切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2012, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (06) : 779 -780. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2012.06.028

所属专题: 文献

短篇论著

3种保守方法治疗异位妊娠的疗效比较
张承敏1,*()   
  1. 1. 010020 呼和浩特,内蒙古医学院附属人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2012-06-10 修回日期:2012-11-15 出版日期:2012-12-01
  • 通信作者: 张承敏
  • Received:2012-06-10 Revised:2012-11-15 Published:2012-12-01
引用本文:

张承敏. 3种保守方法治疗异位妊娠的疗效比较[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2012, 08(06): 779-780.

表1 3组患者临床资料比较(±s)
Table 1 Comparison of clinical data among three groups (±s)
表2 3组治疗效果比较[n(%)]
Table 2 Comparison of treatment effect among three groups[n(%)]
表3 3组药物不良反应比较[n(%)]
Table 3 Comparison of drug side effects among three groups [n(%)]
[1]
Xiao XL, Song Q.Analysis of the relative factors of ectopic pregnancy[J/CD]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol Pediatr:Electron Ed, 2010, 6(2):110-112.
[2]
Chandrasekhar C.Ectopic pregnancy: A pictorial review[J/CD]. Clin Imag, 2008, 32:468-473.
[3]
Dai AL.Observation of methotrexat combined with mifepristone on unrupture ectopic pregnancy[J].Jilin Med J, 2011(23):4775.
[4]
Wang YL.Analysis of methotrexat combined with mifepristone on unrupture ectopic pregnancy:90 cases[J].J Clin Exp Med, 2010, 9(1):57.
[5]
Yu XL.101 case analysis of joint mifepristone influences methotrexate therapy tubal pregnancy[J].Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet, 2007, 23(5):390.
[6]
Zhang JL.Progress on pharmacotherapy ectopic pregnancy[J/CD].Chin J Obstet Gynecol Pediatr:Electron Ed, 2011, 7(1):68-71.
No related articles found!
阅读次数
全文


摘要