切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2014, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01) : 18 -21. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2014.01.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

低强度超声辐照用于产后子宫复旧的临床观察
王龙琼1, 漆洪波1, 罗欣1,*,*(), 李成志2   
  1. 1. 400016 重庆,重庆医科大学附属第一医院产科
    2. 重庆医科大学生物医学工程学院,省部共建超声医学工程国家重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2013-11-19 修回日期:2014-01-03 出版日期:2014-02-01
  • 通信作者: 罗欣

Clinical Investigation of the Effects of Low-intensity Ultrasound Irradiation on Involution of Uterus After Delivery

Longqiong Wang1, Hongbo Qi1, Xin Luo1(), Chengzhi Li2   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
  • Received:2013-11-19 Revised:2014-01-03 Published:2014-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Xin Luo
  • About author:
    (Corresponding author: Luo Xin, Email: )
引用本文:

王龙琼, 漆洪波, 罗欣, 李成志. 低强度超声辐照用于产后子宫复旧的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2014, 10(01): 18-21.

Longqiong Wang, Hongbo Qi, Xin Luo, Chengzhi Li. Clinical Investigation of the Effects of Low-intensity Ultrasound Irradiation on Involution of Uterus After Delivery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2014, 10(01): 18-21.

目的

观察低强度超声辐照治疗对产后子宫复旧的影响。

方法

选择2012年6月至12月在重庆医科大学附属第一医院产科住院分娩的141例产妇为研究对象。采用单盲法(产妇对是否治疗不知情),按照分娩方式及是否接受低强度超声治疗将其分为剖宫产治疗组(n=46),剖宫产对照组(n=34),顺产治疗组(n=30)及顺产对照组(n=31)。顺产产妇于产后6 h开始第1次治疗,剖宫产产妇于产后24 h开始第1次治疗。治疗组采用超声波治疗仪进行超声治疗,2次/d, 30 min/次,连续治疗5次;对照组操作方法与治疗组一致,但不输出超声能量。临床观察各组患者治疗后宫底下降程度,恶露情况及疼痛(Vas)评分。各组产妇年龄等一般临床资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)(本研究遵循的程序符合重庆医科大学附属第一医院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书)。

结果

治疗后,治疗组宫底下降指数明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(H=31.710 0, 34.390 0,P<0.05);恶露结束时间明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(H=5.927 0,6.343 5,P<0.05)。治疗结束后,剖宫产治疗组Vas评分差值与剖宫产对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但顺产治疗组Vas评分差值与顺产对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

低强度超声治疗可促进产后子宫复旧,并可缩短产后恶露结束时间,但治疗对顺产妇产后Vas评分无影响,而不能改善其产后疼痛;仅能缓解剖宫产产妇子宫疼痛。

Objective

To investigate the effects of low-intensity ultrasound irradiation on involution of uterus after delivery.

Methods

From June 2012 to December 2012, a total of 141 cases delivered in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were studied. Using the single blind method (The patient didn't know whether be treated or not) , and they were divided into 4 groups: caesarean section treatment group (n=46) ,caesarean section control group (n=34) ,natural childbirth treatment group (n=30) and natural childbirth control group (n=31) ,according to the different childbirth way and whether by low-intensity ultrasound irradiation. The first treatment began in the first 6 hours after natural childbirth, compared with 24 hours who has the cesarean section. The treatment group received the ultrasound therapy 2 times a day, for 30 minutes every time, a overall treatment of 5 times; Operation method of control group was consistent with treatment group, but no ultrasound energy output. Observe the decline of fundus uteri, lochia clear time after delivery and visual analog scale score before and after the treatment. The maternal ages and other clinical characteristics of each group had no significant difference (P>0.05) . The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Beings of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Informed consent was obtained from each participating patient.

Results

The fundus decline index of treatment group was obviously better than the control group (H =31.710 0, 34.390 0, P<0.05) ,and the lochia clear time was significantly shorter than the control group (H=5.927 0, 6.343 5, P<0.05) .The visual analog scale (Vas) score of caesarean section treatment group had significant difference compared with the control group before and after treatment (P<0.05) , but there has no signifficant difference between two groups of natural childbirth of Vas score (P >0.05) .

Conclusions

The low-intensity ultrasound and shorten lochia clear time. It can alleviated the cesarean section uterine pain but not work for eutocia puerpera. irradiation can promote the involution of uterus and shorten lochia clear time. It can alleviate the cesarean section uterine pain but not work for eutocia puerpera.

图1 "韵产康"超声波子宫复旧仪
Figure 1 "Yun Chan Kang" ultrasonic therapy apparatus for uterine involution
表1 两组产妇一般情况比较(±s
Table 1 Comparison of clinical characteristics of two groups(±s
表2 两组产妇一般情况比较(±s
Table 2 Comparison of clinical characteristics of two groups(±s
表3 治疗后两组产妇宫底下降指数及恶露结束时间比较(±s
Table 3 Comparison of fundus decline index and lochia clear time of two groups(±s
表4 治疗后两组产妇宫底下降指数及恶露结束时间比较(±s
Table 4 Comparison of fundus decline index and lochia clear time of two groups(±s
表5 两组治疗前后Vas评分差值变化比较(±s
Table 5 Comparison of the visual analog scales difference before and after treatment of two groups(±s
表6 两组治疗前后Vas评分差值变化比较(±s
Table 6 Comparison of the visual analog scales difference before and after treatment of two groups(±s
[1]
阎莉.剖宫产术对子宫复旧的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2004,19(20):54-55.
[2]
肖娟,张海燕,张琳琳,等.产后子宫复旧不良发生现况分析[J].中国社区医师,2010(27):42-43.
[3]
Terhaar GR,Dyson M,Talbert D.Ultrasonically induced contractions in mouse uterine smooth muscle in vivo[J].Ultrason,1978,16(6):275-276.
[4]
常淑芳,朱深银,王智彪,等.超声体外诱导大鼠子宫平滑肌收缩的实验研究[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2006,28(7):450-452.
[5]
张瑛,孙江川,常淑芳,等.低强度超声引发大鼠子宫平滑肌收缩的量效关系研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2007,29(16):1566-1568.
[6]
王文平,孙江川,常淑芳,等.低强度超声诱导人产后离体子宫平滑肌收缩[J].中国医学影像技术,2009,25(6):953-955.
[7]
Hsu SH,Huang TB.Bio-effect of ultrasound on endothelial cells in vitro [J].Biomol Eng,2004,21(3-5):99-104.
[8]
Heinemann U.Basic mechanisms of partial epilepsies[J].Curr Opin Neurol,2004,17(2):155-159.
[9]
Sombati S,Delorenzo RJ.Recurrent spontaneous seizure activity in hippocampal neuronal networks in culture[J].J Neurophysiol,1995,73(4):1706-1711.
[10]
李力,易萍.产后出血及其临床救治[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2011,27(2):99-102.
[11]
戴芸.钙离子在胃肠平滑肌收缩机制中的作用[J].国外医学:消化系疾病分册,2002,22(1):17-20.
[12]
刘茂林,杨晓秋.阿是超声波治疗仪治疗软组织疼痛的疗效观察[A].中华医学会疼痛学分会第八届年会暨CASP成立二十周年论文集,2009: 193.
[1] 包艳娟, 杨小红, 张涛, 赵胜, 张莉. 阴道斜隔综合征的超声诊断与临床分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 859-864.
[2] 刘思锐, 赵辰阳, 张睿, 张一休, 杨萌. 多普勒超声对孕鼠子宫动脉不同节段血流动力学参数的评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 877-883.
[3] 王真真, 谢佳翊, 余涵, 沈雪. 隐匿性乳腺癌子宫转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 317-319.
[4] 李小飞, 刘洪莉, 石丘玲, 田静, 李莉, 漆洪波, 罗欣. 自然分娩产妇低强度聚焦超声子宫复旧治疗防治产后出血的前瞻性随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 534-539.
[5] 唐丹, 姚晓曦, 杨博文, 薛绍龙, 李梦瑶, 韦柳杏, 郄明蓉. 双肾上腺皮质激素样激酶1对子宫内膜样腺癌患者临床特征的影响[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 582-590.
[6] 李蓉. 薄型子宫内膜治疗新方法[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 591-591.
[7] 郑燕生, 吴舒婷. 保留子宫圆韧带及补片完整的经腹腹膜前疝修补术的早期经验[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 428-432.
[8] 田淞宇, 张明月, 张宇博. 圆韧带悬吊联合腹腔镜子宫全切术对患者术后阴道膨出的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 433-436.
[9] 张蕾, 彭超, 周应芳. 直肠阴道隔子宫内膜异位症腹腔镜手术技巧[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 257-261.
[10] 胡启明, 鄢潇, 尤志学, 黄骁昊. 经瘢痕处单孔腹腔镜下切除多病灶腹壁子宫内膜异位症[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 314-317.
[11] 魏莉, 张浩, 谭欣, 邓姗, 黄秀峰, 冯力民. 《宫腔镜下子宫肌瘤去除术管理规范》团体标准的解读[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 199-204.
[12] 芦煜, 李振宇, 吴承东, 周仲伍. 肛周子宫内膜异位症一例报告[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 431-434.
[13] 吴迪, 闫志风, 李明霞, 孟元光. 晚期子宫内膜癌免疫治疗的探索[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 231-237.
[14] 朱丽慈, 郑剑兰, 刘士璇, 张文蕾, 胡群, 陈丽旋. 妊娠期子宫嵌顿一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 232-236.
[15] 洪凡, 陈敦金, 傅洋, 梁新月, 吴毅, 王晓怡. 体外受精-胚胎移植妊娠合并前置胎盘临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 176-182.
阅读次数
全文


摘要