切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2011, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (01) : 26 -29. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2011.01.007

论著

体外受精-胚胎移植中影响胚胎种植因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析
龚瑜, 白晓红, 吕睿, 宋学茹, 随笑琳, 赵晓徽   
  1. 300052 天津,天津医科大学总医院妇产科生殖中心
  • 出版日期:2011-02-01

Multiple-factor Non-conditional Logistic Regression Analysis of Influential Factors on Embryo Implantation of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer

Yu GONG, Xiao-hong BAI, Rui LV, Xue-ru SONG, Xiao-lin SUI, Xiao-hui ZHAO   

  1. IVF Center of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
  • Published:2011-02-01
引用本文:

龚瑜, 白晓红, 吕睿, 宋学茹, 随笑琳, 赵晓徽. 体外受精-胚胎移植中影响胚胎种植因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2011, 07(01): 26-29.

Yu GONG, Xiao-hong BAI, Rui LV, Xue-ru SONG, Xiao-lin SUI, Xiao-hui ZHAO. Multiple-factor Non-conditional Logistic Regression Analysis of Influential Factors on Embryo Implantation of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2011, 07(01): 26-29.

目的

探讨体外受精-胚胎移植(in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer,IVF-ET)中影响胚胎种植(embryo transfer,ET)的相关因素。

方法

选择2007年1月至2009年9月在本中心接受体外受精-胚胎移植和精子卵浆内注射(intracytoplasmic sperm injection,ICSI)治疗患者中,分别选择胚胎种植率为100%,即妊娠胎数等于移植胚胎数的治疗周期47个纳入种植组(n=47);种植率为0,治疗周期为131个纳入未种植组(n=131)。以胚胎种植与否为独立变量,以患者年龄、不孕病因、使用外源性促性腺激素(gonadotropin,Gn)量、注射子宫内膜厚度[注射人绒毛膜促性腺激素(human chorionic gonadotrophin, hCG)日测定]、卵子数、体外受精方式、受精率、正常受精率、多精率、优质胚胎率、胚胎移植时间(月经周期)、移植胚胎卵裂球数及其碎片为非独立变量,采用多因素非条件logistic回归分析影响胚胎种植的相关因素(本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象本人的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书)。

结果

最终进入logistic回归模型的变量为年龄(OR=0.844,95%CI 23.10~35.44)、正常受精率(OR=1.019,95%CI 46.95~100)、优质胚胎率(OR=1.018,95%CI 28.18~100)、胚胎移植时间(OR=1.143,95%CI 8.03~29.09)和移植胚胎卵裂球数(OR=2.840,95%CI 6.78~8.86)。在一定范围内(95%CI),患者年龄每增加1岁,胚胎种植率下降15.6%;正常受精率每增加1.0%,胚胎种植率增加1.9%;优质胚胎率每增加1.0%,胚胎种植率增加1.8%;胚胎移植时间每增加1 d,胚胎种植率增加14.3%;移植胚胎卵裂球数每增加1个,细胞胚胎种植率增加184.0%。

结论

体外受精-胚胎移植技术中的患者年龄、正常受精率、优质胚胎率、胚胎移植时间(月经周期)、移植胚胎卵裂球数可影响胚胎的种植。

Objective

To investigate influential factors on embryo transfer (ET) of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET).

Methods

From January 2007 to September 2009, people who were received in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were recruited into this study. They were divided into two groups according to implantation rate, implanted group (implantation rate was 100%, n=47) and non-implanted group (implantation rate was 0, n=131). Influential factors on embryo implantation were analyzed by multivariate non-conditional logistic regression analysis by choosing whether embryo implantation or not as the independent variable and age, pathogeny, gonadotropin (Gn) dose, thickness of endometrim [at the day of injecting human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG)], number of oocytes, in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, fertilization rate, normal fertilization rate, poly spermic fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, embryo transfer time (menstrual cycle), and cell number of embryo transfer and fragment on embryo implantation as the independent variable. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Results

Variables in the equation of logistic regression were age (OR=0.844, 95%CI 23.10-35.44), normal fertilization rate (OR=1.019, 95%CI 46.95-100.00), high-quality embryo rate(OR=1.018, 95%CI 28.18-100.00), embryo transfer time (menstrual cycle) (OR=1.143, 95%CI 8.03-29.09), cell number of embryo transferred (OR=1.775, 95%CI 6.78-8.86). Within a certain extent (95%CI), embryo implantation rate decreased 15.6% when the age with additional 1 year; normal fertilization rate increased by 1.0% when embryo implantation rate increased by 1.9%; embryo implantation rate increased by 1.8% when high-quality embryo rate increased by 1.0%; implantation rate increased by 14.3% when embryo transfer time with additional 1 d; cell implantation rate increased by 184.0% when the cell number of embryo transferred increased by 1.

Conclusion

Age, normal fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, embryo transfer time (menstrual cycle), cell number of embryo transferred are the influential factors on embryo implantation of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.

1 Fang JQ, ed. Statistics [M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2006, 59. [方积乾,主编. 卫生统计学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2006, 59.]
2 Zhu GJ, Jin L, Zhang HW, et al. Clinical analysis about 1807 cycles of In-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer[J]. J Reprod Med, 2004,13(1): 25-28. [朱桂金,靳镭,章汉旺,等.体外受精-胚胎移植1807周期临床分析[J]. 生殖医学杂志,2004,13(1): 25-28].
3 Zhuang GL, ed. Modern assisted reproductive technology [M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2005, 165. [庄广伦,主编. 现代辅助生殖技术[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2005, 165.]
4 Coco C, Jeanty P. Isolated fetal pyelectasis and chromosomal abnormalities[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 193: 732-738.
5 Lukassen HG, Braat DD, Wetzels AM, et al. Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: A randomized controlled trail[J]. Hum Reprod, 2005, 20(3): 702-708.
6 Veleva Z, Vilska S, Hyden-Granskog C, et al. Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years[J]. Hum Reprod, 2006, 21(9): 2098-2010.
[1] 刘嘉嘉, 王承华, 陈绪娇, 刘瑗玲, 王善钰, 屈海花, 张莉. 经阴道子宫-输卵管实时三维超声造影中患者疼痛发生情况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 959-965.
[2] 高玲, 于哲, 范然, 臧银善. 外周血细胞计数比值评估类风湿关节炎疗效的价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 642-647.
[3] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[4] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[5] 王鹏, 肖厚安, 贾赤宇. 不同因素调控巨噬细胞极化在慢性难愈性创面中的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 454-459.
[6] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[7] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[8] 黄汇, 朱信强. 131I治疗45岁以下分化型甲状腺癌的疗效及影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 627-630.
[9] 王帆, 马秋月, 刘小莉. 基于分位数回归模型的切口疝手术患者住院费用影响因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 522-529.
[10] 林静, 陈芳, 刘小霞. COPD患者认知功能障碍影响因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 569-571.
[11] 汪俊谷, 潘华琴, 杨雨田. HFNC治疗急性低氧性呼吸衰竭插管预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 523-525.
[12] 顾娇娇, 邹燕, 陈奕辰, 黄师菊, 张慧玲, 林楠. 基于简易营养评价精法评估肝癌患者出院后营养状况及其影响因素[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 534-539.
[13] 杨静, 顾红叶, 赵莹莹, 孙梦霞, 查园园, 王琪. 老年血液透析患者短期死亡的影响因素及列线图预测模型的预测作用[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 254-259.
[14] 刘代江, 蒋俊艳, 万晓强, 马莎英. 结直肠癌肝转移患者生存状况及预后影响因素分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 284-288.
[15] 杜振双, 胡清福, 林颖艺, 张月霞, 陈美丽, 李祎祺, 王振华. 社区全科医师激励机制的影响因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 876-883.
阅读次数
全文


摘要