切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2011, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 338 -340. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2011.04.015

论著

两种微创术式剥除子宫肌瘤的临床疗效观察
林素兰   
  1. 629000 四川遂宁,遂宁市第一人民医院妇产科
  • 出版日期:2011-08-01

Observation of Clinical Efficacy of Two Minimally Invasive Myomectomys

Su-lan LIN   

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Suining First People's Hospital, Suining 629000, Sichuan Province, China
  • Published:2011-08-01
引用本文:

林素兰. 两种微创术式剥除子宫肌瘤的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2011, 07(04): 338-340.

Su-lan LIN. Observation of Clinical Efficacy of Two Minimally Invasive Myomectomys[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2011, 07(04): 338-340.

目的

探讨阴式子宫肌瘤剥除术及腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剥除术两种微创术式剥除子宫肌瘤的临床效果。

方法

选择2007年1月至2010年4月在本院确诊为子宫肌瘤,有手术适应证,要求保留子宫的95例患者为研究对象。按照患者自愿和配对选择方式,即入组条件相似的配对原则,将其分为阴式子宫肌瘤剥除组(n=50)与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剥除组(n=45),对两种术式进行对比分析(手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、术后疼痛率、术后病率及住院时间)。两组患者一般资料(年龄、孕次、产次、肌瘤个数和子宫肌瘤直径)比较,差异无显著意义(P>0.05) (本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象本人的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书)。

结果

两组手术持续时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、术后疼痛率、术后病率和住院时间等比较,差异有显著意义(P<0.05)。

结论

在一定适应证下,阴式子宫肌瘤剥除术较腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剥除术具有手术时间短,术后疼痛轻,肠功能恢复快,体表不留疤痕和住院时间短等优点。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical effects of two myomectomys by vaginal myomectomy and by laparoscopic surgery.

Methods

From January 2007 to April 2010, 95 cases with hysteromyoma were included into this study. They were divided into vaginal myomectomy group (n=50) and laparoscopic myomectomy group (n=45) according to the principle of similar condition. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Beings of Suining First People's Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. There had no significant difference between two groups among ages, gravidities, parities, hysteromyoma pieces and diameter hysteromyoma, etc (P>0.05).

Results

There had significant difference of duration of operation, blood loss, anal exhaust time, rates of postoperative pain, postoperative morbidity, hospital stay between two groups (P<0.05).

Conclusion

In certain indications, the vaginal myomectomys was done with shorter operative time, postoperative pain, faster recovery of intestinal function, the body surface without leaving scars, shorter hospital stay than the laparoscopy.

1 Wang SL. Myoma of uterus and adenomyisis [M].Beijing:People's Military Medical Press, 2007, 96.[王世阆.子宫肌瘤与子宫腺肌病[M].人民军医出版社,2007,96.]
2 Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain[J].Lancet, 1974,2:1127-1131.
3 Liu XC, Xie QH, Chen L, et al. The 50 cases clinical analysis of vaginal myomectomy [J]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 37: 565-566 [柳晓春,谢庆煌,陈龙,等.经阴道子宫肌瘤剔除术50例临床分析.中华妇产科杂志,2002,37:565-566.]
4 Lv QB, Wang SW, Zhang Y, et al. The clinical study of vaginal myomectomy [J]. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet, 2005, 21(1): 49-50. [吕秋波,王少为,张毅,等.阴式子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床研究[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(1):49-50.]
5 Baker CM,Winkel CA,Subram AS, et al. Estimated costs for uterine artery embolisation and abdominal myom ectomy for uterine leiomyomata: A comparative study at a single institution [J]. J Vase Interv Radiol, 2002,13:1207-1210.
6 Chen YQ. The Present situation and prospect of the transvaginal hysterectomy surgery [J]. J Pract Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 23(1): 4. [陈亚琼.经阴道子宫手术的现状及前景[J].实用妇产科杂志,2007,23(1):4.]
7 Huang JS. The clinical diagnostics and therapeutics of gynecologic laparoscopy [M]. Guangzhou: Scientific and Technological Press of Guangdong Province, 2002, 137-138. [黄建昭.临床妇科腹腔镜诊疗学[M].广州:广东科学技术出版社,2002, 137-138.]
8 Leng JH, Lang JH, Liu ZF, et al. Analysis of laparoscopic myomectomy[J]. Curr Adv Obstet Gynecol,2000, 9(6): 408. [冷金花,郎景和,刘珠风,等.腹腔镜行子宫肌瘤切除术的分析[J].现代妇产科进展,2000, 9(6): 408.]
9 Zhu JP, Wu D. A study comparing transvaginal myomectomy and laparoscopic myomectomy [J]. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet, 2008, 24(1): 56-57. [朱金萍,吴丹.经阴道与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术的对比分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2008, 24(1): 56-57.]
10 Rovio PH, Heinonen PK. Transvaginal myomectomy with screw traction bycolpotomy [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2006, 273(4): 211-215.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要