切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (4) : 448 -453. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2015.04.003

所属专题： 文献；

论著

胎羊宫内心脏介入手术中孕羊麻醉方案研究
石晓青, 杨晓玲, 赵亮, 李一飞, 王川, 华益民*(), 周开宇*()   
  1. 610041　成都，四川大学华西第二医院儿科；610041　成都，妇儿疾病与出生缺陷教育部重点实验室
    610041　成都，四川大学华西医院动物实验中心
    610041　成都，四川大学华西第二医院儿科；610041　成都，四川大学华西临床医学院
  • 收稿日期:2015-02-09 修回日期:2015-05-28 出版日期:2015-08-01
  • 通信作者: 华益民, 周开宇

Study on anesthesia protocols for pregnant goat during intrauterine cardiac intervention for the fetus

Xiaoqing Shi, Xiaoling Yang, Liang Zhao, Yifei Li, Chuan Wang, Yimin Hua*(), Kaiyu Zhou*()   

  1. Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China; Key Laboratory of Obstetric & Gynecologic and Pediatric Diseases and Birth Defects of Ministry of Education, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
    Center of Animal Experiment, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
    Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China; West China School of Clinical Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2015-02-09 Revised:2015-05-28 Published:2015-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Yimin Hua, Kaiyu Zhou
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

石晓青, 杨晓玲, 赵亮, 李一飞, 王川, 华益民, 周开宇. 胎羊宫内心脏介入手术中孕羊麻醉方案研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(4): 448-453.

Xiaoqing Shi, Xiaoling Yang, Liang Zhao, Yifei Li, Chuan Wang, Yimin Hua, Kaiyu Zhou. Study on anesthesia protocols for pregnant goat during intrauterine cardiac intervention for the fetus[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2015, 11(4): 448-453.

目的

探讨不同4.0%水合氯醛给药方式的孕羊麻醉方案，在胎羊宫内心脏介入手术中的效果，旨在为胎儿宫内心脏介入手术麻醉方案提供依据。

方法

将40只孕龄为110～127 d的孕羊，按照随机数字表法，将其随机分为滴注组(4.0%水合氯醛持续静脉滴注)及推注组(4.0%水合氯醛负荷给药后间断静脉推注)，每组20只孕羊。观察两组实验孕羊的麻醉显效、复苏时间及麻醉状态能否满足手术要求，记录镇静剂总量，检测术前及术后2个时间点孕羊心率、平均动脉压(MAP)、血pH值、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)、血糖、血乳酸、肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素及皮质醇10项指标水平变化。比较两组孕羊麻醉效果差异，以及在不同组别及不同时间点上述10项指标的水平差异。两组孕羊体质量及孕龄比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结果

①两组孕羊麻醉方案比较，术前肌内注射给药、麻醉给药途径、麻醉维持时间及呼吸道控制情况等方面均相同，两组孕羊麻醉方案均能满足胎羊宫内心脏介入手术要求，但滴注组对麻醉深浅的控制稍难。两组孕羊麻醉最快显效时间及术后开始复苏时间比较，差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。滴注组氯胺酮剂量小于推注组[(116.3±22.5) mg vs (209.3±20.8) mg]，而4.0%水合氯醛及地西泮剂量则大于推注组[(216.7±39.7) mL vs (165.4±19.5) mL，(19.2±3.4) mg vs (10.1±2.9) mg]，孕羊术后完全复苏时间长于推注组[(273.5±26.2) min vs (191.9±33.1) min]，且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②术前两组孕羊上述10项指标水平比较，差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。滴注组孕羊术后血乳酸、肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素及皮质醇含量较术前增高[分别为(6.0±0.8) mmol/L vs (3.7±0.6) mmol/L，(626.3±99.4) ng/L vs (167.3±35.4) ng/L，(6 631.9±753.2) ng/L vs (1 938.5±393.3) ng/L，(509.0±133.6) ng/L vs (219.9±33.3) ng/L]；推注组孕羊术后该4项指标含量较术前增高[分别为(5.0±0.6) mmol/L vs (3.2±0.8) mmol/L，(336.5±58.6) ng/L vs (189.6±32.4) ng/L，(4 063.5±834.7) ng/L vs (2 133.8±323.7) ng/L，(305.9±64.7) ng/L vs (187.3±31.5) ng/L]；术后该4项指标在滴注组均较推注组高[分别为(6.0±0.8) mmol/L vs (5.0±0.6) mmol/L，(626.3±99.4) ng/L vs (336.5±58.6) ng/L，(6 631.9±753.2) ng/L vs (4 063.5±834.7) ng/L，(509.0±133.6) ng/L vs (305.9±64.7) ng/L]，两组上述指标比较，差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。而孕羊心率、MAP、血pH值及PaO2在不同组别或同组内的不同时间点(术前或术后)比较，差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

胎羊宫内心脏介入手术中，4.0%水合氯醛间断推注给药联合使用氯胺酮及地西泮的孕羊麻醉方案，因4.0%水合氯醛及地西泮剂量较小，具有安全性更高、更易于掌握的特点。

关键词: 水合氯醛, 超声检查，介入的, 心脏外科手术, 麻醉, 山羊
Objective

To explore the effects of different 4.0% chloral hydrate administered modes of anesthesia for pregnant goat during fetal goat intrauterine cardiac intervention program to provide basis of anesthesia for fetal intrauterine cardiac intervention program.

Methods

A total of 40 pregnant goats who were being pregnant for 110-127 d were divided into infusion group (4.0% chloral hydrate continuous intravenous infusion) and injection group (4.0% chloral hydrate intermittent intravenous injection after load) in accordance with random digits table, and each group contained 20 pregnant goats.To observe anesthesia effect and recovery time, and whether anesthesia state could meet the operation requirements or not of two groups of pregnant goats, recorded total sedative dose.Detected 10 kinds of indicators including heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure(MAP), blood pH value, arterial partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), blood glucose, blood lactic acid, epinephrine, norepinephrine and cortisol of pregnant goats at 2 time points of preoperative and postoperative.Compared difference of anesthesia effect between two groups and differences of these 10 kinds of indicators between different groups and time points.There were no significant differences between two groups in pregnant goat body mass and gestational age(P>0.05).

Results

①Comparison of anesthesia between two groups, preoperative intramuscular injection medicine, route of administration, duration of anesthesia and airway control were all the same, both two kinds of anesthesia could meet the requirements of intrauterine intervention for fetal goat, but there were slightly difficult for infusion group to control anesthesia depth.There were no significant differences between two groups in anesthesia effective time and postoperative starting recovery time (P>0.05). Ketamine doses in infusion group was less than injection group [(116.3±22.5) mg vs (209.3±20.8) mg], while 4.0% chloral hydrate and diazepam dose were more than injection group [(216.7±39.7) mL vs (165.4±19.5) mL, (19.2±3.4) mg vs (10.1±2.9) mg], the postoperative full recovery time was longer than injection group [(273.5±26.2) min vs (191.9±33.1) min], and there were significant differences(P<0.05). ②There were no significant differences between two groups in these 10 kinds of indicator before intervention(P>0.05). The level of blood lactate, epinephrine, norepinephrine and cortisol of pregnant goats after intervention were all higher than those of before intervention in infusion group [(6.0±0.8) mmol/L vs (3.7±0.6) mmol/L, (626.3±99.4) ng/L vs (167.3±35.4) ng/L, (6 631.9±753.2) ng/L vs (1 938.5±393.3) ng/L, (509.0±133.6) ng/L vs (219.9±33.3) ng/L]; and the same results in injection group[(5.0±0.6) mmol/L vs (3.2±0.8) mmol/L, (336.5±58.6) ng/L vs (189.6±32.4) ng/L, (4 063.5±834.7) ng/L vs (2 133.8±323.7) ng/L, (305.9±64.7) ng/L vs (187.3±31.5) ng/L]; the levels of these 4 kinds of indicator in infusion group after intervention were higher than those in injection group after intervention [(6.0±0.8) mmol/L vs (5.0±0.6) mmol/L, (626.3±99.4) ng/L vs (336.5±58.6) ng/L, (6 631.9±753.2) ng/L vs (4 063.5±834.7) ng/L, (509.0±133.6) ng/L vs (305.9±64.7) ng/L], and there were significant differences above all(P<0.05). There were no significant differences between any two groups or in the same group in any time point in pregnancy goat heart rate, MAP, blood pH value and PaO2(P>0.05).

Conclusions

The anesthesia program of 4.0% chloral hydrate intermittent injection combine with ketamine and diazepam in pregnant goat during fetal goat intrauterine cardiac intervention program was more secure and easier to operate because of the reduction dose of 4.0% chloral hydrate and diazepam.

Key words: Chloral hydrate, Ultrasonography, interventional, Cardiac surgical procedures, Anesthesia, Goats
表1 两组孕羊麻醉方案及效果比较(±s)
组别 羊数 孕羊体质量(kg) 孕龄(d) 术前肌内注射阿托品剂量(mg) 麻醉药物及总量 麻醉给药途径
4.0%水合氯醛(mL) 氯胺酮(mg) 地西泮(mg)
滴注组 20 41.4±6.7 111.3±8.6 0.5 216.7±39.7 116.3±22.5 19.2±3.4 静脉、肌内注射
推注组 20 38.2±7.3 113.8±9.5 0.5 165.4±19.5 209.3±20.8 10.1±2.9 静脉、肌内注射
t值   0.90 0.60 － 3.30 7.80 5.75 －
P值   >0.05 >0.05 － <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 －
组别 羊数 麻醉最快显效时间(min) 麻醉维持时间 控制麻醉深浅的难易程度 麻醉能否满足胎羊宫内介入手术 呼吸道控制情况(气管插管) 术后开始复苏时间(min) 术后完全复苏时间(min)
滴注组 20 3.9±1.7 持续 稍难 能 好 11.9±3.8 273.5±26.2
推注组 20 4.1±1.9 持续 易 能 好 13.1±2.6 191.9±33.1
t值   0.30 － － － － 0.70 5.50
P值   >0.05 － － － － >0.05 <0.05
表2 滴注组孕羊术前及术后10项监测指标比较(±s)
时间点 羊数 心率(次/min) MAP(mmHg) 血pH值 PaO2(mmHg) PaCO2(mmHg) 血糖(mmol/L) 血乳酸(mmol/L) 肾上腺素(ng/L) 去甲肾上腺素(ng/L) 皮质醇(ng/L)
术前 20 129±18 75.2±6.8 7.31±0.05 89.6±8.4 34.2±5.6 4.2±1.0 3.7±0.6 167.3±35.4 1 938.5±393.3 219.9± 33.3
术后 20 137±25 69.5±9.7 7.29±0.04 78.9±9.1 33.8±4.9 7.5±1.8 6.0±0.8 626.3±99.4 6 631.9±753.2 509.0±133.6
t值   1.16 2.00 1.39 1.60 3.86 7.05 3.70 4.50 24.70 54.90
P值   >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
表3 推注组孕羊术前及术后10项监测指标比较(±s)
时间点 羊数 心率(次/min) MAP(mmHg) 血pH值 PaO2(mmHg) PaCO2(mmHg) 血糖(mmol/L) 血乳酸(mmol/L) 肾上腺素(ng/L) 去甲肾上腺素(ng/L) 皮质醇(ng/L)
术前 20 131±21 70.3±5.9 7.28±0.06 85.3±12.8 36.4±6.3 5.1±1.1 3.2±0.8 189.6±32.4 2 133.8±323.7 187.3±31.5
术后 20 133±21 73.5±8.8 7.27±0.05 79.4±11.5 37.1±4.9 6.7±1.8 5.0±0.6 336.5±58.6 4 063.5±834.7 305.9±64.7
t值   0.30 1.30 0.57 1.50 0.39 3.40 7.50 9.80 9.60 7.40
P值   >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
表4 两组孕羊术后10项监测指标比较(±s)
组别 羊数 心率(次/min) MAP(mmHg) 血pH值 PaO2(mmHg) PaCO2(mmHg) 血糖(mmol/L) 血乳酸(mmol/L) 肾上腺素(ng/L) 去甲肾上腺素(ng/L) 皮质醇(ng/L)
滴注组 20 137±25 69.5±9.7 7.29±0.04 78.9± 9.1 33.8±4.9 7.5±1.8 6.0±0.8 626.3±99.4 6 631.9±753.2 509.0±133.6
推注组 20 133±21 73.5±8.8 7.27±0.05 79.4±11.5 37.1±4.9 6.7±1.8 5.0±0.6 336.5±58.6 4 063.5±834.7 305.9± 64.7
t值   0.55 1.30 1.40 0.15 2.12 1.38 4.49 11.21 10.21 6.11
P值   >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 <0.05 >0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
[1]
杨小玲，李尧清，田英．水合氯醛在猪外科实验中的麻醉效果[J]．四川动物，2001，20 (3)：165–166.
[2]
Dreyfus M，Becmeur F，Schwaab C，et al. The pregnant ewe：an animal model for fetoscopic surgery[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol，1997，71(1)：91–94.
[3]
Turley K，Vlahakes GJ，Harrison MR，et al. Intrauterine cardiothoracic surgery: the fetal lamb model[J]．Ann Thorac Surg，1982，34(4)：422–426.
[4]
Kohl T，Witteler R，Strümper D，et al. Operative techniques and strategies for minimally invasive fetoscopic fetal cardiac interventions in sheep[J]．Surg Endosc，2000，14(5)：424–430.
[5]
施新猷，主编．医学动物实验方法[M]．北京：人民卫生出版社，1980：120.
[6]
Galván-Montaño A，Hernández-Godínez B，Ibáñez-Contreras A，et al.Anesthetic management in intrauterine surgery to evaluate an experimental model of myelomeningocele in non human primates(Macaca mulatta)[J]．Acta Cir Bras，2010，25(3)：294–297.
[7]
王红伟，任爱红．氯胺酮临床作用的研究进展[J]．河南科技大学学报：医学版，2009，27(3)：236–238.
[8]
王贤裕，田玉科．小剂量氯胺酮镇痛的临床研究进展[J]．国外医学：麻醉学与复苏分册，2004，25(5)：295–298.
[9]
Wohlmuth C，Tulzer G，Arzt W，et al.Maternal aspects of fetal cardiac intervention[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol，2014，44(5)：532–537.
[10]
Ngamprasertwong P，Michelfelder EC，Arbabi S，et al.Anesthetic techniques for fetal surgery：effects of maternal anesthesia on intraoperative fetal outcomes in a sheep model[J]. Anesthesiology，2013，118(4)：796–808.
[11]
Ohashi Y，Terui K，Tamura K，et al，Success rate and challenges of fetal anesthesia for ultrasound guided fetal intervention by maternal opioid and benzodiazepine administration[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med，2013，26(2)：158–160.
[12]
Okutomi T，Whittington RA，Stein DJ，et al.Comparison of the effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia on the maternal-fetal unit in sheep[J]．J Anesth，2009，23(3)：392–398.
[13]
Garcia PJ，Olutoye OO，Ivey RT，et al.Case scenario：anesthesia for maternal-fetal surgery：the Ex Utero Intrapartum Therapy(EXIT) procedure[J]. Anesthesiology，2011，114(6)：1446–1452.
[14]
周成斌，庄建，温树生，等. 胎羊体外循环中的麻醉管理[J]．南方医科大学学报，2009，29(12)：2401–2403.
[15]
Lin EE，Tran KM.Anesthesia for fetal surgery[J]. Semin Pediatr Surg，2013，22(1)：50–55.
[1] 宋玟焱, 杜美君, 陈佳丽, 石冰, 黄汉尧. 唇腭裂手术围手术期疼痛管理的研究进展及基于生物材料治疗新方法的展望[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 397-405.
[2] 代莉, 郭华静, 邓恢伟. 镇痛-伤害性刺激指数指导下无阿片类药物麻醉对腔镜下甲状腺手术患者术后恢复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 282-286.
[3] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[4] 张丽娜, 邢建坤, 张梁, 李云生, 王兢, 孙丽莹, 朱志军. 婴幼儿活体肝移植受者术中麻醉护理单中心经验[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 235-238.
[5] 杜伟, 廖土明, 李雄才, 关刚强, 何燊, 吴佳桥, 朱和荣. 2%利多卡因凝胶和润滑剂凝胶在女性尿流动力学检查中应用的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 613-617.
[6] 杨勇军, 曾一鸣, 贺显雅, 卢强, 李远伟. ASA分级≥Ⅲ级患者局麻经会阴前列腺多模态影像融合穿刺的安全性和有效性[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-447.
[7] 何岩, 向文采. 七氟醚与异丙酚联合氯胺酮麻醉在疝修补术中的镇静镇痛效果及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 566-569.
[8] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
[9] 李先锋, 何懿, 程贞永, 邓国魁, 胡波, 谢红, 王莉, 王小燕, 李晓明. 右美托咪定对腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术患者血流动力学及麻醉复苏效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 437-441.
[10] 窦恩, 郑磊, 徐通海, 邓先锐. 局部神经阻滞麻醉在成人腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 442-445.
[11] 潘忠军, 戎国祥, 丁明, 殷优宏, 张双龙. 非气管插管麻醉下单孔胸腔镜手术对肺结节及血流动力学、炎性指标的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 272-275.
[12] 杨星, 刘梅, 刘思远, 张科. 胃肠癌患者术前焦虑情绪和术后苏醒期躁动情况及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 159-163.
[13] 胡小靖, 张华. 妊娠期卵巢囊肿蒂扭转的诊断与治疗[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 197-201.
[14] 刘建, 王文珠, 王倩. 老年髋部骨折术后肺损伤现状调查分析及影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 260-264.
[15] 王文珠, 刘建, 袁常秀, 石亚飞, 尤培军. 竖脊肌平面阻滞对非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中阿片类药物用量的影响[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 155-159.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号