切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (05) : 640 -643. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2015.05.019

所属专题: 文献

论著

自由体位分娩对母婴围生期结局的影响
李红雨1, 常青1,*,*(), 王丹1   
  1. 1. 400038 重庆,第三军医大学第一附属医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-06 修回日期:2015-08-16 出版日期:2015-10-01
  • 通信作者: 常青

Effects of free position during delivery on maternal and perinatal outcomes

Hongyu Li1, Qing Chang1(), Dan Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
  • Received:2015-05-06 Revised:2015-08-16 Published:2015-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Qing Chang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chang Qing, Email:
引用本文:

李红雨, 常青, 王丹. 自由体位分娩对母婴围生期结局的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(05): 640-643.

Hongyu Li, Qing Chang, Dan Wang. Effects of free position during delivery on maternal and perinatal outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2015, 11(05): 640-643.

目的

探讨自由体位分娩对母婴围生期结局的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2013年5月至2014年5月于第三军医大学第一附属医院产科住院分娩的960例低危、足月初产妇的临床病历资料为研究对象。按照随机数字表法,将其分为研究组(n=480)和对照组(n=480)。研究组产妇于第一产程取自由体位待产,第二产程取胱截石位加床头抬高(30°~45°)分娩。对照组产妇第一产程取仰卧位或侧卧位待产,第二产程取膀胱截石位分娩。比较两组产妇的分娩方式、会阴侧切率、各产程持续时间、经阴道分娩新生儿生后1,5 min Apgar评分和经阴道分娩新生儿生后1,5 min窒息发生率。本研究遵循的程序符合第三军医大学第一附属医院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,征得受试对象本人及其家属的同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①研究组产妇的阴道顺产率高于对照组(87.9% vs 59.2%),但其阴道助产率和剖宫产率均低于对照组(1.2% vs 7.5%,10.8% vs 33.3%),两组比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=10.26,5.11,8.67;P<0.05)。②研究组产妇会阴侧切率为15.0%(64/428),对照组为41.6%(133/320),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=893,P<0.01)。③研究组阴道分娩产妇的第一产程时间、第二产程时间及总产程时间均短于对照组[(488.3±147.8) min vs (643.6±133.6) min, (30.5±16.6) min vs (58.6±13.2) min, (536.7±159.4) min vs (662.6±161.5) min],并且差异均有统计学意义(t=4.73,3.62,3.87;P<0.05)。④研究组新生儿生后1 min和5 min窒息发生率均低于对照组,并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.43,5.07;P<0.05)。研究组新生儿生后1 min和5 min Apgar评分均高于对照组,并且差异均无统计学意义(t=0.48, 0.64;P>0.05)。

结论

自由体位分娩可促进阴道分娩,减少医疗干预,利于母婴健康。

Objective

To investigate the effects of free position during delivery on maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Methods

Clinical data of 960 cases of low risk primiparas delivering in our labor room from May 2013 to May 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. All primiparas were randomly divided into study group (n=480) and control group (n=480). Primiparas in the study group were in free position during the first stage of labor and in bladder lithotomy position with semireclining position during the second stage of labor. Primiparas in the control group were in supine position or lateral position during the first stage of labor and in bladder lithotomy position during the second stage of labor. Delivery mode, episiotomy rate, time of birth process, Apgar score of newborns and incidence of neonatal asphyxia at 1, 5 min after birth were compared. This study followed the ethical standards set out by the human trial committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Medical University. It was approved by the committee, with the consent of the subjects themselves and their families. Meanwhile, a clinical research informed consent was signed between us.

Results

① Rate of vaginal delivery was higher in study group than that in control group (87.9% vs 59.2%), and episiotomy rate and cesarean section rate were lower in study group than those in control group (1.2% vs 7.5%, 10.8% vs 33.3%). There were statistically significant difference in these indexes between two groups (χ2=10.26, 5.11, 8.67; P<0.05). ② Episiotomy rate was 15.0% (64/428) in study group and 41.6% (133/320) in control group with statistically significant difference (χ2=893, P<0.01). ③ Duration of the first stage of labor, second stage of labor and total stage of labor were shorter in study group than those in control group with statistically significant difference [(488.3±147.8) min vs (643.6±133.6) min, (30.5±16.6) min vs (58.6±13.2) min, (536.7±159.4) min vs (662.6±161.5) min, t=4.73, 3.62, 3.87; P<0.05]. ④ Incidence of neonatal asphyxia at 1, 5 min after birth were lower in study group than those in control group with statistically significant difference (χ2=6.43, 5.07; P<0.05). Apgar score of newborns at 1, 5 min after birth were higher in study group than those in control group without statistically significant difference (t=0.48, 0.64; P>0.05).

Conclusions

Free position could promote natural delivery, reduce medical intervention and be good for maternal and fetal health.

表1 两组一般情况比较(±s)
表2 两组产妇分娩方式比较[例数(%)]
表3 两组阴道分娩产妇各产程持续时间比较(min,±s)
表4 两组新生儿的分娩结局比较(±s)
[1]
张凤玲.自由分娩体位研究进展[J].护理学杂志,2011,26(24):84-86.
[2]
李粉英,黄文玲,李小娟.体位管理对孕产妇自然分娩的影响[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2011, 32(9):1487-1488.
[3]
叶小丽.探讨自由体位分娩模式[J]. 临床医药文献杂志:电子版,2015, 6(12):2455-2456.
[4]
陈伟霞.自由体位分娩护理体会[J]. 吉林医学,2015,36(6):1217-1218.
[5]
潘敏,雪丽霜.体位干预及采用分娩辅助设施对产程及分娩结局影响的研究进展[J].中国妇幼保健,2012,27(18):2875.
[6]
覃秀珠,沈岩金.自由体位对分娩影响的临床观察[J].中国妇幼保健,2014, 29(12):1842-1844.
[7]
黄华.自由体位分娩在产程中的综合效果分析[J].中国实用医药,2014, 9(7):128.
[8]
Zwelling E. Overcoming the challenges: maternal movement and positioning to facilitate labor progress [J]. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs, 2010, 35(2):72-78.
[9]
周丽端.产程体位管理对分娩影响的临床观察[J].全科护理,2008, 6(12):3320-3321.
[10]
李慧霞,卢金香,孙宝丽.实施分娩期体位护理的临床体会[J].解放军护理杂志,2007, 24(5):32-33.
[11]
袁单香,黄燕艳. 产妇分娩在第一产程中采取自由体位对促进自然分娩的作用[J]. 哈尔滨医药,2014,34(4):298-299.
[12]
黄雪霞,郑迅风,黄晓玲,等. 第一产程自由体位与常规卧位对分娩结局的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2015, 30(21):3573-3574.
[13]
李妙,叶雪健. 第一产程自由体位对分娩的影响[J].当代医学,2012, 12(35):104-105.
[14]
涂伟妹,刘佩蓉,郭爱英,等. 初产妇在第二产程中采取自由体位联合无保护会阴接生对分娩效果的影响[J].实用临床医学,2014,15(8):68-69.
[15]
陈娟英,马麟娟. 不同分娩体位对产程及围生结局影响的研究[J]. 护理与康复,2010,9(6):465-467.
[16]
毛雁冰,陈小霞,陈丽颜,等.自由体位对促进自然分娩的临床研究[J]. 中华护理教育,2015,12(4):293-295.
[17]
丁依玲,黄丽霞.分娩期的体位[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005, 21(5):259-260.
[18]
黄奕,陈利敏,林意. 自由体位分娩对自然分娩率和剖宫产率影响的临床观察[J]. 生殖医学杂志,2015,24(1):37-40.
[19]
曾彩贤,何倩佞. 自由体位分娩对促进自然分娩的影响分析[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2015,3(9):1372-1373.
[20]
李静,马绮梨,陈瑞香,等.不同待产体位对足月头位衔接的胎膜早破孕妇分娩结局的影响[J].中国循证医学杂志,2010,10(12):1415-1418.
[1] 陈美仁, 戴逸骅, 张茹, 戴英波. "蛙泳"俯卧位在经皮肾镜术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 581-586.
[2] 余俊豪, 麻立. 经腹全腹腔镜上尿路尿路上皮癌根治术在临床中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 529-532.
[3] 钟文, 曾国华. 2021年经皮肾镜欧洲泌尿外科学会尿石症分会与国际尿石症联盟联合专家共识解读[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 193-197.
[4] 王彦刚, 宋培星, 邢德福, 李亮亮, 吴亚蒙, 董安涛, 黄振宇, 叶元平. 俯卧"大"字位在双镜联合一期治疗复杂性肾结石中的效果分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 294-298.
[5] 夏玥, 向承红. 马镫型体位架在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术患者的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 485-487.
[6] 王娜, 蔡菲妃, 鲍家栋, 郑亚琴, 兰庆龄. 体位对儿童腹股沟斜疝腹腔镜术后麻醉复苏及气道管理的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 70-73.
[7] 林湃, 林雁朝, 黄泽嫦. 彩色多普勒超声检查中联合高低频探头、双体位扫查对腹股沟疝诊断准确性的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 372-374.
[8] 黄志兵, 周军, 李东春, 王林娟, 陈萍, 周一兵. 不同固定方式对不同解剖部位肺癌放疗摆位误差分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(06): 817-819.
[9] 姜世洲, 王举. 腹腔镜下手视野显露现存问题及策略[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(04): 254-256.
[10] 潘华峰, 刘江, 成汇, 王海锋, 王刚, 龚冠闻, 柳欣欣, 江志伟. 折刀位对低位直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术预后的影响[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(06): 482-488.
[11] 许馨月, 陈涛, 苏玉婷, 张作明. 青少年近视眼预防与控制技术研究的新进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(03): 173-177.
[12] 欧阳平, 沈凌庆. 自由体位联合无会阴保护技术对初产妇自我效能感及分娩体验的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 231-235.
[13] 许少睿, 孔杰, 苏浩波, 周陈瑶, 尚金林. 上肢体位对上肢静脉DSA影像显示的影响[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 257-261.
[14] 王盈盈, 刘晓冰, 张启迪, 杜健, 张波. 标准体位图联合口诀宣教法对提高内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术体位摆放效果的影响[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2022, 09(02): 95-99.
[15] 郑玲燕, 杨奕, 钟沈菁, 陈月华, 张焕青, 马敬, 俞蔚. 运动康复对老年人体位性低血压的干预效果[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2022, 09(03): 21-24.
阅读次数
全文


摘要