切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2013, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (06) : 809 -811. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2013.06.021

所属专题: 文献

论著

阴式子宫肌瘤剔除术与腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床疗效对比分析
高维萍1,*,*(), 刘琼娜1, 刘婷婷1   
  1. 1. 223002 江苏省淮安市第二人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2013-04-11 修回日期:2013-09-14 出版日期:2013-12-01
  • 通信作者: 高维萍

Comparative Outcomes Between Transvaginal Myomectomy and Laparoscopic Myomectomy

Wei-ping GAO1(), Qiong-na LIU1, Ting-ting LIU1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Huai' an Second People's Hospital, Huan'an 223002, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2013-04-11 Revised:2013-09-14 Published:2013-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Wei-ping GAO
  • About author:
    (Corresponding author : GAO Wei-ping, Email : )
引用本文:

高维萍, 刘琼娜, 刘婷婷. 阴式子宫肌瘤剔除术与腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床疗效对比分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2013, 09(06): 809-811.

Wei-ping GAO, Qiong-na LIU, Ting-ting LIU. Comparative Outcomes Between Transvaginal Myomectomy and Laparoscopic Myomectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2013, 09(06): 809-811.

目的

探讨阴式子宫肌瘤剔除术(TVM)和腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床疗效。

方法

选择2006年6月至2011年6月在江苏省淮安市第二人民医院行TVM患者35例为研究对象,并纳入阴式组,随机选择同期在本院接受腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术患者41例纳入腹腔镜组。两组患者年龄、子宫肌瘤大小、阴道分娩史和盆腔手术比例等比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0. 05)。对比分析两组的临床疗效。

结果

阴式组和腹腔镜组患者的手术成功率、手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气及术后病率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0. 05);阴式组剔除肌壁间肌瘤数多于腹腔镜组,而住院时间与住院费用显著少于腹腔镜组,两组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0. 05)。

结论

TVM具有微创、安全及经济的优点,值得临床推广应用。

Objective

To compare the clinical effectiveness, safety between transvaginal myomectomy (TVM). and laparoscopic myomectomy.

Methods

The clinical data of 35 patients with TVM (TVM group) and 41 patients with laparoscopic myomectomys (laparoscope group) between June 2006 to June 2010 in Huan'an Second People's Hospital were collected and compared. There was no statistical differences on age,the size of uterine fibroid,history of vaginal delivery and operation on pelvis in the past medical history between the two groups.

Results

No statistical differences were found in the successful rate of operation, operation duration, duration, blood loss,myoma size,the time of first passage of flatus and postoperative morbidity between 2 groups (P>0. 05). More myoma, shorter hospital stays and less hospitalization expenses were achieved in TVM group compared with laparoscope group.

Conclusions

TVM is highly recommended because of its mininal invasiveness, safety and economy advantages.

表1 两组患者的一般临床资料比较( ± s)
Table 1 Comparison of clinical data between two groups ( ± s)
表2 两组患者的术中情况比较(±s)
Table 2 Intraoperative conditions between two groups (±s)
表3 两组患者的术后情况比较(±s)
Table 3 Postoperative conditions between two groups (±s)
1
Jing WL, Liu W, Wang SJ, et al. A clinical research on vaginal myomectomy[J]. Prog Obstet Gynecol, 2005,14: 62-63.
2
Radosa MP, Winzer H, Mothes AR, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy inperi- and post-menopausal women is safe,efficacious and associated with long-term patient satisfaction[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2012,162(2): 192-196.
3
Fambrini M, Tondi F, Scarselli G,et al. Comparison of the number of uterine myomas detected by inoffice transvaginal ultrasonography removed by laparotomic my omectomy : Preoperative work-up concerns[J]. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 2009,36(2) : 97-101.
4
Rovio PH, Heinonen PK. Transvaginal myomectomy with screw traction by coipotomy[J]. Arch Gynecol Obste, 2006, 273 (4) : 211-215.
5
Zhu JP, Wu D. Comparison analysis of outcome between transvaginal myomectomy and laparoscopic myomectomy[J]. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet, 2008,24(1): 56-57.
6
Gong TLY. Foundation and procedure of vaginal surgery [M]. Tianjin: Tianjin Technology Publishing Company, 2001.
7
Chen YQ. Current status and prospect of transvaginal operation on uterus[J]. J Pract Obstet Gynecol, 2007,23(1): 3-5.
[1] 杨媛媛, 黄鹤光, 陈燕昌, 陆逢春, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 王丛菲. 机器人与腹腔镜手术治疗造口旁疝18例临床分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 336-340.
[2] 张太平, 翁桂湖, 刘悦泽. 不断推进中国腹腔镜胰腺癌手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 120-123.
[3] 刘宁, 耿伟民, 刘昆强. 腹腔高位隐睾Fowler-Stephen手术二期开放与腹腔镜手术对比分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 299-302.
[4] 中国医师协会妇产科医师分会妇科单孔腹腔镜全国科研协作组. 妇科单孔腹腔镜手术镜下联合体外操作模式临床应用专家共识[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 200-209.
[5] 罗曼文, 黄桔园, 刘艳燕, 易跃雄, 陈雨柔, 熊家强, 王景涛, 张蔚. 单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤旋切隔离保护技术的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 220-226.
[6] 缪妙, 邢庭玮, 陈继明, 陈尧, 夏百荣, 单武林, 唐斌, 杜雨, 郑虹, 施如霞. 单孔腹腔镜镜下联合体外操作模式在妇科疾病诊治中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 120-123.
[7] 李骞, 成凯, 李传富, 齐硕, 丁成明, 贺军, 陈国栋. ERAS背景下机器人与腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的对比分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 73-78.
[8] 曾纪晓, 徐晓钢, 刘斐, 兰梦龙, 陶波圆, 梁子建, 王欣星. 单孔腹腔镜在先天性长段型巨结肠分期手术的运用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 96-100.
[9] 黎文娴, 余航, 文芳, 赵文文, 訾聃. 经阴道自然腔道内镜手术在巨大卵巢良性肿瘤中的应用初探[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 357-363.
[10] 王举, 高小平, 张凤联, 姜世洲, 王永强, 姜洪伟. 免器械手工吻合技术在完全腹腔镜左半结肠切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 341-346.
[11] 邱文龙, 刘军广, 胡刚, 梅世文, 汤坚强. 腹腔镜低位直肠癌经括约肌间切除术后的长期生存结果及预后因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 207-213.
[12] 孙秀艳, 徐庆蕾, 马鹏涛, 胡志元, 郭传真, 祝成红. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术中患者体温变化与压力性损伤及受压部位微环境的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 480-484.
[13] 马洪庆, 于淼, 张建锋, 武雪亮, 胡旭华, 王光林, 孟泽松, 于滨, 王贵英. 混合入路与传统中央入路在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中的疗效分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 545-550.
[14] 翟振远, 黄金霞, 刘晓燕. 腹腔镜筋膜外子宫附件全切加前哨淋巴结显影切除治疗中老年子宫内膜癌疗效分析[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2022, 09(04): 26-29.
[15] 佟鑫, 何毅, 周莹, 付强. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖合并风湿性心脏病患者麻醉管理一例[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 143-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要