切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2008, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (06) : 571 -574. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2008.06.113

论著

非脱垂阴式全子宫切除术的临床研究
刘晋英   
  1. 广州市天河区妇幼保健院(广州,510630)
  • 出版日期:2008-12-01

The Exploration on the Practicability Value of Trans-Vaginal Hysterectomy

Jin-ying LIU   

  1. Tianhe Area Women's and Children's Clinic, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Published:2008-12-01
引用本文:

刘晋英. 非脱垂阴式全子宫切除术的临床研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2008, 04(06): 571-574.

Jin-ying LIU. The Exploration on the Practicability Value of Trans-Vaginal Hysterectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2008, 04(06): 571-574.

目的

探讨非脱垂阴式子宫切除术的临床应用价值。

方法

以2004年1月至2007年1月本院收治的有子宫切除指征的患者136例为研究对象[年龄为45~64岁,孕、产次为(2. 85±1. 03)次、(2. 32 ±1.12)次],按患者意愿将其分为两组(本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组取得受试对象的知情同意,并与患者签署临床研究知情同意书),分别采取阴式全子宫切除术(trans-vaginal hysterectomy,TVH)和腹式全子宫切除术(trans-abdominal hysterectomy,TAH)。阴式全子宫切除术组(TVH组,n=60)采用阴式子宫切除术,其中子宫体积≤10孕周为43例,10~14孕周为17例;有下腹部手术史为15例。腹式全子宫切除术组(TAH组,n=86),采用腹式子宫切除术,其中子宫体积≤10孕周为65例,10 ~14孕周为21例;有下腹部手术史为20例。两组患者年龄,孕、产次子宫大小,有无下腹部手术史等比较,差异无显著意义。观察、比较两组的手术持续时间、术中出血量、术中并发症、术后肛门排气时间、术后下床活动时间、住院时间、切口感染率等。

结果

TVH组手术持续时间较TAH组明显缩短,差异有显著意义(t=- 5. 11,P<0. 01);TVH组术中出血量较少,两组比较,差异有显著意义(t=- 3. 08,P<0. 05)。术后TVH组肛门排气时间早、下床活动时间快、切口感染率较低,两组比较,差异有显著意义(t=-2. 34,P<0. 05;t=-4. 52,P<0. 01; χ2=-2. 30,P<0. 05);两组住院费用比较,差异无显著意义。两组均无手术并发症发生,手术顺利。

结论

阴式全子宫切除术术中、术后患者情况均优于腹式全子宫切除术,是全子宫切除较好的微创术式。

Objective

To explore the clinic value of trans-vaginal hysterectomy.

Methods

From January 2004 to January 2007, 136 hospitalized patients with signs of hysterectomy were divided into trans-vaginal hysterectomy group(TVH group, n= 60)and trans-abdominal hysterectomy group(TAH group, n= 86)according to their choices. Informed consent were obtained from all patients. Sixty cases in the TVH group were all received trans-vaginal hysterectomy, including 43 cases with uterine volume lower than 10 gestational weeks, and 17 cases during 10~14 gestational weeks; and 15 case had operation history. Eighty-six cases in the TAH group were all received trans-abdominal hysterectomy, including 65 cases with uterine volume lower than 10 gestational weeks, and 21 case during 10~14 gestational weeks; and 20 cases had operation history. The following items were compared between two groups, operative duration, blood loss, intraoperative complication, post-surgery anal-exsufflation time, postoperative activity out of bed days, hospitalization time and rate of wound infection.

Results

In terms of the operative duration and intraoperative blood loss, the TVH group were significantly lower than those in the TAH group(t=-5. 11, P<0. 01 ; t=-0. 38, P<0. 05). Furthermore, compared with the items of post-surgery anal-exsufflation time, postoperative activity out of bed days, and wound infection rate, two groups had significant differences(t=-2. 34, P<0. 05; t=-2. 30, P<0. 05; χ2=-2. 30, P<0. 05). There had no significant difference of hospitalization expenses between two groups. All the operations were smoothly completed without any complication.

Conclusion

The trans-vaginal hysterectomy is an applicable minimal invasive operative method, which has better effects than trans-abdominal hysterectomy,

图1 两组患者手术持续时间比较
1 Agostini A, Bretelle F,Cravello L, et al. Vaginal hysterectomy in nulliparous women without prolapse. A prospective comparative study. BJOG, 2000, 110(5):515-518.
2 Ottosen C,Lingman G,Ottosen L. Three methods for hysterectomy:A randomised, prospective study of short term outcome. BJOG, 2000,107(11):1380-1385.
3 LI GY,Shang HL, Chen LS. Analysis of operative patterns of 2 272 laparoscopic hysterectomies. Chin J Obstet Gynecol,2005,40(3):168-170.[李光仪,尚慧玲,陈露诗.腹腔镜下不同子宫切除术2 272例分析.中华妇产科杂志,2005,40(3):168-170.]
4 Chen L, Liu XC,Xie QH. Clinical analysis of trans-vaginal hysterectomy for 644 large volume, non-prolapse uterus. J Pract Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 20(6):360-361.[陈龙,柳晓春,谢庆煌.644例非脱垂大子宫经阴道切除临床总结分析.实用妇产科杂志,2004,20(6):360-361.]
5 Liu P. A comparison of therapeutic effects between trans-vaginal hysterectomy and trans-abdominal hysterectomy for nonprolapsed uterus. Anhui Med Pharmaceut J, 2008,12(11):1058-1060.[刘萍.非脱垂子宫经阴道切除与经腹切除临床效果对比.安徽医学,2008,12(11):1058-1060.]
6 Ma QL, Zhu XJ,Zhang Y. Clinical evaluation of non-vaginal prolapse and uterine scar abdominal hysterectomy. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet, 2005,21(3):171-172.[马庆良,朱雪静,张羽.非脱垂瘢痕子宫阴式和腹式全切术临床评价.中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(3):171-172.]
7 Liang ZQ. To deal with in the laparoscopic gynecological cancer treatment and its indications and complications. Chin J Obs/Gyne&Pediatr(Electronic Version), 2006, 2(2):241-245.[梁志清.腹腔镜在妇科恶性肿瘤治疗中的适应证和并发症及其处理.中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2006,9(2):241-245.]
8 Arbel R,Lavy Y. Vaginal vault prolapse:Choice of operation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2005,19(6):959-977.
9 Maher C,Baessler K,Glazener CM, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2004,(4):CD004014.
10 Kovac SR. Clinical opinion:Guidelines for hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 191(2): 635-640.
[1] 胡辉权, 章庆华, 方玲辉. 非脱垂子宫阴式切除术120例临床观察[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2007, 03(06): 329-330.
[2] 戴文娟, 陆建红, 李加芬. 人文医疗在阴式全子宫切除术联合阴道后壁修补术治疗子宫脱垂合并肠疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 71-75.
阅读次数
全文


摘要