切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 354 -357. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2017.03.020

所属专题: 文献

论著

中医药治疗儿童手足口病的临床疗效
李莎1,(), 张伟1   
  1. 1. 610091 成都市妇女儿童中心医院儿科
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-12 修回日期:2017-05-25 出版日期:2017-06-01
  • 通信作者: 李莎

Curative effect of herb therapy on hand, foot and mouth disease in children

Sha Li1,(), Wei Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Chengdu Women & Children′s Central Hospital, Chengdu 610091, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2017-04-12 Revised:2017-05-25 Published:2017-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Sha Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Sha, Email:
引用本文:

李莎, 张伟. 中医药治疗儿童手足口病的临床疗效[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 13(03): 354-357.

Sha Li, Wei Zhang. Curative effect of herb therapy on hand, foot and mouth disease in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2017, 13(03): 354-357.

目的

探讨中医药金莲清热泡腾片治疗儿童手足口病(HFMD)的临床疗效及可能机制。

方法

选择2014年1月至2017年2月,在成都市妇女儿童中心医院临床诊断为普通型HFMD的790例门诊患儿为研究对象。采用随机数字表法,将790例患儿随机分为金莲清热泡腾片组(n=390)与柴黄冲剂组(n=400)。前者采用金莲清热泡腾片治疗,后者采用柴黄冲剂治疗,并均予以退热、抗感染等对症、支持治疗,进展为重症HFMD的患儿转入本院住院部治疗。2组患儿门诊治疗疗程均为5 d,治疗结束后均随访3 d。统计学比较2组患儿治愈率、重症HFMD发生率及临床症状消退所需时间等。2组患儿年龄、性别构成比等基本临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结果

①金莲清热泡腾片组与柴黄冲剂组患儿发热率分别为33.8%(132/390)与28.2%(113/400),二者比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.890,P=0.089)。2组继发细菌感染率分别为18.5%(72/390)与17.0%(68/400),二者比较,差异亦无统计学意义(χ2=0.289,P=0.591)。②金莲清热泡腾片组重症HFMD发生率为0.5%(2/390),较柴黄冲剂组的2.3%(9/400)低,并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.340,P=0.037)。金莲清热泡腾片组治疗3 d和5 d后的治愈率,均分别较柴黄冲剂组高,而下呼吸道感染率,以及体温恢复正常、口腔疱疹愈合及皮疹消退时间,均分别较柴黄冲剂组低或短,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

金莲清热泡腾片治疗普通型HFMD,较柴黄冲剂治疗疗效更佳,重症HFMD发生率更低。

Objective

To explore the clinical therapeutic efficacy and possible mechanism of Jinlianqingre effervescent tablets on children with hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD).

Methods

A total of 790 outpatient children with common type HFMD who came to Chengdu Women & Children′s Central Hospital from January 2014 to February 2017, were chosen as study subjects. Random digits table was used to divide the 790 cases into Jinlianqingre effervescent tablets group (n=390) and Chaihuang granules group (n=400). The former was treated with Jinlianqingre effervescent tablets, and the latter was treated with Chaihuang granules, meanwhile, the two groups were given symptomatic and supportive treatments, such as defervesce and anti-infection, and so on. Progressive severe HFDM cases were admitted in inpatient department. All children were treated for 5 d in the outpatient department, and followed up for 3 d. The cure rates, incidence rates of severe HFDM cases and the time for clinical symptoms regression were compared between two groups statistically. There were no significant differences between two groups in general clinic data, such as age and gender constituent ratio.

Results

①The fever rates of Jinlianqingre effervescent tablets group and Chaihuang granules group were 33.8% (132/390) and 28.2% (113/400) respectively, and there was no significant difference between two groups (χ2=2.890, P=0.089). The secondary bacterial infection rates of two groups were 18.5% (72/390) and 17.0% (68/400) respectively, and there was no significant difference between two groups (χ2=0.289, P=0.591). ②The incidence rate of severe HFDM cases in Jinlianqingre effervescent tablets group was 0.5% (2/390), it was lower than that of Chaihuang granules group, which was 2.3% (9/400), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.340, P=0.037). The 3 d and 5 d cure rates of Jinlianqingre effervescent tablets group were both higher than those of Chaihuang granules group, while the lower respiratory tract infection rate, as well as temperatures normalization time, herpes of mouth healing time and deflorescence time were lower or shorter than those of Chaihuang granules group, and all the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The therapeutic effect of Jinlianqingre effervescent tablets in chidren with common type HFMD is better than that of Chaihuang granules, and the incidence of severe HFMD cases is lower.

表1 2组普通型手足口病患儿中医药治疗效果比较
[1]
中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 手足口病诊疗指南(2010年版)[EB/OL]. (2010-04-20).[2017-04-15].

URL    
[2]
刘丽,李芹. 中医药治疗手足口病临床研究进展[J]. 亚太传统医药,2015, 11(9): 47-49.
[3]
郭晓荣,郁会莲,邱琳,等. 2010年陕西省手足口病报告发病高峰期重症及死亡病例情况分析[J]. 疾病监测,2011, 26(8): 608-610.
[4]
莫毅,谭毅,莫建军,等. 2010年广西壮族自治区手足口病流行病学分析[J]. 疾病监测,2011, 26(8): 611-613.
[5]
李润青,何菡,赵秀英,等. 1 073例儿童手足口病病原学检测结果及临床特征分析[J]. 北京医学,2011, 33(9): 709-712.
[6]
张国梁,魏超宇. 中药治疗手足口病的Meta分析[J]. 世界中西医结合杂志,2014, 9(2): 122-125, 129.
[7]
田继萍. 利巴韦林气雾剂联合蓝芩口服液治疗手足口病疗效观察[J]. 河北医药,2014, 36(4): 572-573.
[8]
刘清泉,张伟,康锦伟,等. 金莲清热泡腾片配合抗病毒药物治疗小儿手足口病轻症的临床观察[J]. 北京中医药,2009, 28(3): 221-222.
[9]
李超贤,赵伟. 金莲清热泡腾片联合阿糖腺苷注射液治疗手足口病100例[J]. 中医研究,2013, 26(7): 28-29.
[10]
曾庆生,林奕波,杜天仁,等. 重症手足口病患儿预后及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国医学创新,2014, 11(13): 58-60.
[11]
王志宏. 康复新液联合利巴韦林治疗小儿手足口病的疗效观察[J]. 中国医学创新,2012, 9(17): 36-37.
[12]
中华人民共和国国家中医药管理局. 中医药治疗手足口病临床技术指南(2012年版) [J]. 浙江中西医结合杂志,2012, 22(9): 750.
[13]
陶红,林庆锋,张韬,等. 治疗手足口病中药的灰关联分析[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志,2012, 18(4): 282-284.
[14]
刘忠琼. 热毒宁与利巴韦林联合应用治疗小儿手足口病的临床优势分析[J]. 中国医学创新,2013, 10(31): 134-135.
[15]
周文亮,邢秀伟. 216例重症手足口病高危特征的临床分析[J]. 中国医学创新,2013, 10(6): 119-120.
[16]
李文莉,周伟,胡金平,等. 开喉剑喷雾剂联合蒲地蓝消炎口服液治疗普通型手足口病的疗效观察[J]. 中国医学创新,2013, 10(29): 56-57.
[17]
何善辉. 金莲清热泡腾片联合利巴韦林治疗手足口病的疗效分析[J]. 华西医学,2012, 27(10): 1513-1514.
[18]
郝娟芝,樊建淑,刘霞,等. 金莲清热泡腾片治疗手足口病疗效观察[J]. 中国现代药物应用,2015, 9(5): 146-147.
[19]
李海燕,安慧平. 重症手足口病的临床表现和治疗[J]. 现代医药卫生,2011, 27(3): 374-376.
[20]
杨冬冬,祐红瑞. 739例手足口病临床分析[J]. 河南医学研究,2017, 26(1): 50-51.
[21]
Li X, Zhang C, Shi Q, et al. Improving the efficacy of conventional therapy by adding andrographolide sulfonate in the treatment of severe hand, foot, and mouth disease: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2013: 316250.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[7] 李维, 莫俊俏. 儿童呼吸道耐药流感嗜血杆菌基因型鉴定及耐药分析对抗菌药物治疗选择的意义[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 315-323.
[8] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[9] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
[10] 闵筱兰, 周洁超, 陈振添. 健康管理联合心理干预用于腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术患儿术后效果观察[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 657-661.
[11] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[12] 冷昭富, 汪永新. 儿童去骨瓣减压术后颅骨成形术的研究进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 313-317.
[13] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[14] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[15] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要