切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2013, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (01) : 40 -43. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2013.01.009

所属专题： 文献；

论著

宫腔镜和腹腔镜联合治疗输卵管性不孕的临床分析
龚衍1, 曾玖芝1,*,*(), 李运星1, 江酉琼1, 叶飞1, 侯明霞1, 朱爱宁1   
  1. 1. 610031　成都，四川省妇幼保健院生殖健康科
  • 收稿日期:2012-05-06 修回日期:2012-11-14 出版日期:2013-02-01
  • 通信作者: 曾玖芝

Clinical Analysis of Tubal Infertility Treated by Hysteroscopy Combined With Laparoscopy

Yan GONG1, Jiu-zhi ZENG1(), Yun-xing LI1, You-qiong JIANG1, Fei YE1, Ming-xia HOU1, Ai-ning ZHU1   

  1. 1. Department of Reproductive Medicine, Sichuan Maternal and Children's Hospital, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2012-05-06 Revised:2012-11-14 Published:2013-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Jiu-zhi ZENG
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: ZENG Jiu-zhi, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

龚衍, 曾玖芝, 李运星, 江酉琼, 叶飞, 侯明霞, 朱爱宁. 宫腔镜和腹腔镜联合治疗输卵管性不孕的临床分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2013, 09(01): 40-43.

Yan GONG, Jiu-zhi ZENG, Yun-xing LI, You-qiong JIANG, Fei YE, Ming-xia HOU, Ai-ning ZHU. Clinical Analysis of Tubal Infertility Treated by Hysteroscopy Combined With Laparoscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2013, 09(01): 40-43.

目的

探讨宫腔镜和腹腔镜联合治疗输卵管性不孕的临床价值。

方法

选择2007年1月至2008年12月因输卵管性不孕于本院就诊并行宫腔镜和腹腔镜联合治疗的不孕症患者116例为研究对象。按术后是否妊娠，将其分为妊娠组(n＝43)和未孕组(n＝73)。分析术后自然妊娠率，输卵管、盆腔病变程度与妊娠率的关系及术后最佳妊娠时间等(本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准，得到该委员会批准，并与受试者签署临床研究知情同意书)。妊娠组与未孕组患者年龄、不孕年限及孕产史比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结果

116例患者术后随访30个月，共计43例妊娠，妊娠率为37.07%。术后妊娠率与输卵管、盆腔病变严重程度有关，轻、中、重度患者术后妊娠率分别为54.05%(20/37)，42.11%(16/38)，17.07%(7/41)，3者间比较，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1～6个月，7～12个月，13～18个月，19～24个月及25～30个月的妊娠率分别为13.79%(16/116)，12.07%(14/116)，8.62%(10/116)，2.59%(3/116)和0(0/116)，术后18个月内妊娠率为93.02%(40/43)。

结论

输卵管性不孕患者宫、腹腔镜联合治疗输卵管性不孕，术后妊娠率与输卵管、盆腔病变程度相关，病变轻者的术后妊娠率较高。经宫、腹腔镜联合治疗后，本组妊娠率患者于术后18个月内的妊娠率较高。

关键词: 宫腔镜手术, 腹腔镜手术, 输卵管性不孕
Objective

To investigate the clinical value of tubal infertility treated by hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopy (H-laparoscopy).

Methods

From January 2007 to December 2008, a total of 116 cases with tubal infertility were treated by H-laparoscopy and followed up. They were divided into pregnancy group (n=43) and non-pregnant group (n=73) according to if they were pregnant or not after the treatment. The natural pregnancy rate, relationship between tubal pelvic disease severity and natural pregnancy rate, best pregnancy time were studied. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of Sichuan Maternal and Children's Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all participates. There had no significant difference between pregnancy group and non-pregnant group on patient's age, duration of infertility and pregnancy history (P>0.05).

Results

One hundred and sixteen patients were followed up for 30 months, a total of 43 cases were pregnant. The natural pregnancy rate was 37.07%. Pregnancy rate was related with pelvic disease severity, that means, the pregnancy rate of mild, moderate and severe degree patients were 54.05% (20/37), 42.11%(16/38) and 17.07%(7/14), respectively, there had significant difference among three degrees (P<0.05). The pregnancy rate during 1-6 months, 7-12 months, 13-18 months, 19-24 months and 25-30 months after the operation were 13.79%(16/116), 12.07%(14/116), 8.62%(10/116), 2.59%(3/116), and 0(0/116). The pregnancy rate during 18 months after operation was 93.02%(40/43).

Conclusions

The pregnancy rate of tubal infertility after operation is related with tubal pelvic disease severity. The patient of mild degree have higher pregnancy rate in 18 months after operation.

Key words: hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, tubal infertility
表1 输卵管、盆腔病变分度标准
Table 1 Classification standards of tubal pelvic disease
分度 输卵管、卵巢周围粘连 输卵管纤维化、扩张 输卵管黏膜病变
轻度 局部、膜状 无 无
中度 局部、致密 单侧，扩张≤1.5 cm 单侧
重度 广泛、致密 双侧，扩张>1.5 cm 双侧
表2 术后是否妊娠与患者年龄、不孕年限、孕产史的关系 (±s)
Table 2 Relationship between pregnancy rate and patients' age, length of infertility and pregnancy history (±s)
组别 n 年龄(岁) 不孕年限(年) 孕产史[n(%)]
原发性不孕 继发性不孕
妊娠组 43 29.56±4.93 3.63±2.50 13(30.23) 30(69.77)
未孕组 73 28.70±4.84 4.04±2.69 26(35.62) 47(64.38)
t/χ2 ? t＝0.918 t＝0.824 χ2＝0.351
P ? 0.361 0.414 0.553
表3 2组患者输卵管、盆腔病变程度比较[n(%)]
Table 3 Comparision of tubal pelvic disease severity between two groups [n(%)]
组别 n 轻度 中度 重度
妊娠组 43 20(46.51) 16(37.21) 7(16.28)
未孕组 73 17(23.29) 22(30.14) 34(46.58)
合计 116 37(31.90) 38(32.76) 41(35.34)
表4 术后不同时间段妊娠率比较 (%)
Table 4 Comparison of pregnancy rate in each time after surgery (%)
术后时间(个月) 妊娠(n) 构成比 累计构成比 妊娠率 累计妊娠率
1～ 6 16 37.21 37.21 13.79 13.79
7～12 14 32.56 69.77 12.07 25.86
13～18 10 23.26 93.02 8.62 34.48
19～24 3 6.97 100.00 2.59 37.07
25～30 0 0.00 100.00 0.00 37.07
合计 43 100.00 100.00 37.07 37.07
[1]
Yue J, ed. Obstetrics and gynecology. 7th ed[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2008, 351.
[2]
Liu Q, Li YM, Zhang XG, et al. Clinical analysis of 42 cases infertility treated by hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopy[J/CD]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol Pediatr: Electron Ed, 2008, 4(6):579-580.
[3]
Chinese Medical Association. Clinical practice guidelines: ART and sperm bank[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2009, 99.
[4]
Cao ZY, ed. Chinese obstetrics and gynecology. 2nd ed[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2008, 2100.
[5]
Wang HY, Qiao J, Ma CH, et al. Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic treatment of tubal adhesion and tubal distal occlusion[J]. Chin J Min Inv Surg, 2007, 7(3):221-223.
[6]
Tommaso F, ed. Clinical reproductive medicine and surgery[M]. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press, 2010, 623.
[7]
Wu LL, Yu MZ. Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic treatment of 135 cases of tubal distal occlusion[J]. Guangdong Med J, 2006, 27(3):393-394.
[8]
Tommaso F, ed. Clinical reproductive medicine and surgery[M]. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press, 2010, 763.
[1] 杨媛媛, 黄鹤光, 陈燕昌, 陆逢春, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 王丛菲. 机器人与腹腔镜手术治疗造口旁疝18例临床分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 336-340.
[2] 张太平, 翁桂湖, 刘悦泽. 不断推进中国腹腔镜胰腺癌手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 120-123.
[3] 刘宁, 耿伟民, 刘昆强. 腹腔高位隐睾Fowler-Stephen手术二期开放与腹腔镜手术对比分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 299-302.
[4] 中国医师协会妇产科医师分会妇科单孔腹腔镜全国科研协作组. 妇科单孔腹腔镜手术镜下联合体外操作模式临床应用专家共识[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 200-209.
[5] 缪妙, 邢庭玮, 陈继明, 陈尧, 夏百荣, 单武林, 唐斌, 杜雨, 郑虹, 施如霞. 单孔腹腔镜镜下联合体外操作模式在妇科疾病诊治中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 120-123.
[6] 李骞, 成凯, 李传富, 齐硕, 丁成明, 贺军, 陈国栋. ERAS背景下机器人与腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的对比分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 73-78.
[7] 曾纪晓, 徐晓钢, 刘斐, 兰梦龙, 陶波圆, 梁子建, 王欣星. 单孔腹腔镜在先天性长段型巨结肠分期手术的运用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 96-100.
[8] 黎文娴, 余航, 文芳, 赵文文, 訾聃. 经阴道自然腔道内镜手术在巨大卵巢良性肿瘤中的应用初探[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 357-363.
[9] 王举, 高小平, 张凤联, 姜世洲, 王永强, 姜洪伟. 免器械手工吻合技术在完全腹腔镜左半结肠切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 341-346.
[10] 邱文龙, 刘军广, 胡刚, 梅世文, 汤坚强. 腹腔镜低位直肠癌经括约肌间切除术后的长期生存结果及预后因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 207-213.
[11] 孙秀艳, 徐庆蕾, 马鹏涛, 胡志元, 郭传真, 祝成红. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术中患者体温变化与压力性损伤及受压部位微环境的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 480-484.
[12] 马洪庆, 于淼, 张建锋, 武雪亮, 胡旭华, 王光林, 孟泽松, 于滨, 王贵英. 混合入路与传统中央入路在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中的疗效分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 545-550.
[13] 戴莉, 高红艳, 邢肖肖, 王清, 彭妍, 李沁, 王慧. 经阴道子宫憩室修补联合宫腔镜内膜电灼术治疗剖宫产瘢痕憩室的效果分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(12): 1243-1247.
[14] 孙益峰, 姜皓耀, 李斌, 顾海勇, 李春光, 李志刚. 腔镜辅助下回结肠代食管术11例[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2022, 09(04): 235-240.
[15] 佟鑫, 何毅, 周莹, 付强. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖合并风湿性心脏病患者麻醉管理一例[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 143-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号