切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2008, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (03) : 176 -180. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2008.03.103

论著

视听整合持续作业测试在注意缺陷多动障碍诊断中的作用
赵夏薇, 毛萌, 杨速飞, 杨慧明   
  1. 四川大学华西第二医院儿科(成都,610041)
  • 出版日期:2008-06-01

The Role of Integrated Visual and Audio Continuous Performance Test on the Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Xia-wei ZHAO, Meng MAO, Su-fei YANG, Hui-ming YANG   

  1. West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Published:2008-06-01
  • Supported by:
    * Project No.2006Z09-041, supported by the Science and Technology Key Project in Sichuan Province
引用本文:

赵夏薇, 毛萌, 杨速飞, 杨慧明. 视听整合持续作业测试在注意缺陷多动障碍诊断中的作用[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2008, 04(03): 176-180.

Xia-wei ZHAO, Meng MAO, Su-fei YANG, Hui-ming YANG. The Role of Integrated Visual and Audio Continuous Performance Test on the Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2008, 04(03): 176-180.

目的

探讨视听整合持续作业测试(integrated visual and audio continuous performance test,IVA-CPT)在注意缺陷多动障碍(attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADHD)诊断中的作用。

方法

本研究以2007年5月至2007年11月在本院确诊为注意缺陷多动障碍的60例(病例组)和有相似主诉,但排除注意缺陷多动障碍的41例(对照组)(分组征得患儿家属的知情同意),共计101例为研究对象。同时,进行视听整合持续作业测试,比较两组结果。

结果

在视听整合持续作业测试判断标准第1、第2条中用到的参数:综合尺度反应控制商数、综合尺度注意力商数、听觉反应控制商数、视觉反应控制商数、听觉注意力商数、视觉注意力商数、多动商数、理解力商数,两组比较,病例组均显著低于对照组,差异有显著意义。按照视听整合持续作业测试全部3条标准判断结果,诊断注意缺陷多动障碍的灵敏度为78.33%,特异度为56.10%;按照其中第1、第2条标准判断结果,灵敏度为73.33%,特异度为75.61%。

结论

视听整合持续作业测试的部分参数:综合尺度反应控制商数、综合尺度注意力商数、听觉反应控制商数、视觉反应控制商数、听觉注意力商数、视觉注意力商数、多动商数、理解力商数,能有效区分注意缺陷多动障碍和有相似症状而非注意缺陷多动障碍的儿童,其第1、第2条判断标准与临床诊断有较高一致性,参考价值较好。

Objective

To investigate the effect of integrated visual and audio continuous performance test(IVA-CPT) on the diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Methods

From May 2007 to November 2007, children with alike symptoms of attention deficit and/or hyperactivity disorder children were divided into the test group and the control group(treatment in West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University). The test group was diagnosed as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder according to the standard of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Ⅳ. The suspected subjects look-alike symptoms but not attention deficit hyperactivity disorder were the control group. Both of them were accepted to the integrated visual and audio continuous performance test.

Results

The parameters including full scale response control quotient(FRCQ), full scale attention quotient(FAQ), auditory response control quotient(ARCQ), visual response control quotient(VRCQ), auditory attention quotient(AAQ), visual attention quotient(VAQ), hyperactivity quotient(HYP), comprehension quotient(COM) of integrated visual and audio continuous performance test of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder group (the test group) were significantly lower than those of the control group. If judged by all that 3 judgment items of integrated visual and audio continuous performance test, the sensitivity was 78.33%, the specificity was 56.10%. If judged by the first and the second item of judgments, the sensitivity was 73.33%, the specificity was 75.61%.

Conclusion

The parameters including full scale response control quotient(FRCQ), full scale attention quotient(FAQ), auditory response control quotient(ARCQ), visual response control quotient(VRCQ), auditory attention quotient(AAQ), visual attention quotient(VAQ), hyperactivity quotient(HYP), comprehension quotient(COM)of integrated visual and audio continuous performance test can effectively differentiate children with or without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The first and second item of judgments are highly accordance with clinic diagnosis, which would be valuated as a reference.

1 American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.4th edition.(DSM-4).Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association,1994,100-105.
2 Cho SC, Kim BN, Jung DS, et al.Temperament and character pattern of ADHD in a community. J Korean Acad Child Adoles Psychiatr,2006,17(2):124-130.
3 Hong KE, Kim JH, Shin MS,et al. Diagnostic classification and assessment of psychiatrically referred children with inattention or hyperactivity as chief complaints. J Korean Acad Child Adoles Psychiatr,1996,7:190-202.
4 张静萍,于爱萍.合肥市学龄儿童多动症患病情况.疾病控制杂志,2000,4(3):262-263.
5 唐江萍,涂健,曹光华等.长沙市部分中小学和幼儿园儿童多动症调查分析.湖南医学,1998,15(3):185-186.
6 林玉霖,庄惠昌,郑玉涛.莆田县学龄儿童多动症调查分析.福建医药杂志,1999,21(4):105-107.
7 姜华,顾立铭,古嘉琪等.浦东新区小学生多动症调查分析.中国学校卫生,2000,21(3):189-190.
8 杜德业,李伟明,陈镜松.广州城区儿童多动症流行病学分析.广东医学,2003,24(3):299-300.
9 Schneider SC, Tan G. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, in pursuit of diagnostic accuracy. Postgrad MED, 1997, 101(4):231.
10 刘庆芳,曾凡林. 多动性障碍诊断问题的文献分析.中国心理卫生杂志,2006, 20(1):10-14.
11 金星明.注意缺陷多动障碍的多维度诊断.中华儿科杂志,2005,43(11): 823-824.
12 中华医学会精神病学分会儿童精神医学学组. 注意缺陷多动障碍诊疗建议. 中华儿科杂志,2006, 44(10): 758-759.
13 许克铭.提高儿童注意缺陷伴多动性障碍的诊治水平.中华儿科杂志,2004, 42(4):2442-2451.
14 Tinius TP. The integrated visual and auditory continuous performance test as a neuropsychological measure. Arch Clin Neuropsycho,2003,18: 439-454.
15 Sostek AJ, Buchsbaum MS, Rapoport JL. Effects of amphetamine on vigilance performance in normal and hyperactive children. J Abnorm Child Psycholo,1980,8:491-500.
16 Lee HJ, Cho S, Shin MS.Supporting diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactive disorder with novelty detection. Artific Intelligen Med,2008,42: 199-212.
17 Augusto P, Claudio P, Riccardo A, et al.Attention and executive functions profile in drug naive ADHD subtypes.Brain Devel, 2007,29:400-408.
18 Collins LF, Long CJ. Visual reaction time and its relationship to neuropsychological test performance. Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 1996,11(7): 613-623.
19  Western SL, Long CJ. Relationship between reaction time and neuropsychological test performance. Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 1996,11(7):557-571.
20 Riccio CA, Reynolds CR, Lowe P, et al. The continuous performance test: A window on the neural substrates for attention? Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 2002,17(3): 235-272.
21 Corbett BA,Constantine LJ. Autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Assessing attention and response control with the integrated visual and auditory continuous performance test. Child Neuropsychol,2006,12(4-5):335-348.
22 孙学礼主编.精神病学.北京:高等教育出版社,2003,516-519.
23 熊忠贵,石淑华,徐海青.儿童注意缺陷多动障碍视听整合连续性行为测试的应用评价.中国妇幼保健,2006,21: 637-639.
24 王伟红,刘薇,邸向愉.整合视听连续性测试在儿童注意缺陷多动障碍中的应用. 临床军医杂志,2008, 36(1): 36-37.
25 Jonkman LM, Kemner C, Verbaten MN.Effects of methylphenidate on event-related potentials and performance of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder children in auditory and visual selective attention tasks.Biologic Psychiatr,1997,41(6):690-702.
26 Hirayama S, Hamazaki T, Terasawa K. Effect of docosahexaenoic acid-containing food administration on symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-a placebo-controlled double-blind study. Europ J Clin Nutrit,2004,58(3):467-473.
27 马学梅,赵亚茹,赵云静等.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童视觉和听觉持续性注意力的比较.中国儿童保健杂志,2006,14(2):138-139.
28 潘学霞,麻宏伟,戴晓梅. 整合视听连续测试诊断注意缺陷多动障碍的临床应用探讨.中国当代儿科杂志,2007,9(3):210-212.
29 Quinn CA. Detection of malingering in assessment of adult ADHD. Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 2003, 18(4): 379-95.
30 Spencer TJ, Biederman J, Faraone S, et al.Impact of tic disorders on ADHD outcome across the life cycle: Findings from a large group of adults with and without ADHD. Am J Psychiatry,2001,158(4):611-617.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 崔玉峰, 林毅军, 王志民. 幽门螺杆菌分子检测技术研究进展[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 257-262.
[3] 唐金侨, 叶宇佳, 王港, 赵彬, 马艳宁. 医学影像学检查方法在颞下颌关节紊乱病中临床应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 406-411.
[4] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
[5] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[6] 熊鹰, 林敬莱, 白奇, 郭剑明, 王烁. 肾癌自动化病理诊断:AI离临床还有多远?[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 535-540.
[7] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[8] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[9] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[10] 王秋生. 胆道良性疾病诊疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 779-782.
[11] 李浩, 陈棋帅, 费发珠, 张宁伟, 李元东, 王硕晨, 任宾. 慢性肝病肝纤维化无创诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 863-867.
[12] 谭瑞义. 小细胞骨肉瘤诊断及治疗研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 781-784.
[13] 王子阳, 王宏宾, 刘晓旌. 血清标志物对甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 677-681.
[14] 陈慧, 邹祖鹏, 周田田, 张艺丹, 张海萍. 皮肤镜对头皮红斑性皮肤病辅助鉴别诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 692-698.
[15] 胡云鹤, 周玉焯, 付瑞瑛, 于凡, 李爱东. CHS-DRG付费制度下GB1分组住院费用影响因素分析与管理策略探讨[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 568-574.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?