切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2013, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (01) : 81 -84. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2013.01.018

所属专题: 文献

论著

重症手足口病患儿呼吸机相关性肺炎的危险因素分析
胡冰1,*,*(), 黄先红1, 王贵莲1, 胡华著1   
  1. 1. 336000 江西宜春,江西省宜春市人民医院儿科
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-23 修回日期:2012-11-30 出版日期:2013-02-01
  • 通信作者: 胡冰

High Risk Factors Analysis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Severe Hand-Foot-Mouth Disease Patients

Bing HU1(), Xian-hong HUANG1, Gui-lian WANG1, Hua-zhu HU1   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, First People's Hospital of Yichun, Yichun 336000, Jiangxi Province, China
  • Received:2012-09-23 Revised:2012-11-30 Published:2013-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Bing HU
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: HU Bing, Email:
引用本文:

胡冰, 黄先红, 王贵莲, 胡华著. 重症手足口病患儿呼吸机相关性肺炎的危险因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2013, 09(01): 81-84.

Bing HU, Xian-hong HUANG, Gui-lian WANG, Hua-zhu HU. High Risk Factors Analysis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Severe Hand-Foot-Mouth Disease Patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2013, 09(01): 81-84.

目的

探讨重症手足口病(HFMD)机械通气后并发呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的危险因素。

方法

收集2009年3月至2012年4月,本院儿科重症监护室(PICU)收治的使用呼吸机时间>48 h的重症HFMD患儿142例为研究对象,按照有无合并VAP,将其分为2组,VAP组(n=64,并发VAP)和对照组(n=78,未并发VAP)。2组患儿的性别、年龄、体重、病情程度等比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)(本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象监护人的知情同意)。以年龄、性别、机械通气时间、合并贫血、合并营养不良、机械通气过程中是否再插管、机械通气时间、频繁气管内吸引、合并肺出血、合并呼吸道免疫功能低下、是否预防性使用抗菌药物等为预想危险因素进行单因素及非条件多因素logistic分析,探讨各危险因素与VAP的相关性。

结果

VAP组与对照组患儿病死率分别为12.50% (8/64),3.85%(3/78),2组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.88, P<0.05)。非条件多因素logistic回归分析显示,各危险因素在重症HFMD患儿发生VAP中的顺序依次为:机械通气过程中是否再插管、机械通气时间、频繁气管内吸引、合并肺出血、合并呼吸道免疫功能低下,但预防性使用抗菌药物为保护性因素。

结论

重症HFMD患儿机械通气后并发VAP发生率较高,相关危险因素多,采取针对性防治措施可能是控制VAP的最佳方案。

Objective

To explore high risk factors of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in severe hand-foot-mouth disease (HFMD) patients.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted in 142 serious HFMD patients who had mechanical ventilation≥48 h from March 2009 to April 2012. They were divided into two groups according to whether they suffered VAP nor not, VAP group (n=64, patients suffered from VAP) and control group (n=78, patients without VAP). There had no significant differences between two groups on gender, age, weight and degrees of HFMD (P>0.05). The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of Affiliated Hospital of First People's Hospital of Yichun. Informed consent was obtained from all participates' parents. Single-factor analysis with Chi-square test and non-conditional multi-factor logistic regression were performed to determine risk factors, such as age, gender, duration of mechanical ventilation, reintubation, duration of mechanical ventilation, frequency of airway suctioning, pulmonary hemorrhage, poor respiratory immune function, and so on.

Results

The mortality of two groups were 12.50%(8/64), 3.85%(3/78), respectively. There had significant difference between two groups (χ2=3.88, P<0.05). By multi-factor logistic regression analysis, the risk factors in the role of VAP happened for the order size were reintubation, duration of mechanical ventilation, frequency airway suctioning, pulmonary hemorrhage, poor respiratory immune function. The usage of antibiotic was a protection factor in preventing from VAP.

Conclusions

Incidence rate of VAP in HFMD is high, with many risk factors. And specific preventive countermeasures and cure treatments may be the best way to manage VAP.

表1 2组患儿病死率比较[n(%)]
Table 1 Comparison of mortality between two groups[n(%)]
表2 2组患儿危险因素的单因素分析结果[n(%)]
Table 2 Single-factor analysis results of risk factors of two groups[n(%)]
表3 2组患儿危险因素的非条件多因素logistic回归分析
Table 3 Multi-factor logistic regression analysis of risk factors of two groups
[1]
Huang RW, Wu XL, Yang RY. Analysis of death cases with hand-foot-and-mouth disease[J/CD]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol Pediatr: Electron Ed, 2011, 7(4):318-320.
[2]
Sheng MH, Ye XG. The new diagnosis and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia [J]. Med Recapitul, 2005, 11(3):242-244.
[3]
Tao JP. Strategy of mechanical ventilation in serious hand foot and mouth disease [J]. Chin J Pract Pediatr, 2010, 25(2):117-118.
[4]
Li HY, He LJ, Hu BJ, et al. The impact of gastric colonization on the pathogenesis of ventilator-associated pneumonia[J]. Chin J Intern Med, 2004, 43(2):112-116.
[5]
Rello J, Paiva A, Baraibai J, et al. International conference for the development if consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia[J]. Chest, 2001, 120:955-970.
[6]
George DL. Epidemiology of nosocomial pneunonia in intensive care unit patients[J]. Chin Chest Med, 1995, 16(1):29.
[7]
Cordero L, Sananes M, Ayers LW. A comparison of two airway suctioning frequencies in mechanically ventilated, very-low-birth weigh infants[J]. Respir Care, 2001, 46:783-788.
[8]
Hou HP, Yao RL.A study about decrease the incidence rate of sputum drainage complication among the newborns [J]. Chin J Pract Nurs, 2006, 22(8):40-41.
[9]
Kishor U, Marma PU. Protective role of pulmonary surfactant proteins, SP-A and SP-D, anainst lung allergy and infection caused by Aspergillus fumigatus[J]. Immunobiology, 2002, 205(425):610-618.
[1] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[2] 马艳波, 华扬, 刘桂梅, 孟秀峰, 崔立平. 中青年人颈动脉粥样硬化病变的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 822-826.
[3] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[4] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[5] 陈旭渊, 罗仕云, 李文忠, 李毅. 腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 82-85.
[6] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[7] 莫闲, 杨闯. 肝硬化患者并发门静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 678-683.
[8] 侯超, 潘美辰, 吴文明, 黄兴广, 李翔, 程凌雪, 朱玉轩, 李文波. 早期食管癌及上皮内瘤变内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 383-387.
[9] 张雯, 宋牡丹, 邓雪婷, 张云. 强化营养支持辅助奥曲肽治疗肝硬化合并食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的疗效及再出血危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 456-460.
[10] 陆猛桂, 黄斌, 李秋林, 何媛梅. 蜂蛰伤患者发生多器官功能障碍综合征的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1010-1015.
[11] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[12] 李琪, 黄钟莹, 袁平, 关振鹏. 基于某三级医院的ICU多重耐药菌医院感染影响因素的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
[13] 孟科, 李燕, 闫婧爽, 闫斌. 胶囊内镜胃通过时间的影响因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 671-675.
[14] 杨艳丽, 陈昱, 赵若辰, 杜伟, 马海娟, 许珂, 张莉芸. 系统性红斑狼疮合并血流感染的危险因素及细菌学分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 694-699.
[15] 孙培培, 张二明, 时延伟, 赵春燕, 宋萍萍, 张硕, 张克, 周玉娇, 赵璨, 闫维, 吴蓉菊, 宋丽萍, 郭伟安, 马石头, 安欣华, 包曹歆, 向平超. 北京市石景山区40岁及以上居民慢性阻塞性肺疾病患病情况及相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-719.
阅读次数
全文


摘要