切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2013, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (01) : 81 -84. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2013.01.018

所属专题: 文献

论著

重症手足口病患儿呼吸机相关性肺炎的危险因素分析
胡冰1,*,*(), 黄先红1, 王贵莲1, 胡华著1   
  1. 1. 336000 江西宜春,江西省宜春市人民医院儿科
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-23 修回日期:2012-11-30 出版日期:2013-02-01
  • 通信作者: 胡冰

High Risk Factors Analysis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Severe Hand-Foot-Mouth Disease Patients

Bing HU1(), Xian-hong HUANG1, Gui-lian WANG1, Hua-zhu HU1   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, First People's Hospital of Yichun, Yichun 336000, Jiangxi Province, China
  • Received:2012-09-23 Revised:2012-11-30 Published:2013-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Bing HU
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: HU Bing, Email:
引用本文:

胡冰, 黄先红, 王贵莲, 胡华著. 重症手足口病患儿呼吸机相关性肺炎的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2013, 09(01): 81-84.

Bing HU, Xian-hong HUANG, Gui-lian WANG, Hua-zhu HU. High Risk Factors Analysis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Severe Hand-Foot-Mouth Disease Patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2013, 09(01): 81-84.

目的

探讨重症手足口病(HFMD)机械通气后并发呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的危险因素。

方法

收集2009年3月至2012年4月,本院儿科重症监护室(PICU)收治的使用呼吸机时间>48 h的重症HFMD患儿142例为研究对象,按照有无合并VAP,将其分为2组,VAP组(n=64,并发VAP)和对照组(n=78,未并发VAP)。2组患儿的性别、年龄、体重、病情程度等比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)(本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象监护人的知情同意)。以年龄、性别、机械通气时间、合并贫血、合并营养不良、机械通气过程中是否再插管、机械通气时间、频繁气管内吸引、合并肺出血、合并呼吸道免疫功能低下、是否预防性使用抗菌药物等为预想危险因素进行单因素及非条件多因素logistic分析,探讨各危险因素与VAP的相关性。

结果

VAP组与对照组患儿病死率分别为12.50% (8/64),3.85%(3/78),2组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.88, P<0.05)。非条件多因素logistic回归分析显示,各危险因素在重症HFMD患儿发生VAP中的顺序依次为:机械通气过程中是否再插管、机械通气时间、频繁气管内吸引、合并肺出血、合并呼吸道免疫功能低下,但预防性使用抗菌药物为保护性因素。

结论

重症HFMD患儿机械通气后并发VAP发生率较高,相关危险因素多,采取针对性防治措施可能是控制VAP的最佳方案。

Objective

To explore high risk factors of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in severe hand-foot-mouth disease (HFMD) patients.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted in 142 serious HFMD patients who had mechanical ventilation≥48 h from March 2009 to April 2012. They were divided into two groups according to whether they suffered VAP nor not, VAP group (n=64, patients suffered from VAP) and control group (n=78, patients without VAP). There had no significant differences between two groups on gender, age, weight and degrees of HFMD (P>0.05). The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of Affiliated Hospital of First People's Hospital of Yichun. Informed consent was obtained from all participates' parents. Single-factor analysis with Chi-square test and non-conditional multi-factor logistic regression were performed to determine risk factors, such as age, gender, duration of mechanical ventilation, reintubation, duration of mechanical ventilation, frequency of airway suctioning, pulmonary hemorrhage, poor respiratory immune function, and so on.

Results

The mortality of two groups were 12.50%(8/64), 3.85%(3/78), respectively. There had significant difference between two groups (χ2=3.88, P<0.05). By multi-factor logistic regression analysis, the risk factors in the role of VAP happened for the order size were reintubation, duration of mechanical ventilation, frequency airway suctioning, pulmonary hemorrhage, poor respiratory immune function. The usage of antibiotic was a protection factor in preventing from VAP.

Conclusions

Incidence rate of VAP in HFMD is high, with many risk factors. And specific preventive countermeasures and cure treatments may be the best way to manage VAP.

表1 2组患儿病死率比较[n(%)]
Table 1 Comparison of mortality between two groups[n(%)]
表2 2组患儿危险因素的单因素分析结果[n(%)]
Table 2 Single-factor analysis results of risk factors of two groups[n(%)]
表3 2组患儿危险因素的非条件多因素logistic回归分析
Table 3 Multi-factor logistic regression analysis of risk factors of two groups
[1]
Huang RW, Wu XL, Yang RY. Analysis of death cases with hand-foot-and-mouth disease[J/CD]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol Pediatr: Electron Ed, 2011, 7(4):318-320.
[2]
Sheng MH, Ye XG. The new diagnosis and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia [J]. Med Recapitul, 2005, 11(3):242-244.
[3]
Tao JP. Strategy of mechanical ventilation in serious hand foot and mouth disease [J]. Chin J Pract Pediatr, 2010, 25(2):117-118.
[4]
Li HY, He LJ, Hu BJ, et al. The impact of gastric colonization on the pathogenesis of ventilator-associated pneumonia[J]. Chin J Intern Med, 2004, 43(2):112-116.
[5]
Rello J, Paiva A, Baraibai J, et al. International conference for the development if consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia[J]. Chest, 2001, 120:955-970.
[6]
George DL. Epidemiology of nosocomial pneunonia in intensive care unit patients[J]. Chin Chest Med, 1995, 16(1):29.
[7]
Cordero L, Sananes M, Ayers LW. A comparison of two airway suctioning frequencies in mechanically ventilated, very-low-birth weigh infants[J]. Respir Care, 2001, 46:783-788.
[8]
Hou HP, Yao RL.A study about decrease the incidence rate of sputum drainage complication among the newborns [J]. Chin J Pract Nurs, 2006, 22(8):40-41.
[9]
Kishor U, Marma PU. Protective role of pulmonary surfactant proteins, SP-A and SP-D, anainst lung allergy and infection caused by Aspergillus fumigatus[J]. Immunobiology, 2002, 205(425):610-618.
[1] 明昊, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 宋宏萍. 乳腺癌风险预测模型的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 287-291.
[2] 庄燕, 戴林峰, 张海东, 陈秋华, 聂清芳. 脓毒症患者早期生存影响因素及Cox 风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 372-378.
[3] 黄鸿初, 黄美容, 温丽红. 血液系统恶性肿瘤患者化疗后粒细胞缺乏感染的危险因素和风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 285-292.
[4] 罗文斌, 韩玮. 胰腺癌患者首次化疗后中重度骨髓抑制的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 357-362.
[5] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[6] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[7] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[8] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[9] 刘春军, 严方方, 王宝锋, 常婷婷, 郭红红, 李志强. 替加环素联合人免疫球蛋白治疗XDRAB致VAP 的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 797-800.
[10] 张伟伟, 陈启, 翁和语, 黄亮. 随机森林模型预测T1 期结直肠癌淋巴结转移的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 389-393.
[11] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[12] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[13] 李文哲, 王毅, 崔建, 郑启航, 王靖彦, 于湘友. 新疆维吾尔自治区重症患者急性肾功能异常的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 269-276.
[14] 刘志超, 胡风云, 温春丽. 山西省脑卒中危险因素与地域的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 424-433.
[15] 曹亚丽, 高雨萌, 张英谦, 李博, 杜军保, 金红芳. 儿童坐位不耐受的临床进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要