept on a mix of 11, 107 high-and low-risk patients at a private center for prenatal medicine in Germany[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2009, 144(2): 140-145.
[4]
Morgan S, Delbarre A, Ward P. Impact of introducing a national policy for prenatal Down syndrome screening on the diagnostic invasive procedure rate in England[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 41(5): 526-529.
[5]
谢幸,孔北华,段涛. 妇产科学[M]. 9版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018: 64-65.
[6]
Santorum M, Wright D, Syngelaki A, et al. Accuracy of first-trimester combined test in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 49(6): 714-720.
[7]
许遵鹏,李蓓,廖灿,等. 广州市早孕期产前筛查胎儿染色体异常的结果分析[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志,2014, 31(5): 632-635.
[8]
何天文,陈柯艺,唐斌,等. 20 323例孕早期一站式唐氏筛查结果分析[J]. 国际检验医学杂志,2016, 37(1): 35-36, 39.
[9]
葛婷婷,孙庆梅,吴菊,等. 12 807例孕早期唐氏筛查的临床应用现状分析[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志,2018, 26(6): 54-55.
[10]
何法霖,赵彦,王薇,等. 2014年早孕期母血清产前筛查检验项目室内质控结果调查与分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健杂志,2015, 30(8): 1235-1236.
[11]
郑文吉,陈志央,余颀,等. 早孕期唐氏综合征筛查指标中位数本地化的研究[J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2016, 19(10): 785-788.
[12]
涂新枝,段纯,李玉哲,等. 无创胎儿DNA检测在2 949例传统唐氏筛查临界风险孕妇中的应用[J]. 天津医药杂志,2017, 5(2): 180-183.
[13]
孔京慧,李娴,赵鼎,等. 郑州地区628例先天畸形新生儿的细胞遗传学分析[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志,2018, 35(6): 926-927.
[14]
宋春林,郭晓玲,陈淑芬,等. 无创产前检测在胎儿性染色体检测中的应用价值[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志,2018, 26(5): 36-37.
[15]
罗艳梅,胡华梅,徐聚春,等. 无创产前基因检测在胎儿染色体非整倍体筛查中的应用研究[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2018, 34(6): 464-467.
[16]
Kornman L, Palma-Dias R, Nisbet D, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing for sex chromosome aneuploidy in routine clinical practice[J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2018, 44(2): 85-90.
[17]
Gregg AR, Skotko BG, Benkendorf JL, et al. Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, 2016 update: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics[J]. Genet Med, 2016, 18(10): 1056-1065.?
[18]
苏杭,刘之英,赖怡,等. 高龄孕妇产前诊断结果及其首选无创产前筛查局限性的大样本分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(6): 719-723.
[19]
侯亚萍,杨洁霞,郭芳芳,等. 无创DNA产前检测在胎儿染色体非整倍体疾病筛查中的应用[J]. 检验医学与临床,2018, 15(11): 1542-1544, 1548.
[20]
张敏,梅瑾,张闻,等. 唐氏综合征产前筛查高风险与不良妊娠结局的相关性探讨[J]. 现代实用医学,2016, 28(9): 1206-1208.
[21]
潘敏,孙茜,陈儒香,等. 唐氏综合征产前筛查结果为极高风险孕妇的妊娠结局分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(2): 157-163.
[1] 武玺宁, 欧阳云淑, 张一休, 孟华, 徐钟慧, 张培培, 吕珂. 胎儿心脏超声检查在抗SSA/Ro-SSB/La抗体阳性妊娠管理中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1056-1060.
[2] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[3] 赵红娟, 赵博文, 潘美, 纪园园, 彭晓慧, 陈冉. 应用多普勒超声定量分析正常中晚孕期胎儿左心室收缩舒张时间指数[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 951-958.
[4] 张璟璟, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 毛彦恺, 潘陈可, 朱玲艳, 朱琳琳, 蓝秋晔. 胎儿超声心动图测量McGoon指数在评价胎儿肺血管发育中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 860-865.
[5] 旺久, 陈军, 朱霞, 米玛央金, 赵胜, 陈欣林, 李建华, 王双. 山南市妇幼保健院开展胎儿系统超声筛查的效果分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 728-733.
[6] 徐鹏, 李军, 高巍伦, 王峥, 庞珅, 李春妮, 朱霆. 快速旋转扫查法在胎儿超声心动图检查中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 761-766.
[7] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 沈玉琴, 李炎菲海, 王海蕊, 范思涵, 纪学芹. 胎儿心脏定量分析技术对正常胎儿心脏形态及收缩功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 598-604.
[8] 罗刚, 泮思林, 陈涛涛, 许茜, 纪志娴, 王思宝, 孙玲玉. 超声心动图在胎儿心脏介入治疗室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 605-609.
[9] 黄佳, 石华, 张玉国, 胡佳琪, 陈茜. 胎儿左头臂静脉正常与异常超声图像特征及其临床意义[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 610-617.
[10] 袁泽, 庄丽. 超声检测胎儿脐动脉和大脑中动脉血流对胎儿宫内窘迫的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 618-621.
[11] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[12] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[13] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[14] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[15] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
阅读次数
全文


摘要