切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2011, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (06) : 527 -530. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2011.06.003

论著

是否接受常规提供孕产期人类免疫缺陷病毒抗体筛查孕产妇的感染水平探索
邱琇, 王临虹, 方利文, 乔亚萍, 孙江平   
  1. 510623 广州,广州市妇女儿童医疗中心
    100050 北京,中国疾病预防控制中心妇幼保健中心妇女保健部
    中国疾病预防控制中心性病艾滋病预防控制中心
  • 出版日期:2011-12-01

Discussion of the Feasible Prevalence of Providing the Routine Human Immunodeficiency Virus Screening in Pregnant Women

Xiu QIU, Lin-hong WANG, Li-wen FANG, Ya-ping QIAO, Jiang-ping SUN   

  1. Women's Health Department of Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou 510623, China
  • Published:2011-12-01
  • Supported by:
    * Project No. 2004BA719A03, supported by the 10th National Five-Year key technologies R&D program; project No. WA2005-03, supported by the Ministry of Health Research Fund
引用本文:

邱琇, 王临虹, 方利文, 乔亚萍, 孙江平. 是否接受常规提供孕产期人类免疫缺陷病毒抗体筛查孕产妇的感染水平探索[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2011, 07(06): 527-530.

Xiu QIU, Lin-hong WANG, Li-wen FANG, Ya-ping QIAO, Jiang-ping SUN. Discussion of the Feasible Prevalence of Providing the Routine Human Immunodeficiency Virus Screening in Pregnant Women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2011, 07(06): 527-530.

目的

对4个艾滋病(AIDS)高发县级市的预防AIDS母婴传播综合措施进行成本-效益评价,探讨适宜提供孕产期人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)抗体筛查的孕产妇感染水平。

方法

运用项目全成本核算的角度,通过现场调查收集2003至2006年实施预防AIDS母婴传播各项措施的费用和干预效果,计算实现项目费用与通过避免儿童感染HIV所挽回的经济损失相等时的孕产妇HIV感染水平。

结果

以项目全成本的角度分析,以地区经济水平衡量,孕产期HIV感染率为0.0596%时,项目成本效益相等;如按全国人均国内生产总值计算,则人群感染率在0.036%时开展筛查,项目成本-效益守恒。

结论

应适时扩大我国孕产期HIV抗体筛查服务。

Objective

To discuss the feasible prevalence of providing the routine human immunodeficiency virus(HIV) screening in pregnant women by evaluating the cost-benefits of integrated prevention of mother-to-child transmission(PMTCT) of HIV in four high-incidence counties.

Methods

Data of local resource investment and total cost for PMTCT in 4 counties in China from 2003-2006 were collected. Cost analysis and cost-benefits analysis were conduct. The feasible prevalence was obtained when the economic save and the cost of the programme was equal.

Results

The feasible HIV prevalence for HIV screening in pregnant women was 0.0596% and 0.036% depending on local and national GDP, respectively, base on total cost perspective.

Conclusion

It is time for China to scale up the HIV screening service in pregnant women.

1 Gui XE, Luo JL,Zhuang K. The survey of HIV transmutation among the family [J]. Chin J Epidemiol,2003,24:396.[桂希恩,骆嘉拉,庄柯.艾滋病病毒家庭内传播的调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2003,24:396.]
2 Wunder D, Evison JM. Antiretroviral therapy and pregnancy[J]. Ther Umsch, 2005,62(1):37-42.
3 Guo Jm, Wang YM, Wang ZY,et al. Analysis on AIDS-associated social economic burden in countryside with high-incidence of AIDS[J].Chin J public Health,2006,22:998-1000.[郭金玲,王宇明,王仲阳,等.农村艾滋病高发地区社会疾病经济负担分析[J].中国公共卫生,2006,22:998-1000.]
4 Murray DJ, Lopez AD. The global burden of disease: A comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020[M]. Boston: Harvard University Press,1996,10-15.
5 Marseille E.,J. G. Kahn, R. Mmiro, et al. Cost-effectiveness of single-dose nevirapine regimen for mothers and babies to decrease vertical HIV-1 transmission in Sub-Saharan Africa [J]. Lancet, 1999,354(9181):803-809.
6 Dai ZC. Global and China HIV/AIDS epidemic and prevention and control strategy[J]. Chin J School Health,2005,26(1):84-88.[戴志澄.全球/中国HIV/AIDS流行状况及预防与控制策略[J].中国学校卫生,2005,26(1):84-88.]
7 Postma MJ, Beck EJ, Mandalia S, et al. Universal HIV screening of pregnant women in England: Cost effectiveness analysis [J]. Br Med J, 1999,318:1656-1660.
8 Immergluch LC, Cull WL, Schwartz A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of universal compared with voluntary screening for human immunodeficiency virus among pregnant women in Chicago [J]. Pediatrics, 2000, 105:E54.
9 Bramley D, Graves N, Walker D. The cost effectiveness of universal antenatal screening for HIV in New Zealand [J]. AIDS, 2003, 17:741-748.
10 Graves N, Walker DG, McDonald AM, et al. Would universal antenatal screening for HIV infection be cost-effective in a setting of very low prevalence? Modelling the data for Australia [J]. J Infect Dis 2004, 190:166-174.
[1] 李春静, 张明帅, 彭卫, 付晓莹, 刘雪珍, 曹春燕, 任雅坤, 李洪娟, 赖丽思, 郑维. 巨大乳腺癌伴人免疫缺陷病毒感染一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 319-321.
[2] 吴令杰, 陈瑞烈, 陈桂佳, 肖湘明, 林钟滨. 两例获得性免疫缺陷综合征合并新型冠状病毒感染者抗病毒治疗并文献复习[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 282-286.
[3] 李玉静, 陈七一, 谢汝明, 陈步东. 获得性免疫缺陷综合征相关原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的预后研究[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 200-208.
[4] 朱晓红, 周诗梦, 朱晓霞, 邹美银. 壳聚糖修饰的聚乳酸-羟基乙酸共聚物纳米颗粒在控制释放抗人类免疫缺陷病毒药物传递中的应用[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 125-132.
[5] 袁瑞, 胡文佳, 桂希恩, 严亚军, 冯玲, 柯亨宁, 熊勇, 杨蓉蓉. 淋巴细胞精细分型检测在人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者/获得性免疫缺陷综合征患者中的应用[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 84-91.
[6] 王彤彤, 朱春雨, 刘颖楚, 郜桂菊. 复方磺胺甲噁唑治疗获得性免疫缺陷综合征合并肺孢子菌肺炎现状及其肝功能损伤机制[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 79-83.
[7] 王延雪, 胡虹英, 李新刚, 鹿星梦. 获得性免疫缺陷综合征患者免疫重建炎症综合征相关Graves’病5例并文献复习[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 65-70.
[8] 李倩, 邓莉平, 陈果, 张忠威, 莫平征, 胡文佳, 陈良君, 张捷, 张永喜, 杨蓉蓉, 熊勇. 宏基因组二代测序在获得性免疫缺陷综合征合并中枢神经系统感染中的临床应用[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 24-31.
[9] 董愉, 柳月红, 许雪静, 刘彬彬. 免散瞳超广角激光扫描检眼镜在获得性免疫缺陷综合征患者眼底病筛查中的优势[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 344-347.
[10] 魏春波, 万钢, 许东梅, 赵兴云, 袁柳凤, 吴焱, 伦文辉. 60例人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者/获得性免疫缺陷综合征合并神经梅毒患者临床和实验室特征[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 254-260.
[11] 田飞, 高颂, 李铮, 王颖慧, 王媛媛. 1989至2020年北京市东城区1 076例人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者/获得性免疫缺陷综合征患者生存时间及影响因素[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 100-107.
[12] 陈彩玲, 吉金峰, 王玉红, 徐静, 朱湘安, 李伟, 郝喜燕, 李爱琴. 新冠肺炎疫情防控期间急诊腹部多发伤一体化救治管理及对策[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 560-563.
[13] 万顷, 邓先锐, 何婷, 郑磊, 陈虹豆, 王永. 腹腔镜与开放腹膜前疝修补手术治疗成人腹股沟疝的成本效益分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 91-95.
[14] 李玉娟, 潘蕾, 鱼高乐, 代川川, 南岩东, 金发光. 获得性免疫缺陷综合征并发卡氏肺孢子菌肺炎一例报告[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 600-602.
[15] 万秋, 唐莉歆. 获得性免疫缺陷综合征合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病的研究进展[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(01): 129-131.
阅读次数
全文


摘要