切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2011, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 338 -340. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2011.04.015

论著

两种微创术式剥除子宫肌瘤的临床疗效观察
林素兰   
  1. 629000 四川遂宁,遂宁市第一人民医院妇产科
  • 出版日期:2011-08-01

Observation of Clinical Efficacy of Two Minimally Invasive Myomectomys

Su-lan LIN   

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Suining First People's Hospital, Suining 629000, Sichuan Province, China
  • Published:2011-08-01
引用本文:

林素兰. 两种微创术式剥除子宫肌瘤的临床疗效观察[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2011, 07(04): 338-340.

Su-lan LIN. Observation of Clinical Efficacy of Two Minimally Invasive Myomectomys[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2011, 07(04): 338-340.

目的

探讨阴式子宫肌瘤剥除术及腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剥除术两种微创术式剥除子宫肌瘤的临床效果。

方法

选择2007年1月至2010年4月在本院确诊为子宫肌瘤,有手术适应证,要求保留子宫的95例患者为研究对象。按照患者自愿和配对选择方式,即入组条件相似的配对原则,将其分为阴式子宫肌瘤剥除组(n=50)与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剥除组(n=45),对两种术式进行对比分析(手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、术后疼痛率、术后病率及住院时间)。两组患者一般资料(年龄、孕次、产次、肌瘤个数和子宫肌瘤直径)比较,差异无显著意义(P>0.05) (本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象本人的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书)。

结果

两组手术持续时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间、术后疼痛率、术后病率和住院时间等比较,差异有显著意义(P<0.05)。

结论

在一定适应证下,阴式子宫肌瘤剥除术较腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剥除术具有手术时间短,术后疼痛轻,肠功能恢复快,体表不留疤痕和住院时间短等优点。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical effects of two myomectomys by vaginal myomectomy and by laparoscopic surgery.

Methods

From January 2007 to April 2010, 95 cases with hysteromyoma were included into this study. They were divided into vaginal myomectomy group (n=50) and laparoscopic myomectomy group (n=45) according to the principle of similar condition. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Beings of Suining First People's Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. There had no significant difference between two groups among ages, gravidities, parities, hysteromyoma pieces and diameter hysteromyoma, etc (P>0.05).

Results

There had significant difference of duration of operation, blood loss, anal exhaust time, rates of postoperative pain, postoperative morbidity, hospital stay between two groups (P<0.05).

Conclusion

In certain indications, the vaginal myomectomys was done with shorter operative time, postoperative pain, faster recovery of intestinal function, the body surface without leaving scars, shorter hospital stay than the laparoscopy.

1 Wang SL. Myoma of uterus and adenomyisis [M].Beijing:People's Military Medical Press, 2007, 96.[王世阆.子宫肌瘤与子宫腺肌病[M].人民军医出版社,2007,96.]
2 Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain[J].Lancet, 1974,2:1127-1131.
3 Liu XC, Xie QH, Chen L, et al. The 50 cases clinical analysis of vaginal myomectomy [J]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 37: 565-566 [柳晓春,谢庆煌,陈龙,等.经阴道子宫肌瘤剔除术50例临床分析.中华妇产科杂志,2002,37:565-566.]
4 Lv QB, Wang SW, Zhang Y, et al. The clinical study of vaginal myomectomy [J]. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet, 2005, 21(1): 49-50. [吕秋波,王少为,张毅,等.阴式子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床研究[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(1):49-50.]
5 Baker CM,Winkel CA,Subram AS, et al. Estimated costs for uterine artery embolisation and abdominal myom ectomy for uterine leiomyomata: A comparative study at a single institution [J]. J Vase Interv Radiol, 2002,13:1207-1210.
6 Chen YQ. The Present situation and prospect of the transvaginal hysterectomy surgery [J]. J Pract Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 23(1): 4. [陈亚琼.经阴道子宫手术的现状及前景[J].实用妇产科杂志,2007,23(1):4.]
7 Huang JS. The clinical diagnostics and therapeutics of gynecologic laparoscopy [M]. Guangzhou: Scientific and Technological Press of Guangdong Province, 2002, 137-138. [黄建昭.临床妇科腹腔镜诊疗学[M].广州:广东科学技术出版社,2002, 137-138.]
8 Leng JH, Lang JH, Liu ZF, et al. Analysis of laparoscopic myomectomy[J]. Curr Adv Obstet Gynecol,2000, 9(6): 408. [冷金花,郎景和,刘珠风,等.腹腔镜行子宫肌瘤切除术的分析[J].现代妇产科进展,2000, 9(6): 408.]
9 Zhu JP, Wu D. A study comparing transvaginal myomectomy and laparoscopic myomectomy [J]. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet, 2008, 24(1): 56-57. [朱金萍,吴丹.经阴道与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术的对比分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2008, 24(1): 56-57.]
10 Rovio PH, Heinonen PK. Transvaginal myomectomy with screw traction bycolpotomy [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2006, 273(4): 211-215.
[1] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[2] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[3] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[4] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[5] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[6] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[7] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[8] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[9] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[10] 李三祥, 李佳, 刘俊峰, 吕东晨, 方晖东, 谭朝晖, 刘杰, 潘佐, 乔建坤. 基于CT影像的三维重建成像技术在腹腔镜大肾上腺肿瘤切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 570-574.
[11] 赵佳晖, 王永兴, 彭涛, 李明川, 魏德超, 韩毅力, 侯铸, 姜永光, 罗勇. 后腹腔镜根治性肾切除手术时间延长和术中出血量增多的影响因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 575-580.
[12] 汪帮琦, 陈波特, 林浩坚, 许晖阳, 王镇伟, 袁雪峰, 林康健, 邱晓拂. 经腹入路3D腹腔镜联合输尿管硬镜同期处理肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻并肾盏结石的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 597-600.
[13] 马涛, 叶春伟, 刘滔, 彭文希, 李志鹏. 腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
[14] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[15] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
阅读次数
全文


摘要