切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2012, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (06) : 729 -732. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2012.06.014

所属专题: 文献

论著

不同剂量紫杉醇联合顺铂新辅助化疗对局部ⅠB2~ⅡB期宫颈癌疗效分析
钟亚娟1, 张蔚1,*,*(), 张文婷1, 吕琼莹1, 程静1, 曾康康1   
  1. 1. 430060 武汉,武汉大学人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2012-06-19 修回日期:2012-10-28 出版日期:2012-12-01
  • 通信作者: 张蔚

Clinical Effects Analysis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Different Dose Paclitaxel on Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma

Ya-juan ZHONG1, Wei ZHANG1(), Wen-ting ZHANG1, Qiong-ying LV1, Jing CHENG1, Kang-kang ZENG1   

  1. 1. Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei Province, China
  • Received:2012-06-19 Revised:2012-10-28 Published:2012-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Wei ZHANG
  • About author:
    (Corresponding author: ZHANG Wei, Email: )
引用本文:

钟亚娟, 张蔚, 张文婷, 吕琼莹, 程静, 曾康康. 不同剂量紫杉醇联合顺铂新辅助化疗对局部ⅠB2~ⅡB期宫颈癌疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2012, 08(06): 729-732.

Ya-juan ZHONG, Wei ZHANG, Wen-ting ZHANG, Qiong-ying LV, Jing CHENG, Kang-kang ZENG. Clinical Effects Analysis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Different Dose Paclitaxel on Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2012, 08(06): 729-732.

目的

探讨不同剂量紫杉醇联合顺铂新辅助化疗对ⅠB2~ⅡB期宫颈癌患者的近期疗效、不良反应及远期疗效。

方法

选择2002年1月至2005年12月在本院就诊并经组织病理学活检确诊为ⅠB2~ⅡB期宫颈癌,并符合本研究纳入标准的60例患者为研究对象。将其随机分为TP1组(n=30,135 mg/m2紫杉醇联合60 mg/m2顺铂)与TP2组(n=30,60 mg/m2紫杉醇联合60 mg/m2顺铂),化疗1~3个疗程;TP1组与TP2组化疗间隔为21 d与10 d;化疗结束后行宫颈癌根治手术。采用统计学方法分析两组近期疗效、不良反应及远期疗效(1,3,5年生存率)(本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象本人的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书)。两组患者年龄、宫颈癌临床分期、宫颈癌病理学类型等比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结果

TP1组的化疗有效率(RR)为83.3%(25/30),TP2组为80.0%(24/30),两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。TP1组白细胞减少发生率(36.7%,11/30)高于TP2组(13.3%,4/30),且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组化疗导致的胃肠道反应、神经毒性及脱发等不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者的1年、3年生存率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而TP2组患者的5年生存率高于TP1组,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

紫杉醇60 mg/m2联合顺铂60 mg/m2的新辅助化疗方案,对治疗局部ⅠB2~ⅡB期宫颈癌效果较好,但是否值得临床广泛推荐,尚需后续多中心、大样本与随访时间更长的随机对照研究进一步研究证实。

Objective

To investigate the curative effects, adverse reactions and forward effects between different dosages paclitaxel of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on locally advanced cervical cancer in stage ⅠB2-ⅡB.

Methods

From January 2002 to December 2005, a total of 60 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer in stage ⅠB2-ⅡB were treated with strategies for deference dosages of taxol plus cisplatin (60 mg/m2) for 1 to 3 courses: Taxol 135 mg/m2, 21 days interval were used in 30 patients(TP1 group), and taxol 60 mg/m2, 10 days interval were used in 30 patients(TP2 group). The curative effects, adverse reactions and forward effect, and one-year, three-year, five-year survival rates between two groups were analysis by statistical methods. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. There had no significance difference between two groups among age, cervical cancer staging, and pathological types of cervical cancer, etc. (P>0.05).

Results

There had no significance difference between TP1 group[83.3%(25/30)] and TP2 group[80.0%(24/30)] in response rate(RR)[RR=complete response(CR)+ partial response(PR)], respectively(P>0.05). Toxicities including gastroenteric, neurotoxicity and alopecia reactions were similar between two groups(P>0.05), however, toxicities of leucopenia was more common in TP1 group(36.7%, 11/30) than that in TP2 group(13.3%, 4/30), there had no significance difference(P<0.05). Subjects in TP2 group and TP1 group whose survival rate of one-year, three-year had no statistically significant(P>0.05), while the five-year survival rates were higher in TP2 group than those in TP1 group (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Taxol (60 mg/m2) plus Cisplatin(60 mg/m2) for 1 to 3 courses with 10 days interval is worth to be recommended in locally advanced cervical cancer.

表1 两组患者的近期疗效指标比较[n(%)]
Table 1 Comparison of indexes of curative effects between two groups[n(%)]
表2 两组采用化疗疗程的患者比例比较[n(%)]
Table 2 Comparison of proportion of patients by periods of chemotherapy between two groups[n(%)]
表3 两组不良反应发生率比较[n(%)]
Table 3 Comparison of rates of adverse reaction between two groups [n(%)]
表4 两组行广泛性全子宫切除术+两侧盆腔淋巴结清除术患者的手术指标比较[n(%)]
Table 4 Comparison of indexes of operations between two groups [n(%)]
表5 两组间的远期疗效比较[n(%)]
Table 5 Comparison of the forward effects between two groups[n(%)]
[1]
Lv J, Liu ZP.Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for cervical cancer[J].Matern Child Health Care China, 2007, 22(12):1704-1706.
[2]
Cao LQ, Li X, Li XG, et al.Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on cervica carcinoma[J].J Cent South Univ:Med Sci, 2009, 34(6):527-530.
[3]
Yamakawa Y, Fujimura M, Hidaka T, et al.Neoadjuvant intraarterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with stage ⅠB2-ⅡB2 cervical cancer[J].Gynecol Oncol, 2007, 77(2):264.
[4]
Liu HL, Yang YQ, Mi RR, et al.Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with different dose taxol for treatment of cervical cancer[J].J Pract Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 24(6):350-352.
[5]
Chen L, Huang L, Zhang LL.Taxanes: Research status and chemotherapy of ovarian cancer[J/CD].Chin J Obstet Gynecol Pediatr:Electron Ed, 2011, (5):488-492.
[6]
Wang JF, Ying JE, Ma SL. Clinical effects analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel on locally advanced esophageal cancer[J].Chin J Cancer Prev Treat, 2007, 14(12):961-962.
[7]
Kelsey CR, Chino JP, Willett CG, et al.Paclitaxe-based chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of patients with operable esophageal cancer[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007, 69(3):770.
[8]
He T, Li XC, Wang Y, et al.Effect of paclitaxel combined with cisplatin in advanced cervicai carcinoma[J]. J Pract Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 25(2):109-111.
[9]
Chen HJ, Liang C, Zhang L, et al.Clinical efficacy of modified preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced(stage ⅠB2 to ⅡB) cervical cancer:randomized study[J].Gynecol Oncol, 2008, 110(3):308-315.
[1] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[2] 赵阳, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 党晓智, 蔡林利, 薛文欣, 李洋, 肖瑶, 郭妤绮, 宋宏萍. 自动乳腺超声联合免疫组化早期预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗病理完全缓解的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(04): 361-369.
[3] 王聪, 李云涛, 唐甜甜, 王鑫蕊, 吕鑫, 范志刚. 多基因检测对激素受体阳性、HER-2阴性乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效预测的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 292-296.
[4] 杨焕, 马靓, 沈俊, 董丽丽, 孙文雯. 乳腺癌新辅助化疗患者支持性照顾需求与症状群及应对方式的相关性[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 224-230.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[6] 刘雯, 赵明栋, 夏伟, 潘以雄. 不同剂量比阿培南治疗重症肺炎的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 789-792.
[7] 张昊, 潘卫东. 胰腺癌新辅助化疗后可切除性评估现状及进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 629-633.
[8] 王军华, 王锐炫. 胰腺癌新辅助化疗现状和治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 640-643.
[9] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[10] 石阳, 于剑锋, 曹可, 翟志伟, 叶春祥, 王振军, 韩加刚. 可扩张金属支架置入联合新辅助化疗治疗完全梗阻性左半结肠癌围手术期并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 464-471.
[11] 梁轩豪, 李小荣, 李亮, 林昌伟. 肠梗阻支架置入术联合新辅助化疗治疗结直肠癌急性肠梗阻的疗效及其预后的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 472-482.
[12] 段伟, 刘飞, 许光源, 程宇豪, 陈星. 食管癌调强放疗计划剂量学参数差异对放射性肺炎发生及严重程度的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 320-324.
[13] 杨菲, 刘腾飞, 赵志军, 李睿聪, 张颉, 刘妍, 赵珍. 血清维生素水平与分化型甲状腺癌的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 633-640.
[14] 张梦婷, 穷拉姆, 色珍, 李逸群, 德庆旺姆. 西藏地区藏族乳腺癌新辅助化疗的真实世界研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-446.
[15] 赵阳, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 党晓智, 蔡林利, 薛文欣, 李洋, 肖瑶, 郭妤绮, 宋宏萍. 基于自动乳腺超声的列线图模型早期预测HER-2阳性乳腺癌新辅助化疗病理完全缓解的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 355-362.
阅读次数
全文


摘要