切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (4) : 502 -506. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2015.04.014

所属专题: 文献

论著

0~6岁孤立性侧脑室扩张患儿的丹佛发育筛查结果分析
张凡勇, 朱梁喜*(), 王艳萍, 满冬梅, 田丽娟, 林鹏   
  1. 272000 济宁医学院附属医院
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-05 修回日期:2015-06-25 出版日期:2015-08-01
  • 通信作者: 朱梁喜

Analysis of 0-6 year-old children with isolated ventriculomegaly by Denver development screening test

Fanyong Zhang, Liangxi Zhu*(), Yanping Wang, Dongmei Man, Lijuan Tian, Peng Lin   

  1. Department of Obstetrics, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical College, Jining 272000, Shandong Province, China
  • Received:2015-06-05 Revised:2015-06-25 Published:2015-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Liangxi Zhu
引用本文:

张凡勇, 朱梁喜, 王艳萍, 满冬梅, 田丽娟, 林鹏. 0~6岁孤立性侧脑室扩张患儿的丹佛发育筛查结果分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(4): 502-506.

Fanyong Zhang, Liangxi Zhu, Yanping Wang, Dongmei Man, Lijuan Tian, Peng Lin. Analysis of 0-6 year-old children with isolated ventriculomegaly by Denver development screening test[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2015, 11(4): 502-506.

目的

通过丹佛发育筛查(DDST)分析不同程度及宫内转归类型的孤立性侧脑室扩张(IV)患儿生后0~6岁的智能发育情况。

方法

选择2007年1月1日至2013年1月1日于济宁医学院附属医院就诊的186例IV患儿为研究对象,并纳入研究组(n=186),再根据IV诊断标准将其进一步分为轻度扩张型IV亚组(n=159)、中度扩张型IV亚组(n=18)和重度扩张型IV亚组(n=9)。选择同期于本院行常规体检的200例正常婴幼儿为对照组(n=200)。两组儿童在排除影响发育的高危因素后,均进行DDST,将不同程度及宫内转归类型的研究组患儿分别与对照组儿童进行比较,并研究DDST结果可疑或异常发生率与患儿年龄的关系。

结果

①研究组DDST结果示异常和可疑的患儿分别为8例(4.3%)和16例(8.6%),对照组分别为0和4例(0.2%),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=95.69,P<0.05)。②轻度扩张IV亚组的进展型、中度扩张IV亚组的进展型和稳定型、重度扩张IV亚组的3种类型患儿DDST结果分别与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=15.99,20.61,35.16, 27.56, 14.41,9.35;P<0.05)。③研究组DDST结果示异常和可疑发生率与患儿年龄增加呈正相关关系(χ2=154.30, 159.09;P<0.05)。④研究组DDST结果示异常及可疑的24例患儿中,智能发育障碍表现依次为言语障碍(54.2%)、粗大运动发育障碍(41.6%)、精细动作发育障碍(33.3%)和个人与社会(16.7%)。

结论

轻度扩张IV的进展型、中度扩张IV的进展型和稳定型、重度扩张IV的3种类型均可能导致IV患儿智能发育障碍,并且患儿智能发育障碍发生率可随其年龄增加而增高。对于早期未发现异常的IV高危儿应重视远期随访,尤其注意其言语和运动能发育情况。

Objective

To investigate the intelligential development of 0-6 year-old children with different degrees and prognosis of isolated ventriculomegaly(IV) by Denver development screening test (DDST).

Methods

From 1st January 2007 to 1st January 2013, a total of 186 children with IV were selected as research group(n=186) in Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical College. According to IV diagnostic criteria, they were further divided into mild IV subgroup (n=159), moderate IV subgroup (n=18) and severe IV subgroup (n=9).Meanwhile 200 normal children at the same hospital were chosen as the control group(n=200). The DDST results were compared between every subgroup and control group, respectively. And the relationship between abnormal and suspicious DDST results of children with IV and their age were observed.

Results

①The DDST results showed that there were 8 abnormal cases (4.3%) and 16 suspicious cases (8.6%) in research group, 0 abnormal case and 4 suspicious cases (0.2%) in control group, and the difference had statistical significance between two groups(χ2=95.69, P<0.05).②The results of progressive type of mild IV subgroup, progressive and stable types of moderate IV subgroup and the three types of severe IV subgroup were respectively compared with the control group and all the differences were significant (χ2=15.99, 20.61, 35.16, 27.56, 14.41, 9.35; P<0.05). ③The incidence rates of abnormal and suspicious DDST results in research group were significantly correlated with their age(χ2=154.30, 159.09; P<0.05). ④ The intelligent developmental disorders of 24 children with abnormal and suspicious DDST results were as follow: speech disorder (54.2%), large motor development disorder (41.6%), fine movement disorder (33.3%) and personal and social disorder (16.7%).

Conclusions

The progressive type of mild IV, progressive and stable types of moderate dilatation, three types of severe dilatation, can lead to mental retardation. The proportion of mental retardation increases along with IV patients' age. Infants with high risk who are not found abnormal early need long-term follow-up, especially in the aspect of words and movement ability.

表1 两组DDST结果比较[例数(%)]
表2 轻度扩张型IV亚组各类型DDST结果与对照组比较[例数(%)]
表3 中度扩张型IV亚组各类型DDST结果与对照组比较[例数(%)]
表4 重度扩张型IV亚组各类型DDST结果与对照组比较[例数(%)]
表5 DDST结果异常及可疑的患儿与年龄的关系[例数(%)]
[1]
李影,李玉琴,岳凌云.116例高危儿DDST筛查结果分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健200722(10):59.
[2]
孙越,陈涛涛,张战红.胎儿侧脑室扩张妊娠中晚期转归及预后的相关性分析[J].中国产前诊断杂志:电子版20113(1):17–20.
[3]
宋杰,朱月姝.小儿智能发育检查[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1981: 142–144.
[4]
Madazli R, Sal V, Erenel H, et al. Characteristics and outcome of 102 fetuses with fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly: experience of a university hospital in Turkey[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2011, 31(2):142–145.
[5]
Kutuk MS, Ozgun MT, Uludag S, et al. Postnatal outcome of isolated, nonprogressive, mild borderline fetal ventriculomegaly[J].Childs Nerv Syst, 2013, 29(5):803–808.
[6]
Breeze AC, Alexander PM, Murdoch EM, et al. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in severe fetal ventriculomegaly[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2007, 27(2):124–129.
[7]
Pagani G, Thilaganathan B, Prefumo F. Neurodevelopmental outcome in isolated mild fetal ventriculomegaly: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2014, 44(3):254–260.
[8]
Gomez-Arriaga P, Herraiz I, Puente JM, et al. Mid-term neurodevelopmental outcome in isolated mild ventriculomegaly diagnosed in fetal life[J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2012, 31(1):12–18.
[9]
谢爱兰,赵雅萍,叶袆,等.产前超声诊断轻度胎儿侧脑室扩张的临床意义[J].医学研究杂志201241(2):78–81.
[10]
Weichert J, Hartge D, Krapp M, et al. Prevalence, characteristics and perinatal outcome of fetal ventriculomegaly in 29 000 pregnancies followed at a single institution[J]. Fetal Diagn Ther2010 27(3): 142–148.
[11]
Kutuk MS, Ozgun MT, Uludag S, et al. Postnatal outcome of isolated, nonprogressive,mild borderline fetal ventriculomegaly[J]. Childs Nerv Sys, 2013, 29 (5): 803–808.
[12]
Devaseelan P, Cardwell C, Bell B, et al. Prognosis of isolated mild to moderate fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly: a systematic review[J]. J PerinatMed2010, 38 (4): 401–409.
[13]
Chiu TH, Haliza G, Lin YH,et al. A retrospective study on the course and outcome of fetal ventriculomegaly[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 201453(2):170–177.
[14]
Hidaka N, Ishii K, Kanazawa R,et al. Perinatal characteristics of fetuses with borderline ventriculomegaly detected by routine ultrasonographic screening of low-risk populations[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2014, 40(4):1030–1036.
[15]
Kutuk MS, Ozgun MT, Uludag S,et al. Postnatal outcome of isolated, nonprogressive, mild borderline fetal ventriculomegaly[J]. Childs Nerv Syst201329(5):803–808.
[1] 顾莉莉, 姜凡. 安徽省超声产前筛查切面图像质量现状调查情况及分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 671-674.
[2] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[3] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[4] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[5] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[6] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[7] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[8] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[9] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[10] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[11] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[12] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[13] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[14] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[15] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
阅读次数
全文


摘要